4. Anderson School Accreditation

5. We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing a curriculum that challenges and engages all students  Implementing research based strategies to maximize student learning  Monitoring and supporting each student’s achievement

6. 3 Big Ideas of A PLC Learning Collaboration Results  What is it we want our students to learn?  How will we know if each student has learned it?  How will we respond when some students do not learn it?  What will we do when they have learned it?

7. New Accountability Measures Two “levels” of Accountability Scorecards: District Scorecards & School Scorecards Scorecards will use a color coding system (green, lime, yellow, orange, and red) to indicate school performance.

8. New Accountability Measures Combines traditional accountability metrics with Top-to-Bottom labels and other state/federal requirements. Overall color is determined by Top to Bottom status as well as points earned by meeting traditional AYP requirements. Individual “cells” use red/yellow/green coding scheme Points-based system where full points earned for meeting a target, half points earned for meeting safe harbor

9. Accountability Scorecard

10. The Results from MI School Data –Mathematics = Green –Reading = Green –Social Studies = Green –Science = Green –Writing = Green –Attendance Rate = Green –Educator Evals = Green –Compliance Factors = Green –Students with Disabilities = RED, due to score in Mathematics

11. 34/44 points = 77.27%

12. The Results from MI School Data Michigan Department of Education –Overall = Yellow –Top to Bottom Ranking = 78 –Yearly Adequate Progress = Made –Education YES! Grade = B –AcademicTargets Met: 16/16

13. GRADE 3 RESULTS

14. 3 rd Grade Reading Trend Data

15. 3rd Grade Math Trend Data

16. GRADE 4 RESULTS

17. 4 th Grade Reading Trend Data

18. 4 th Grade Writing Trend Data

19. 4 th Grade Mathematics Trend Data

20. GRADE 5 RESULTS

21. 5 th Grade Reading Trend Data

22. 5 th Grade Mathematics Trend Data

23. 5 th Grade Science Trend Data

24. How do we keep our GREEN? By maintaining progress consistent with growth from the 2011-2012 school year. Data analysis on an annual basis will provide feedback in areas that we may need to improve.

25. Content Area: Mathematics Student Goal Statement: 100% of all students will demonstrate a proficiency target of 68.24 in Mathematics by 6/9/2016 Statement of Gap in Student Achievement: The data indicates a gap between students with and without disabilities AND our Top 30% and Bottom 30% Sources of Data used to Identify Gap in Student Achievement: MEAP scores, MAP scores, CLASS A, etc.

26. Content Area: Writing Student Goal Statement: 100% of all students will demonstrate a proficiency target in writing of 66.56 in English/Language Arts by 6/9/2016 Statement of Gap in Student Achievement:. The data indicates a significant gap between our Top 30% and Bottom 30% Sources of Data used to Identify Gap in Student Achievement: MEAP scores, MAP scores, CLASS A, etc

27. Content Area: Reading Student Goal Statement: 100% of All Students will demonstrate a proficiency target of 80.88 in English Language Arts by 6/9/2016 as measured by the state assessment. Statement of Gap in Student Achievement: The data indicates a significant gap between our Top 30% and Bottom 30% in all tested areas EXCEPT READING Sources of Data used to Identify Gap in Student Achievement: MEAP scores, MAP scores, CLASS A, etc

28. Content Area: Science Student Goal Statement: 100% of all students will demonstrate a proficiency target in writing of 46.39 in Science by 6/9/2016 as measured by the state assessment. Statement of Gap in Student Achievement: The data indicates a significant gap between our Top 30% and Bottom 30% Sources of Data used to Identify Gap in Student Achievement: MEAP scores, MAP scores, CLASS A, etc

29. Content Area: Environment Goal 5 is to provide an environment that maximizes growth, citizenship, and academic achievement for all students.

30. Anderson Elementary = Title I Target School Federal Program that is designed to help disadvantaged children meet high academic standards; to help children who are failing or most at risk of failing to meet the district’s core academic curriculum standards

31. Title I Continued Title I is a Federal program that targets students considered to be at risk for falling below grade level in reading or math Title I money is calculated from the amount of students who get free and reduced lunch Districts are asked to spend the money on either staffing or materials that directly benefit Title I students

32. TA Program Required Components 1. Needs Assessment2. Services for Eligible Students3. Incorporated Into Existing School Program Planning4. Instructional Strategies5. Title I and Regular Education Coordination6. Instruction by Highly Qualified Staff7. High-Quality and Ongoing Professional Development8. Strategies to Increase Parent Involvement9. Coordination of Title I and other Resources10. Ongoing Review of Student Progress

33. Title I Continued Interventionists: highly qualified teachers with special training in reading Title I aides - Math Materials and Training such as: 1.Fountas and Pinnell leveled reading series 2.Making Meaning 3.STAR Reader 4.Michigan Literacy Progress Profile training

34. Title I Continued The goal is to have a 12-16 week intervention, get students back to grade level and withdraw them from the program If a student is not exited, then other options will be examined The classroom teacher and the interventionist will decide if a student is ready to discontinue.

35. Services for Eligible Students Hedke  District Title I Preschool  Reading Recovery/ Literacy Teacher  Instructional Paraprofessional  Hours for Extended Time Learning Anderson .5 Literacy Teacher  Instructional  District Title I Preschool  Paraprofessional  Hours for Extended Time Learning Services included as strategies in SIP

36. Anderson Elementary – A school for All-Stars

37. Thank you for attending!