Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%"— Presentation transcript:

1 iLEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds

2 Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%  Attendance- 55th District Reading Data: (2010-2011)  K: PSF-20%; NWF- 58%  1: DORF- 47.5%  2: DORF- 46%  3: DORF- 36.6%  4: R-CBM- 30.8%  5: R-CBM- 34.6%  6: R-CBM- 28%  7: R-CBM- 22%  8: R-CBM- 19%

3 RtI Implementation - Goals 1. Increase teacher effectiveness to ensure all students succeed 2. Improve academic achievement of high needs students 3. Improve academic achievement of all students with disabilities and limited English proficiency

4 RtI Implementation- Roll Out  3 phrases  36 schools  Full implementation at the start of year 4

5 What Now?- Key Components  Alignment of all support structures  Implementation of RtI  Professional Learning Communities  Data Days

6 Before & After  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 1.54%  Attendance- 55th  Academic Ranking- 12 th  Graduation Rate- 89.3% (14th)  SAT- 8 th  Dropout Rate- 1.99% (13th)  Attendance- 14th

7 Before & After District Reading Data: (2013-2014)  K: PSF- 81%; NWF- 80%  1: DORF- 69%  2: DORF- 66%  3: DORF- 64%  4: R-CBM- 61.1%  5: R-CBM- 72.4%  6: R-CBM- 54%  7: R-CBM- 56%  8: R-CBM- 52.5%  9: R-CBM- 65.8% District Reading Data: (2010-2011)  K: PSF-20%; NWF- 58%  1: DORF- 47.5%  2: DORF- 46%  3: DORF- 36.6%  4: R-CBM- 30.8%  5: R-CBM- 34.6%  6: R-CBM- 28%  7: R-CBM- 22%  8: R-CBM- 19%

8 Purpose of Data Days  Ensure that ALL students achieve growth  Equip teachers with what they need through: Data Analysis Determining root cause How to respond by making instructional adjustments  Provide skills and resources that teachers need to: Meet instructional needs Close gaps Ensure appropriate growth for ALL students

9 Data Day Goals  BOY Follow grade-level appropriate Literacy & Math Diagnostic Flowchart Analyze BOY Universal Screening & Assessment data Analyze Literacy Diagnostic data (Core Phonics Survey, etc.) Complete p.3 of ‘Revise and Evaluate the Plan’ on Tier 1 RIOT that was completed by PLC’s in September Complete p.3 – ‘Revise and Evaluate the Plan’ for any who was in process from the pervious year(s) and is making little to no progress in Tier 2-1 or is receiving Tier 3-2-1  MOY Follow grade-level appropriate Literacy & Math Diagnostic Flowchart Analyze MOY Universal Screening & Assessment data Literacy & Math data analyzed for any newly identified ‘at-risk students’ Literacy & Math Progress monitoring data analyzed for all students receiving Tiers 2-1 and Tiers 3-2-1 supports Complete required Adequate Growth Charts for appropriate grade level assessments Complete p.3 – ‘Revise and Evaluate the Plan’ on Tier 1 Complete p. 3- ‘Revise and Evaluate the Plan’ for any student who was in process from the previous year(s) and is making little to no progress in Tier 2- 1 or is receiving Tier 3-2-1 supports

10 What data do we analyze?  Universal screening data (Reading 3D, AIMSweb)  Core Phonics Survey data  Diagnostic Screening data  Progress Monitoring data

11 Foundational Skills Flowchart Sight-Word Knowledge Decoding Phonemic Awareness Vocabulary Comprehension Fluency 80%

12 Experience Data Day!

13 Summary of Impact Report

14

15 Students who made at least 15 words of growth from BOY to MOY

16 Students who did not make 15 words of growth from BOY to MOY

17 Summary of Impact Report

18 Students who made at least 16 words of growth from BOY to MOY

19 Students who did not make 16 words of growth from BOY to MOY

20 Summary of Impact Report

21 Students who made at least 16 words of growth from BOY to MOY

22 Students who did not make 16 words of growth from BOY to MOY

23 At your tables, discuss the following:  What do you notice about the growth of the students in the first 4 th grade class?  What do you notice about the growth of the students in the second 4 th grade class?  Which teacher would you say is the stronger teacher? Why?  Based on all the data that you have, would you still choose the same teacher for your child? Why or why not?  Why is it important to dig deeper into the data?

24 Feedback  Please leave us your feedback from today’s session!  http://padlet.com/ileadragoulds/bestpractices http://padlet.com/ileadragoulds/bestpractices

25 Contact Us!  Visit: innovativeLEADR.com  Email: brie@i-LEADR.com amanda@i-LEADR.com


Download ppt "ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google