Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHomer Joseph Modified over 8 years ago
1
Brian Nosek University of Virginia -- Center for Open Science http://briannosek.com/http://briannosek.com/ -- http://cos.io/http://cos.io/ Improving Openness of Scholarly Communication
2
Mission: Improve openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research
3
Open Access Open Data Open Workflows Outcomes Content Process
4
Openness for Institutions Mission
5
Openness for Institutions Mission Discovery of own faculty activities Under-used repositories Evolving role for university library and librarians Subscription costs to buy back access to knowledge Evolving role for university presses
6
Access is restricted/hidden by Licenses Terms of service Lack of programmatic access Pay walls Unavailability Inconsistency Low quality SHARE is assembling and enhancing a free, open dataset of scholarly research activity
7
ProvidersConsumers Notify Gather
8
Example interface http://osf.io/share
9
SHARE Notify Providers by Type
10
SHARE Providers by % of ~6.5 Million Records DataCite CrossRef Figshare PMC DataONE ArXiv IRs
11
SHARE Community Meeting Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA Hackathon, July 11-12 Community Meeting, July 12-13 Themes – Pairing automatic enhancement with expert curation and the creation of tools to support these efforts – Pedagogy to develop expert curation of local data and technical skills to get SHARE data into local services (and then give back to SHARE) – Accessing (meta)data across the research workflow https://arl.formstack.com/forms/share_community_meeting
12
Research Culture on Openness
13
Norms Communality Open sharing Universalism Evaluate research on own merit Disinterestedness Motivated by knowledge and discovery Organized skepticism Consider all new evidence, even against one’s prior work Quality Counternorms Secrecy Closed Particularlism Evaluate research by reputation Self-interestedness Treat science as a competition Organized dogmatism Invest career promoting one’s own theories, findings Quantity
14
Anderson, Martinson, & DeVries, 2007
15
Technology to enable change Training to enact change Incentives to embrace change
16
Signals: Making Behaviors Visible Promotes Adoption
17
% Articles reporting that data was available 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
18
% of Articles reporting that data was available 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Reportedly available Available Correct Data Usable Data Complete Data
19
Documentation Curation Preservation Accessibility
20
Search and discover Develop idea Design study Acquire materials Collect data Store data Analyze data Interpret findings Write report Publish report OSF Open Science Framework A scholarly commons connecting the entire research lifecycle https://osf.io/
21
Collaboration Documentation Archiving
23
Version Control
25
Merges Public- Private Workflows
27
File downloads Incentives for Openness
28
File downloads Forks
29
Persistent Citable Identifiers
31
Registration
33
Connects Services Researchers Use
36
OpenSesame
37
Awaiting Instruction…
39
OSF 4 Institutions http://osf.usc.edu http://osf.usc.edu
40
OSF Application Framework Workflow Authentication File Storage File Rendering Meta-database Integrations Search SHARE Data osf.io journals registries preprint servers grants management curation, annotation peer review services
41
What can you do? Try out OSF and schedule OSF training OSF for Institutions SHARE Harvesters OSF Integrations OSF for Meetings COS Ambassadors SHARE Hackathon, July 11-12 SHARE Community meeting, July 12-13 Email: Support@cos.io or nosek@virginia.eduSupport@cos.ionosek@virginia.edu
42
http://cos.io/ http://osf.io/ Brian Nosek nosek@virginia.edu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.