Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHoward James Modified over 8 years ago
1
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Example of hydrological modelling Slobodan Nickovic World Weather Research Programme World Meteorological Organization, Geneva with contributions in [B]: G. Pejanovic, M. Vujadinovic, V. Djurdjevic, B. Rajkovic (Belgrade University)
2
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 HYDRO1k USGS topography HYDROSHED-500m FAO soil texture data USGS land use data DATASETS: HYdrology PROgnostic Model integrated system Example of hydrological modelling Nickovic, et al (2010), HYPROM hydrology surface runoff prognostic model, Water Resour. Res.
3
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 HYPROM - Full dynamic (FD) equation concept Kinematic approximation neglects inertia forces !!
4
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Full dynamics (FD) vs. kinematics (KN) FD model more accurate FD: friction slope term requires special treatment (Froude number >2) KN: simplifications avoid problem (Froude number <2) Most watershed models adapt KN approach KN cannot accurately represent large-scale, more inert processes
5
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Kinematic approx Not appropriate for basins with slow slow flows Acceptable for flesh floods (where friction and gradient forces are in approx. balance) Full dynamic system to be used
6
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Friction slope Potential source of model instability when FD requires completely different numerical approach to resolve the Instability due to vanishing water heights!
7
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Friction slope numerics Water depth is in the dominator of friction slope terms Generates numerical instability when depth vanishes Usual approach - water depths to be above a threshold (not a physically-based approach)
8
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Friction slope numerics – new approach Implicit time scheme applied unconditionally stable method convergent for when then physically based method
9
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Nickovic, et al (2010) Friction slope numerics – new approach
10
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Horizontal semi-staggered E grid used the same as the NMM grid problem with gravity wave short wave noise new method to resolve the problem – modification of the continuity equation
11
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Synthetic sink experiment with HYPROM Without modificationWith modification
12
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Advection numerics (Janjic, 1997) conserves mass no new extremes no negative values
13
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 River routing River path: A-B-C-D-E-F Mass conserving River –collector from surrounding points Same numerics as for non-river points
14
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 Torrential rain Landslides 7 deaths, quite a damage Complex topography Kobold and Suselj, 2005 Savinja basin
15
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 NMM T and V at 850 hPa, 1 Nov 2000 NMM acc. rainfall, 26 Oct – 6 Nov 2000 Savinja basin
16
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Savinja case – Oct/Nov 2000 River discharge over period 26/10 – 6/11 1990
17
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 Moraca river experiment (Nov 2002 – May 2003) Snow melting case Seasonal-scale run Problem with soil types
18
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 parameter Clay Loam (09) Bedrock (15) sat. diffusivity0.113 x 10 -4 0.136 x 10 -3 sat. conductivity2.45 x 10 -6 1.41 x 10 -4 porosity0.4650.20 CH constant8.172.79 Sensitivity to soil type
19
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 model vs. observations discharge 2008 case 2008 water budget components 2008 accumulations
20
WWRP- GAW INCA-CE 5 th Joint Progress Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, 6-8 2012 climate studies Bojana river: Buna Bridge discharge
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.