1. International Dialogue Forum on “Low Carbon Development and Poverty Reduction” Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, February 21- 22, 2013

2. Results from a research project on “Climate protection, development and equity: Decarbonisation in developing countries and countries in transition” Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Stephan Klasen (University of Göttingen) Michael Jakob (PIK) Jann Lay (GIGA and University of Göttingen)

3. Poverty reduction and climate change As income increases

4. A more direct link: Energy and human development Steckel et al. (forthcoming) Threshold at around 40 GJ per capita 10 GJ per capita can be explained by subsistence needs

5. Historical contributors to global emissions Source: Steckel et al. (2011) Since 2000, China has been the main factor behind the increase of global emission…

6. But emission levels still differ In rich countries: Emissions have leveled off and are falling – US move to gas, economic crises, high energy prices – Europe: Growth of renewables, EUETS, economic crisis Per capita emissions (energy-related CO2) – in China approx. 30% – in India approx. 80% … below German levels

7. Drivers of CO 2 emissions in developing countries ChinaNewly Industrializing Countries … increase has mainly been driven by economic growth!

8. Driving forces of changes in emissions GDP per capita CO 2 emissions per capita Energy intensity Carbon Intensity Before 2000, growth partially off-set by lower energy intensity After 2000: slow- down or even reversal, and increasing carbon intensity

9. Driving forces of changes in emissions

10. Understanding changes in carbon intensity World OECD China Other NICs China’s increasing carbon intensity almost exclusively due to rising share of coal in the energy system (“renaissance of coal”)

11. Energy use patterns Source: Jakob et al. (2012) Pronounced differences between OECD and non-OECD countries w.r.t. energy use patterns on the level of primary energy carriers and economic sectors…

12. Economic and energy use convergence … and economic convergence is closely related to conver-gence of energy use patterns.

13. Inequality, growth, and emission dynamics Energy use and consumption patterns (lifestyles) differ considerably within countries between income groups Last 20 years have seen high growth and rising inequality in many developing countries (including India), alongside rising emissions Are the rich responsible for rising carbon emissions? Micro level analysis using carbon footprint analyses for India, Indonesia, Philippines – Linking household expenditure patterns with input-output tables and emission intensity of production

14. Micro-level analysis: India’s Carbon Footprint 2004 Income largest driver of carbon footprint Rising middle class will strongly increase emissions (move to carbon-intensive lifestyles) Higher emission due to urbanization and education (over and above income effect) Source: Grunewald et al. 2012

15. Carbon Footprint in Philippines Source: Serino (2012)

16. Carbon footprint in Indonesia Source: Irfany (2013) 2005 2009

17. Remarkably similar patterns in 3 countries Income growth by far the biggest driver of carbon footprint at the household level (elasticity close to 1) Urbanization and education are additional drivers of carbon footprint (but effect weakening over time); Reducing inequality will speed up poverty reduction but will (moderately) increase emissions Does this also hold in a cross-section of countries? – Macro level analysis using cross-country data Non-linear effects of income, inequality, and the interaction of the two;

18. Macro-level analysis Non-linear effect of income growth (Environmental Kuznets Curve, but turning point very high) The higher inequality, the lower aggregate emissions In poor and middle- income countries, this trade-off particularly severe In rich countries less so (and win-win possible) Source: Grunewald et al 2012

19. How to grow without increasing emissions? Breaking the convergence between economic development and energy use patterns: Renewables as one pathway Trade-offs – Often more expensive than fossil fuels – Higher energy prices With adverse distributional implications With negative externalities for economic development (industrialization!) – Technological challenges (e.g. grid integration) Synergies/win-win situations – “Green” energy systems with positive ancillary (environmental ) benefits – Pro-poorness of decentralized energy systems – Green jobs? 19

20. Renewable Energy in Developing Countries (DCs) Hydropower – Wide-spread adoption: generated by 83% of all DCs – Average share of total electricity: 38 percent (11 percent weighted with total country electricity consumption) – Top 3 DC producers (billion kWh in 2009): China (549), Brazil (387), Russia (162), also have top technically exploitable capability Non-hydropower (biomass, geothermal, solar, and wind) – Generated by about 45% of DCs – Average share of total electricity: 1.4 percent – Most important: biomass, geothermal – Very uncommon: solar and wind – But: High growth rates from low basis Source: Pohl et al. (2012)

21. Macro analysis of RET adoption Study of diffusion of non-hydro renewable energy technologies for electricity generation (NHRE) across 108 developing countries (between 1980 and 2010) Main findings: NHRE diffusion accelerates with – Implementation of economic and regulatory instruments – Higher per capita income and schooling levels – Stable, democratic regimes NHRE diffusion is slower with – Greater openness and aid – Institutional and strategic policy support programs – Growth of electricity consumption – High fossil fuel production 21 Source: Pohl and Mulder (2013)

22. Micro analysis: Solar home systems in Kenya Kenya's SHS market one of the biggest worldwide Data on households from the Kenyan Integrated Household Budget Survey (KIHBS) 2005/06, 13 430 households With information on SHS use and potential drivers – Income, education, residence (rural, urban), housing situation – Kerosene price – Potential grid access, prevalence of SHS Lighting fuel choice model 22 Source: Lay et al. (2012)

23. 23 Main findings Evidence for a cross- sectional energy ladder with very high income threshold for modern fuel use – including solar energy use – to move beyond traditional and transitional fuel Income, education and SHS clustering are key determinants of SHS adoption

24. Conclusions In the past: Close relationship between economic growth and emissions growth No sign of decoupling in fast-growing developing countries – “Renaissance” of coal – Convergence of energy use patterns Inequality of per capita emissions within countries is important: Middle-class effect Very low adoption rates of non-hydro RET, consistent with very late ‘takeoff’ of SHS at the micro level ‘Decarbonization’ of economic development – in particular the transition – is no trivial task

25. Policy implications Short to medium-term: Reducing emission intensity of production patterns (energy source, use, and systems) Longer-term: Lifestyle and urbanization patterns (but here bigger task is first in industrialized countries) General policy guidelines: (1) Avoid lock-ins, (2) Consider possible synergies and trade-offs If the policy objective are GHG emissions reductions: Think global, seek cooperative solutions – Compensation mechanisms, NAMAs – Linking of emissions trading schemes Tax/subsidy policies as feasible and effective domestic instrument: Green and progressive tax reforms possible