Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEleanore Hicks Modified over 8 years ago
1
League of Women Voters Money In Politics Review Ed Smith January 16, 2016
2
Libertarian vs. Egalitarian ◦ Yasmin Dawood’s “Campaign Finance and American Democracy”, June 2015 Fundamentalist vs. Idealist ◦ Cass R. Sunstein’s “Radicals in Robes”, 2005 Conservative vs. Progressive ◦ Robin West’s “Progressive and Conservative Constitutionalism”, 1990
3
Libertarian ◦ Gov should not restrict electoral speech Freedom from state control Free market of ideas Speech should be rebutted, not censored Freedom of speech is essential for democracy ◦ 1 st Amendment guarantee of personal rights Presumption against state regulation Campaign contributions Campaign expenditures
4
Egalitarian ◦ State regulation of speech sometimes is required Prevent monopolizing political discourse by wealthy Prevent limiting communication means ◦ Voice of less powerful not heard Marketplace of ideas not fully represented ◦ Constrain voices of wealthy Equalize the power of all citizens
5
Methodology by Supreme Court Categories of justices: 1.Fundamentalists – original constitution (i.e., Renquist/Roberts) 2.Perfectionists (Idealists) – broad interpretation (i.e., Warren court majority) 3.Minimalists – narrow decisions address specifics (i.e., moderates) 4.Majoritarians – judges uphold legislative policies (i.e., New Deal upholders)
6
Conservatives’ view ◦ State action best guided by private/social normative authority ◦ Constitution is best means to preserve authority ◦ Guard against legislative or judicial encroachment ◦ Social or private institutions Likely to view as a source of wisdom and legitimate authority.
7
Progressives’ view ◦ Power and authority of some social groups as “fruits of illegitimate private hierarchy” ◦ Constitution is one important mechanism for challenging private orders ◦ Social or private institutions Likely to see patterns of domination, subordination, and oppression attended by inequalities of power.
8
The dualities: ◦ Liberty vs. Equality ◦ Strict vs. broad Constitutional interpretation ◦ Faith in, or fear of, private and group normative authority
9
Can Government regulate money in politics? ◦ Perhaps, Somewhat, Sometimes FECA (1971, 1974), BCRA (2002) ◦ Attitudes and courts change over time Buckley (1975), FEC (1986), Austin (1990), WRL (2007), Citizens United (2010), McCutcheon (2014)
10
Various definitions ◦ Quid pro quo, monitory influence, distortion, bribery, inequality, etc. Corruption = public power used for private gains One problem: hard to discern between corruption and ordinary democratic politics ◦ Use or public office for private gain (bribery) ◦ Use of public office for political gain (quid pro quo) When does legislative responsiveness to constituent wishes transform to corruption?
11
Concept of inequalities in speech capacities “The concept that government may restrict the speech of some elements in our society in order to enhance the relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment” – Supreme Court, Buckley Equality arguments not popular with the Court
12
Elections treated as distinct domain of democratic activity Campaign speech vs. political speech Wall between elections & campaigns ◦ Art I, sec 4 does not apply to political debate before elections
13
Academic literature on campaign finance regulation is vast (many fields) ◦ Not much consensus on the issues ◦ Concern on role of money in electoral process Many efforts to regulate have been overturned by the courts Little empirical evidence that money buys influence ◦ But some correlation to legislative outputs Campaign finance study is a moving target ◦ Courts have allowed more money in politics
14
Liberty Equality
15
LWVNOC ◦ http://lwvnoc.org/index.html http://lwvnoc.org/index.html LWVNOC Money In Politics Study ◦ http://lwvnoc.org/Money_In_Politics_US.html http://lwvnoc.org/Money_In_Politics_US.html LWVUS Money In Politics Review ◦ http://forum.lwv.org/ http://forum.lwv.org/ ◦ Click on “OUR WORK”, choose Money In Politics Review
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.