1. Atlas Polar CDR meeting March 2 & 3, 2016 DAY 2

2. Review Latest CAD Sample screenshots from Feb 12 CAD

3. HFE review Human Factors DataReport (SDRL#S014) Draft submitted Feb 24 Waiting on “Conclusions” feedback from GDLS for finalization Occupational Health Hazard Assessment Report (SDRL S012) draft received from GDLS Feb 23 APC to review in detail and approve and submit as a deliverable Safety Assessment Report (SDRL 0130 draft received from GDLS Feb 23 APC to review in detail and approve and submit as a deliverable

4. ILS Review Completed Diagnostics Source Data (SDRL# S029) delivered Feb 24 Consumables List (SDRL# SO24) delivered Feb 9 Material Safety Data Sheets (SDRL# S023) delivered Feb 4 In Process ILS specific Crane training for 8 GDLS attendees scheduled for three days (April 19-21) at Atlas Polar –Detailed Agenda being developed with APC/GDLS

5. ILS cont’d SDRLs to Follow: after GDLS crane design “freeze” and completion of Bill of Materials, Parts Manual and Operator’s Manual S022 –Technical Documentation S025 –Spares Pricing S031 Recommended Repair Parts List S032 Production Support Parts List S027 Cataloguing Data S030 Support Equipment List Training Aids, Documentation, and Plans S038, 039, 040, 041

6. ILS cont’d APC recommends a specific and detailed ILS review meeting with GDLS later in March to review APC/Hiab progress on all ILS deliverables IF GDLS has completed and provided documents for complete “Design Freeze” by Mid March.

7. Delivery Schedule What is the current GDLS production delivery schedule? Are the first production crane deliveries required in October?

8. Delivery Cont’d What activities are planned for the first production crane? First article? Testing? Inspection? Training? APC recommends a specific meeting in Early Summer to review and plan (October?) support activities for the first crane delivery.

9. Critical Design Review Checklist GDLS/APC/Hiab to review the CDR Checklist together Item by Item to ensure all areas have been addressed and either satisfactorily closed or Actions identified and assigned, and scheduled.

10. GENERAL DYNAMICS Land Systems Date CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) PROJECT: Crane GREEN - GPROCEED, NO ISSUES FOUND. ARTIFACTS DOCUMENTED. YELLOW - YPROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) AND MITIGATION PLAN(S) MUST BE APPROVED AND DOCUMENTED. RED - RDO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) DOCUMENTED. MITIGATION PLAN(S) AND/OR ACTIONS MUST BE RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING. GRAY - TAILORED OUTNOT REQUIRED - TAILORED OUT OF PROJECT SCOPE BLACK - BNOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE) #CHECKLIST ITEM Artifact Description / Expectations STATUS (COLOR CODE) ASSIGNEEARTIFACT LOCATIONACTION ID STATUS COMMENTS 1Schedule: Present current status against planned milestones. Review future schedule milestones to ensure achievable. On track with Engineering Integrated Master Schedule / Project Schedule 2aSystem Requirements: Present understanding of System Requirements and any new or unresolved requirements issues. Review new or unresolved requirements change requests, along with supporting requirements analysis. Present status of SCNs and System Specification Release relative to current state requests. SCNs, list of requirement changes post PDR, pending changes, & proposed changes requiring approval. 2bReleased Vendor Performance Specification (VPS) 3System Solution: Perform comprehensive review of finalized system design detailing solutions down to component level. Detailed review of the final system design solutions (Physical & Functional)

11. 4aRequirements Compliance Matrix: Perform a detailed review of the current compliance and rationale for each requirement. System Specification compliance matrix summary tables showing compliance with supporting data 4bCorrective action plans for noncompliant requirements 5aWeight: Review compliance of released weights and status of weight reduction initiatives. Release weights versus budget(maximum) and target allocations 5bBreakdown of released weights to piece parts. 5cList describing current/planned/completed weight reduction initiatives, with timing and expected/actual results 6Verification Plan: Perform a detailed review of the verification plan for each requirement. Review any results from verification activities performed to date and interpret the results to determine compliance as required. Design Verification Plan and Report (DVP&R) including plans and procedures developed, planned verification dates, planned verification report submittal dates, as well as any completed verification data/results and report references. 11Paint Free Areas: Present paint free areas that have been provided. Summary of all paint free areas that have been provided and correlating purpose/requirement. GREEN - GPROCEED, NO ISSUES FOUND. ARTIFACTS DOCUMENTED. YELLOW - YPROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) AND MITIGATION PLAN(S) MUST BE APPROVED AND DOCUMENTED. RED - RDO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) DOCUMENTED. MITIGATION PLAN(S) AND/OR ACTIONS MUST BE RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING. GRAY - TAILORED OUTNOT REQUIRED - TAILORED OUT OF PROJECT SCOPE BLACK - BNOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE) #CHECKLIST ITEMArtifact Description / Expectations STATUS (COLOR CODE) ASSIGNEEARTIFACT LOCATION ACTION ID STATUS COMMENTS

12. 12aSafety Assessment: Present evaluation of detailed designs to show that solutions will meet safety requirements and standards. Review planned/completed physical assessments e.g. mockups/prototypes, including plans for upcoming integration and test phase. Detailed design safety assessments completed 12bCritical Safety Items identified & control plans documented 12cHazards logged with acceptable mitigations 14Markings & Labels: Review all marking and label configurations to ensure that design & language requirements have been met. Detailed review of completed marking and label designs. 19aRisks: Review any technical, cost, and schedule risks that have been identified, including severity analysis and handling/mitigation plans Risks assessed and tracked in register/log 19bRisk handling or mitigation plans implemented 20Issues & Action Items: Review management of issues and action items for closure or follow up according to planned dates. Show all required action items closed from previous reviews. Issue and Action Plan List/Log managed GREEN - GPROCEED, NO ISSUES FOUND. ARTIFACTS DOCUMENTED. YELLOW - YPROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) AND MITIGATION PLAN(S) MUST BE APPROVED AND DOCUMENTED. RED - RDO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) DOCUMENTED. MITIGATION PLAN(S) AND/OR ACTIONS MUST BE RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING. GRAY - TAILORED OUTNOT REQUIRED - TAILORED OUT OF PROJECT SCOPE BLACK - BNOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE) #CHECKLIST ITEMArtifact Description / Expectations STATUS (COLOR CODE) ASSIGNEEARTIFACT LOCATIONACTION ID STATUS COMMENTS

13. 22Engineering Bill of Materials (EBOM): Review status of EBOM EBOM - complete (All parts in released EBOM including fasteners & COTS items down to lowest replaceable unit) 23aBuild Plan: Present status to plans to support system integration & testing, including any prototype/mockup development and systems for GDLS- C Risk Reduction Activities. Finalized Build Plan(s) (Prototype Plan, Integration & Test Plan, etc) 23bDetailed build/integrate, test and product delivery schedule(s) 23cBuild Configuration Summary GREEN - GPROCEED, NO ISSUES FOUND. ARTIFACTS DOCUMENTED. YELLOW - YPROCEED WITH ACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) AND MITIGATION PLAN(S) MUST BE APPROVED AND DOCUMENTED. RED - RDO NOT PROCEED, UNACCEPTABLE RISK. ISSUE(S) DOCUMENTED. MITIGATION PLAN(S) AND/OR ACTIONS MUST BE RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING. GRAY - TAILORED OUTNOT REQUIRED - TAILORED OUT OF PROJECT SCOPE BLACK - BNOT APPLICABLE. (MUST IDENTIFY RATIONALE) #CHECKLIST ITEMArtifact Description / Expectations STATUS (COLOR CODE) ASSIGNEEARTIFACT LOCATIONACTION ID STATUS COMMENTS

14. CDR Completion What are the next steps to complete the CDR objectives? ”The objective of CDR is to ensure that the system under review can proceed into system fabrication, demonstration, and test” Shall a subsequent finalization meeting be held soon to ‘freeze” and release the Hiab 133ATD-2 crane specification and design? In approximately two weeks?

15. Summary Q &A WRAP UP Thank you!