1. HAWTHORNE SCHOLASTIC ACADEMY STATE OF THE SCHOOL - 11.10.2015

2. OBJECTIVES Share school data in order to reflect on accomplishments and priorities for SY16 Engage in public Q&A regarding school data Deepen understanding of work done towards achieving the school vision

3. HSA – ACHIEVING THE VISION Vision – Hawthorne students will be intrinsically motivated to pursue opportunities for learning. They will be creative, independent thinkers and problem solvers, able to satisfy their quest for knowledge through all forms of collaboration and communication. Hawthorne students will contribute positively to their local and global community through their awareness of socio-economic and cultural diversities.

4. CIWP PRIORITIES Writing – Process and practices Reading – Improving comprehension through text and strategies Math – Standards of Mathematical Practice Science – Conceptual shifts in Science standards MTSS – Fidelity to structures, and improved processes SEL – Embedding SEL standards into the instructional da

5. CPS SCHOOL RATING: 1+ (SQRP) All categories scored either a 4 or 5 out of 5 total points. Big gains in Math growth data. Attendance dipped, as did reading growth for DL students.

8. NETWORK HIGHLIGHTS 2 nd in Network for Reading Growth 1 st in Network for Math Growth 1 st in Network for percentage of students meeting growth targets 3 rd in Network for Hispanic Reading growth 2 nd in Network for African-American Reading growth 3 rd in Network for Diverse Learning Reading growth 1 st in Network for Hispanic Math growth 2 nd in Network for African-American Math growth 1 st in Network for Diverse Learning Math growth 1 st in Network for Reading and Math attainment

9. ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Objective: Progress monitor our student outcomes in order to align our instructional priorities with differentiated student need. MAP Three different tests: MPG, MAP 2-5, MAP 6-8 All students take reading exam and math three times per year Inform in-the-moment teaching practices and progress monitor BAS Assess accuracy, fluency, and comprehension levels for students All students are BAS tested 3X per year State Accountability PARCC assessment Replaced ISAT in the 2014-2015 school year Public data still not available

10. MAP ATTAINMENT SCORES Readin g 2012-132013-152014-15 Grade 298%99% Grade 398% Grade 497%99%98% Grade 596%98%99% Grade 699% Grade 799% Grade 899% Grades 2-8 99% Math2012-132013-142014-15 Grade 288%99% Grade 395%94%99% Grade 498%99% Grade 599%98%99% Grade 699% Grade 799% Grade 899% Grades 2-8 99%

11. MAP GROWTH SCORES Reading2012-132013-142014-15 Grade 378%88%84% Grade 457%85%88% Grade 550%98% Grade 693%99%97% Grade 799% Grade 864%99%96% Composi te 88%99%98% Math2012-132013-142014-15 Grade 362%92%94% Grade 498%99% Grade 596%58%99% Grade 699%68%95% Grade 799% Grade 899%70%90% Compos ite 99%92%99%

12. MAP REFLECTIONS Celebrations Increase in average attainment scores in Reading (7 RIT points) and Math (12 RIT points). Highest combined growth scores yet (99 and 98) and highest attainment RIT scores yet Attention to subgroups has lead to large attainment and growth numbers for EL, DL, AA, and Hispanic students RIT growth averages more than 1 grade level and outpaces Network and CPS Concentrations Keeping consistent growth across grades and content Growth at +90% in all grades Closing the achievement gap in regards to average RIT

13. MAP COMPARISON – READING ATTAINMENT (AVERAGE RIT)

14. MAP COMPARISON – MATH ATTAINMENT (AVERAGE RIT)

15. HSA – WHOLE SCHOOL NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANKING

16. KINDERGARTEN

17. FIRST GRADE

18. SECOND GRADE

19. THIRD GRADE

20. FOURTH GRADE

21. FIFTH GRADE

22. SIXTH GRADE

23. SEVENTH GRADE

24. EIGHTH GRADE

25. EOY BAS RESULTS BY GRADE LEVEL

26. MY VOICE, MY SCHOOL SURVEY RESULTS Survey administered by UChicago for all schools in Illinois. Rates schools in 5 domains, in comparison to all other schools based on a 1-100 scale. Growth in 4 out of 5 main categories detailed in the 5 Essentials Report! Highest scores ever: Ambitious Instruction Quality of Student Discussion Academic Press Academic Personalism

27. AREAS OF CONCENTRATION Teacher Collaborative Practices High above CPS average, but -20 from SY14 Supportive Environment Scoring in neutral range for 4 years Academic Personalism +24 in 3 years, it is still not at a range considered “strong”

28. HIGH SCHOOL DATA Jones – 6 Northside – 5 Lane Tech – 19 Payton – 4 WY – 2 Amundsen IB – 1 Von Steuben Scholars – 2 Rickover – 1 Kelvyn Park – 1 Richards – 1 Sullivan – 1 Senn – 2 Chicagoland Jewish HS – 1 Depaul College Prep – 1 Holy Trinity – 1 Lake View – 3 Lincoln Park – 7 St. Ignatius – 3 Noble – 1

29. NEXT STEPS Improving on instructional practices necessary in order to lead to consistent growth in all areas at all grades Focus on “supportive environment” CIWP Writing Navigating financial cuts and position cuts from CPS Special Education, athletics, facilities, etc.