Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Eric Holmboe, MD Employment: ACGME Discussion of off-label drug use: not applicable 56 th ASH Annual Meeting Disclosure Statement.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Eric Holmboe, MD Employment: ACGME Discussion of off-label drug use: not applicable 56 th ASH Annual Meeting Disclosure Statement."— Presentation transcript:

1 Eric Holmboe, MD Employment: ACGME Discussion of off-label drug use: not applicable 56 th ASH Annual Meeting Disclosure Statement

2 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education © 2014 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education What Constitutes “Good” Assessment and Milestones-based Assessment

3 The Assessment “System” Assessments within Program: Direct observations Audit and performance data Multi-source FB Simulation ITExam Qual/Quant “Data” Synthesis: Committee Residents Faculty, PDs and others Milestones and EPAs as Guiding Framework and Blueprint Accreditation Unit of Analysis: Program Certification and Credentialing Unit of Analysis: Individual JUDGEMENTJUDGEMENT D FB DD PUBLICPUBLIC

4 Process vs.Outcome Approach Educational Program VariableStructure/ProcessCompetency-based Driving force: processTeacherLearner Path of learningHierarchical (Teacher→student) Non-hierarchical (Teacher↔student) Responsibility: contentTeacherStudent and Teacher Goal of educ. encounter Knowledge acquisitionKnowledge application Typical assessment toolSingle subject measureMultiple objective measures Assessment toolProxyAuthentic (mimics real tasks of profession) Setting for evaluationRemoved (gestalt)Direct observation EvaluationNorm-referencedCriterion-referenced Timing of assessmentEmphasis on summativeEmphasis on formative Program completionFixed timeVariable time Carracchio, et al. 2002.

5 Measurement Tools: Criteria Cees van der Vleuten’s utility index: Utility = V x R x A x EI x CE/Context* Where: V = validity R = reliability A = acceptability E = educational impact C = cost effectiveness *Context = ∑ Clinical Microsystems

6 Criteria for “Good” Assessment 1 Validity or Coherence Reproducibility or Consistency Equivalence Feasibility Educational effect Learning that occurs in preparation for an assessment (e.g. certification exam; MRCP) Catalytic effect Assessment resulting in feedback that “drives future learning forward.” Acceptability 1 Ottawa Conference Working Group 2010

7 Assessing for the Desired Outcome Knows (knowledge) Knows How (competence) Shows How (performance) Does (action) Diagnostic Reasoning using clinical vignettes or CSR Performance in Practice//Multi-source feedback/ Direct Observation Standardized Patients/Simulation Multiple choice Questions Work-based assessment is mostly accomplished through the observations and questions of faculty, team members, peers and other co-workers

8 © 2014 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones and Work-based Assessment  The predominant approach in CBME is work- based assessment  Milestones can serve as a framework for shared mental models and to inform observation and assessment by faculty


Download ppt "Eric Holmboe, MD Employment: ACGME Discussion of off-label drug use: not applicable 56 th ASH Annual Meeting Disclosure Statement."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google