1. Technical Session 2: An Overview of Risk Communication Bryna Brennan Senior Advisor, Risk and Outbreak Communication Pan American Health Organization/WHO Trinidad and Tobago 24-25 October 2011

2. Contents Risk Communication Definitions Risk Perception WHO Outbreak Guidelines

3. Public Health Emergencies

4. High economic and social impact Alarm in the population uncertainty, fear, anger, anxiety = demand for timely, clear, useful information Differing views and perceptions among officials and the public

5. Who’s going to help us? What do we do? Do we need vaccines? Are they going to evacuate the village? Will the schools be closed? Do we need masks? How do we get them? Is the military going to help out? Are we going to die? Mixed messages from officials = alarm, lack of trust

6. Growing media interest = sensationalism International media Rapid transmission via internet and social networks Information gaps – filled by unofficial news sources Direct involvement of political actors

7. Role of Risk Communication During Public Health Emergencies Help at risk populations make informed decisions Encourage protective behaviors Complement existing surveillance systems Coordinate health and non-health partners Minimize social and economic disruption Build the trust required to prepare for, respond to and recover from serious public health threats

8. Risk Communication Risk communication is an integral component of public health risk management. It is focused on dialogue with those affected and concerned and strives to ensure communication strategies are evidence based. Under the IHR, risk communication for public health emergencies includes the range of communication capacities required through the preparedness, response and recovery phases of a serious public health event to encourage informed decision making, positive behaviour change and the maintenance of trust. PAHO/WHO 2010

9. The Real Definition

10. Risk Communication Not the number of injured, ill or dead Not statistical information Not a press release, poster or campaign Not public relations

11. Activate crisis plan, etc. Opportunity for Control CRISIS Preparation Start Control Recovery Evaluation Evaluate work Document lessons learned Identify actions for improvement Components Put together risk comm team Internal coordination Strategic alliances Risk communication plan Staff training Prepare messages Media Plan Communication surveillance Staffing plan PAHO Model 2010

12. Risk Communication Strategy

13. Risk Perception

15. How do you see it? Culture, background, norms, desires, beliefs Where you see it….

16. The risks that kill people and the risks that scare them are two different things. People respond to perceived risk. Real Risk Is it the same? Perceived Risk

17. 1 Percepção de risco 17

18. 1 Percepção de risco 18

19. 1 Percepção de risco 19

20. Exercise Examples of real and perceived risk

21. Risk: How experts perceive risk The multiplication of Magnitude x Probability: How bad if it happens? (Magnitude) How likely to happen? (Probability)

22. A new “definition” of risk: Risk = Hazard + Outrage (Peter Sandman’s formula) Copyright 2006 Peter Sandman

23. High hazard/low outrage Hazard Perception Indifferent Public Clear messages Clear messages Health education Health education Security training Security training Environmental activism Environmental activism Mass Media Specialists

24. Public relations/ health education Audience: apathetic, aren’t interested, getting their attention is quite difficult Need to increase outrage and concern Task: messages that reinforce appeals to move the audience towards your goals, provoke more outrage – action Medium:mass media to provoke action Barriers:audience inattention, size, media resistance 1.High Hazard, Low Outrage

25. Stakeholder Relations Hazard Perception Interested public Specialized media Specialized media Newsletters Newsletters Respond to questions, doubts Respond to questions, doubts Explain technical details Explain technical details Interpersonal dialogue webchat Specialists

26. Stakeholder relations Audience: stakeholders – interested and attentive audience, neither too apathetic or too upset to listen Task: to discuss, explain, respond to the audience/ stakeholder Medium: dialogue, supplemented by specializes media Barriers: inefficiency of one on one dialogue 2. Moderate Hazard, Moderate Outrage

27. Low Hazard and High Perception of Risk and Outrage Hazard Perception Reduce the perception Reduce the perception Acknowledge errors Acknowledge errors Share control Share control Ask forgiveness Ask forgiveness Listen Listen Talk to the people Outraged public Specialists

28. High Outrage/Low Hazard outrage management Audience:‘outraged – anger, largely at you, ‘fanatics’, (justified or not) you have their attention Task: reduce audience outrage – listen, recognize errors, apologize, share control and credit Medium: in person dialogue, audience does most of the talking Barriers: outrage

29. Crisis Communication Hazard Perception Specialists Mass Media Recognize uncertainty Recognize uncertainty Avoid excessive confidence Avoid excessive confidence Share the dilemma Share the dilemma Show your humanity and empathy Show your humanity and empathy Offer things to do Offer things to do Alarmed public

30. 4.High Hazard, High Outrage crisis communication – in a crisis there is no ‘PUBLIC,’ everyone is a stakeholder Audience:very upset, outraged – more fear and misery than anger Task: to help the audience bear its fear, concern and suffering. Recognize uncertainty. Avoid excess confidence. Demonstrate your humanity, show empathy. Seek public participation. Medium: monologue via the mass media, dialogue – one on one where possible Barriers: stress of the crisis, missing the difference between crisis communication and routine

31. Exercise Examples of high risk, low perception Examples of low risk, high perception

32. WHO Outbreak Communication Guidelines

33. For Public Health Authorities: WHO Risk Communication Principles Trust Transparency Early announcement Listening, communication surveillance Planning = Risk Comm. Strategy

34. Trust Trust is earned before a crisis Need to take actions that maintain trust Enables population to take appropriate actions. Recognize uncertainty, avoid false hopes Include the public in decisions, actions Ask more of people

35. Transparency Explain the decision-making process Aim for total candor Key to maintaining confidence; linked to the quality, veracity and clarity of the information. Limits to transparency, balance rights and information

36. Arguments For Transparency Rumors fill the information void Promotes protective behavior Keeps you out front as the information provider You can’t hide outbreaks

37. Early Announcement The opportunity to make the “first announcement” leads to trust, reduces rumors and can save lives. Acknowledge that the situation will change when there is more information. Shows leadership The lack of information is NOT a reason to put off the first announcement of a real or suspected outbreak. Inform of what you know, what you are doing, and what you want the public to do.

38. Listen to the Public “If you do something for me and you do it without me, then you do it against me”. Mr J. Nehru, India PM

39. Communication Surveillance Is the public worried and in need or reassurance? Is the public too calm and in need of warning? Are they angry and in need of calming? Crisis + heightened public emotions + limited access to facts + rumor, gossip, speculation, assumption, and inference = an unstable information environment, panic, bad decisions, danger, credibility

40. Planning Risk communication part of the preparation for all public health emergencies. Eliminates the crisis decisions A National Risk Communication Strategy includes a crisis plan

41. Risk communication Is not a news release, poster or public relations Understanding and analyzing real and perceived risk is fundamental for the development of a risk communication strategy. If the public doesn’t perceive a risk, they won’t respond adequately to prevent it. The perception also can impede the response. Risk communication must include the public, the community, in their own languages and cultural norms. Conclusions