Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWendy Melton Modified over 8 years ago
1
Characterization Studies on Metallic Bipolar Plates and Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA) for (PEM) Fuel Cells by Hazem Tawfik, Ph.D., P.E. C.Mfg.E Director of the Institute for Research & Technology Transfer SUNY Distinguished Service Professor NHA Annual Conference 2007 Tuesday, 20 March 2007
2
MOTIVATION High Oil Cost Threatens our National Economy Hydrogen Fuel Cells Promised Clean and Efficient Alternative Energy
3
Agenda –Hydrogen Economy –Hydrogen Fuel Cells –PEM Fuel Cells –Metal Vs Graphite Bipolar Plates –Metal Bipolar Plates –Performance of Metal Bipolar Plates –PEM Fuel Cell Applications –Possible Collaboration Between IRTT and ME
4
U.S. Energy Dependence is Driven By Transportation US Oil Use for Transportation Passenger Vehicles Transportation accounts for 2/3 of the 20 million barrels of oil our nation uses each day. The U.S. imports 55% of its oil, expected to grow to 68% by 2025 under the status quo. Nearly all of our cars and trucks currently run on either gasoline or diesel fuel.
5
water H 2 primary energy sources energy consuming sectors transportation residential commercial industry electricity generation energy carrier water Hydrogen Economy or Hydrogen Energy System Hydrogen Economy or Hydrogen Energy System
10
The Bipolar Plate Functions
13
The Membrane is a high proton conductive – typically made of perfluorocarbon-sulfonic acid ionomer (Nafion)
14
Water Transfer Mechanisms Across the MEA
15
Challenge Bipolar plates represent the backbone of the PEM fuel Cell and are currently made of graphite or graphite composites that have excellent corrosion resistance but suffer brittleness, permeability to gases, poor manufacturability and lower electric conductivity relative to most metals. Metallic bipolar plates hold excellent potential for durability and cost effectiveness, but very corrosive in the fuel cell acidic and humid environment that could tarnish the catalyst and poison the electrolyte.
16
Why Metallic Bipolar Plates Better mechanical properties than Graphite composites – No brittleness Higher electrical and thermal conductivities than graphite Amenable to low cost/high volume manufacturing techniques Better manufacturability than graphite Gas impermeable
17
Brief History of Bipolar Plates’ material More than thirty years ago, GE used Gold coatings on metal plates –performed better than graphite – delamination problems – very high cost Graphite and graphite composites – brittle, permeable to gases – poor manufacturability Oakridge National lab – Nitridation of Stainless steel – low production – very thin layer – expensive Carbide based alloy coatings on Aluminum and Stainless steel – IRTT /Farmingdale State
18
Typical Polarization Curve
21
Contact Resistance Experimental Setup
23
Circuit for Measuring Contact Resistance
27
Corrosion Measurements Setup
28
Completed Intensive Corrosion Evaluation Program on Various metals and conductive ceramic alloys
29
0.5 M H2SO4+200 ppm HF (@ room temperature
30
CNC Machining Center
31
Equipments for flatness measurements
32
Research procedure to reduce deformation MASK AIR COOLING TUBE
33
Single Cell Aluminum Bipolar Plates
34
Single Cell Graphite Bipolar Plates
35
Hydrogen Safety System For Fuel Cell Testing
36
Variable Loading Testing M/C
37
Lifetime Testing of Metallic Bipolar plates vs. Graphite Metallic bipolar plates real-time testing is being performed under cyclic loading at 70 O C for 1000 hours without power degradation
38
Polarization and Power Curves for Carbide based coating at Various Operation Hours – Max percentage difference -0.33
39
Polarization and Power Curves for graphite Composite Bipolar Plates at Various Operation Hours – Max percentage difference -0.49
40
Power Density Curve For Comparison Between Aluminum Coated and Graphite Bipolar Plates
41
Power Density & Efficiency Curve For Comparison Between Aluminum Coated and Graphite Bipolar Plates
42
Economics of Metal Vs. Graphite Relative savings in hydrogen Consumption and efficiency improvement by at least 12% due to higher electric and thermal conductivity of Aluminum vs. graphite bipolar plates at 20 o C.
43
Polarization and Power Curves - After 30 hours of operation at 70 o C For Comparison Between Aluminum Coated and Graphite Bipolar Plates
44
Efficiency and Power Curves - After 30 hours of operation at 70 o C
45
Hydrogen consumption and Power Curves - After 30 hours of operation at 70o C – Hydrogen Consumption Savings of 24%
48
IRTT Carbide based Alloy Performed better than graphite in DMFC Comparison of Performance in Graphite and Metallic Plates Using 5% Methanol
49
Characterization Study Characterization Studies were Performed on Bipolar plates and the Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA) samples Scan Electron Microscope (SEM), measurements were collected from the lands and valleys of the surfaces of the reactant flow conduits at the anode and the cathode. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on samples scraped from the anode and cathode electrodes of the MEA used in the metallic bipolar plates Water as a byproduct produced during the single fuel cells operation were also collected and tested for the existence of chromium, nickel, carbon, iron, sulfur and aluminum using mass spectroscopy.
50
Thermal Spray Coated Bipolar Plate - High Velocity Oxygen Fuel HVOF
51
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Electron Dispersive X-ray (EDAX) Analysis
54
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on samples powder scraped from the anode and cathode electrodes of a MEA operated for 1000 hrs in metallic bipolar plates fuel cell
55
Catalyst Clustered
56
MASS SECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS Samples are passed into argon plasma and their emission intensity is measured for each element of interest and compared to the calibration curve to yield a concentration of each element in the sample solution. Al, Cr, Pt, Fe and Ni, are all < 1ppm each. Carbon less than 0.12%
57
CONCLUSIONS Catalyst (Pt) Clustering effect was observed in the XRD SEM/EDX showed no variation in the surface composition after 1000 hrs of operation Water Analysis also exhibited the Stability of the corrosion resistant coating with no loss of Pt, Al, Fe, Cr and Ni, are all at < 1ppm each. Sulfur and carbon need to be checked in the water byproduct of fuel cells
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.