1. NON-LAND USE PLANNING IN SUB- SAHARAN AFRICA: KENYA-SOLUTIONS φ INCENTIVES TO GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY PREAMBLE: Widespread unplanned developments embody huge obstacles to economic and social growth processes

2. HYPOTHESIS:  Application of environment solutions for clients is compromised by under- developed policy and regulation  Underdeveloped policy and regulation together with non-existing political will are manifest in modern third world development challenges

3. CHALLENGES TO EFFECTIVE PRACTISE  70% of our urban population live in unplanned settlements  By 2015 42% of all Kenyan population will live in urban areas- 1KM drive within Nairobi’s CBD takes 1 hr btw 7.30-9 1600-1800  Unplanned developments compromise service delivery especially health and security.  Higher crimes and more diseases associated with unplanned developments

4. and government has not acknowledged the serious chaos existing within land use planning- housing, road railway, telephony and infrastructure,

5. AIM OF THE STUDY : how do we correct ubiquitous unsound developments?  Contribute to rapid, effective solutions as environment experts with primarily government ownership of the problem and then, participation

6. Closely examine the discipline of land use planning and its potential for solutions

7.  Acknowledge that nothing will change without political and administrative will and participation

8. Strengths  Experienced peers- good examples from developed countries

9. Limitations  Absence of Government stewardship  Scale of existing problem  Resources

10. Study Strategy –Quest for Solutions  Use Literature particularly environment codes, information from the ground/hands-on experience, peers