Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClaud Spencer Modified over 8 years ago
1
Deep Dive into MERLOT LOR SHERRI.RESTAURI@UAH.EDU SHERRI.RESTAURI@UAH.EDU @SHERRIRESTAURI MARCH 2016
2
Peer Review Evaluation Process (2 unique reviews + Composite Review by Editor) Experts (Peers) Quality Measures Rubric
3
History California State University - 1997 Pilot Program: –University System of Georgia –Oklahoma State Board of Regents –University of North Carolina Board of Regents 4 Disciplines Expansion –10 Systems –8 Campus Partners –23 Disciplines
4
Structure of MERLOT Staff (Cal State University) –6 people on Management team –2 Developers and Programmers Project Directors –Represent Partners –Set direction of MERLOT Editors of Disciplines Editorial Board Members
5
MERLOT Editorial Discipline Boards Organized like journal editorial board –Editor –Board Members Associate Editors Peer Reviewers
6
MERLOT Editorial Boards Agriculture & Environmental Sciences Biology Business Chemistry Communication Sciences Criminal Justice Engineering English Faculty Development Fire Safety Health Sciences History Information Technology Library and Information Services Math Music Physics Psychology Sociology Statistics Teacher Education Technical Allied Health World Languages Virtual Environments
7
2 Stage Peer Review Process Stage 1 –Triage Stage 2 –At least 2 Individual Reviewers complete the review –Editor combines Review into Composite Review –Composite Review is sent to Author for approval Once Author approves, post the Review
8
Differences - MERLOT vs. Journal Evaluate teaching materials, not research articles MERLOT has Peer Review Training Actual Peer Review appears on MERLOT site, so can read what has been evaluated Write an appreciation letter at end of year Invitation to join Board with 5 reviews. Peer Reviewer Extraordinaire
9
Copyright MERLOT Peer Review Report Description 1.Overview 2.Learning Goals 3.Type of Material 4.Target Student Population 5.Prerequisite Knowledge 6.Recommended Uses 7.Technical Requirements
10
MERLOT Peer Review Report Evaluations (Number) Observations (Strengths and Concerns) Criteria –Quality of Content –Potential Effectiveness as Teaching/Learning Tool –Ease of Use
11
MERLOT GRAPE Camp Three week session One hour per week webinar Homework Peer Review Training Practice Peer Review Assigned to Editorial Board Certificate
12
Explore MERLOT www.merlot.org Locate content Post content Evaluate, Discuss, & Share Content Bookmark content for later Build content—Content Builder Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.