1. 1 Groundwater Pollution 150506 GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation

2. 2 These lectures were adopted from “ENHANCED ATTENUATION: A REFERENCE GUIDE ON APPROACHES TO INCREASE THE NATURAL TREATMENT CAPACITY OF A SYSTEM” August 2006 Washington Savannah River Company. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy www.cluin.org/download/contaminantfocus /tce/DOE_EA_doc.pdf

3. 3 Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) and enhanced attenuation (EA) are two environmental management strategies that rely on various processes to degrade or immobilize contaminants and are used at sites where contaminant plumes have low risk and are not growing.

4. 4 Monitored Natural Attenuation The term ‘monitored natural attenuation’ …refers to the reliance on natural attenuation processes (within the context of a carefully controlled and monitored clean-up approach) to achieve site- specific remedial objectives within a time frame that is reasonable compared to that offered by other more active methods. The ‘natural attenuation processes’ that are at work in such a remediation approach include a variety of physical, chemical, or biological processes that, under favorable conditions, act without human intervention to reduce mass, toxicity, mobility, volume, or concentration of contaminants in soil or groundwater.

5. 5

6. 6 Monitored natural attenuation A strategy for in situ remediation. MNA relies on the naturally occurring physical, chemical, and biological processes. MNA can lessen concentrations of certain contaminants in groundwater, enough to protect human health and the environment.

7. 7 Monitored natural attenuation The changes in contaminant concentrations are monitored through wells that are placed throughout the contaminated groundwater zone. These show the level of contamination over time and its movement in the subsurface.

8. 8 The important initial step in MNA includes some form of primary source treatment to reduce source mass (and mass flux). Both modeling and field investigations indicate that reducing source mass leads to decreases in the mass flux feeding a plume.

9. 9 However, the magnitude of reduction in mass flux attained by source treatment depends on a combination of site specific factors including source contaminant architecture and site specific hydrogeologic conditions.

10. 10 Rao (2001) looked at dense non- aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source reduction and suggested the following:

11. 11 It is proposed that not exceeding a threshold contaminant flux across a control plane, rather than contaminant concentration at a monitoring point or contaminant mass reduction, should be used as the basis for evaluating the effectiveness of source-zone remediation. The threshold contaminant flux should be set equal to the natural attenuation capacity within the dissolved plume.

12. 12 This statement makes the important connection among source treatment, mass flux reduction, and the goal of achieving a balance between flux and natural attenuation capacity. Attaining this objective ensures a stable plume (i.e. one that does not expand over time).

13. 13 The impact of MNA on a cVOC plume can be illustrated in Figure 2-1. As indicated, the resultant flux at the control plane exceeds the regulatory limit showing that the attenuation capacity of the system is insufficient for MNA to be a viable treatment alternative.

14. 14

15. 15 2.1 NATURAL ATTENUATION PROCESSES The natural attenuation capacity of a hydrogeologic system results from the combined impact of several natural processes.

16. 16 Examples include physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms operating within hydrogeologic systems by which contaminants are either diluted, degraded to innocuous byproducts, or their rate of migration is retarded. All of these processes operate without human intervention.

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19 Organic versus inorganic contaminant plume. Natural processes are active within the ground- water aquifer.

20. 20 2.1.1 Physical Attenuation Processes Mass transfer of contaminants to groundwater in the source area creates a dissolved phase plume that transports contaminants by advection.

21. 21 In addition, a vapor phase plume will develop for cVOC contaminants in the vadose zone. Vapor phase contaminants can outgas to the atmosphere and be transferred to groundwater by entrainment in infiltrating precipitation or by diffusion.

22. 22 These are important physical attenuation mechanisms for cVOCs that operate in the vadose zone.

23. 23 As shown in Figure 2-1, as the contaminant plume migrates it will be influenced by various attenuation processes. Each process contributes to the overall attenuation of contaminants.

24. 24 In fact, what happens is a reduction of the amount of contaminant mass passing through a control plane per unit time (mass flux).

25. 25

26. 26 The location of the control plane may be defined by a compliance agreement or may be associated with discharges to the receptor.

27. 27 Dispersion and diffusion are examples of physical attenuation mechanisms that occur in groundwater. Hydrodynamic dispersion leads to physical dilution of contaminants in groundwater resulting in an increase in the size (volume) of the plume.

28. 28 Diffusion results in contaminants migrating into low permeability parts of the aquifer where they are sequestered in the small pores present in clay-rich material and porous bedrock and only released slowly into groundwater by back-diffusion.

29. 29 Eventually a steady state condition will exist for diffusion and dispersion. The combination of processes reduces both the concentration and mass flux of contaminants.

30. 30 2.1.2 Chemical Attenuation Processes Sorption includes both physical (absorption) and chemical (adsorption) attenuation processes by which cVOCs are partitioned into the sorbing medium (e.g., soil organic material) or attach to the surfaces of certain solid phases, respectively.

31. 31 Sorption of cVOCs can occur in both the vadose and saturated zones. Sorption causes a reduction in the rate of migration of contaminants in aquifers resulting in a reduction in mass flux. For convenience, both mechanisms are treated in this section.

32. 32 In equilibrium sorption a steady state will be reached in which the rate of sorption becomes equal to the rate of re-release resulting in no further changes in mass flux.

33. 33 For some contaminants under certain conditions sorption is sometimes referred to as “irreversible”. Irreversible sorption is when a chemical species is more strongly bound to the sorbing medium during desorption than during initial sorption.

34. 34 The term sometimes appears to be used to describe a situation where once sorbed, the contaminant is essentially permanently removed from the plume and remains associated with the sorbing aquifer (or vadose zone) material.

35. 35 The net result of sorption is to reduce the mass flux of contaminants crossing the control plane.

36. 36 2.1.3 Biological and Abiotic Degradation Attenuation Processes Both biological and abiotic processes degrade contaminants into a variety of products.

37. 37 Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria may metabolize the contaminants or may reduce sulfate into sulfide, which, in turn, can combine with Fe(II) to form sulfide minerals having the capability of reductively dechlorinating cVOCs to non-toxic products.

38. 38 Plant-based processes can result in in situ destruction of cVOCs in the root zone, uptake, storage, metabolism, or translocation to the atmosphere. In every case, contaminants are removed from the plume leading to a reduction of mass flux.

39. 39

40. 40 This and the previous slide show an example of a network design for performance monitoring, including target zones for monitoring effectiveness with respect to specific remedial objectives.

41. 41 An EPA site for Monitored Natural Attenuation is at http://www.epa.gov/ada/gw/mna.ht ml http://www.epa.gov/ada/gw/mna.ht ml

42. 42