Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0."— Presentation transcript:

1 Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0

2 What’s Hot What’s Not Should Be Hot Should Not Be Hot Adolescent Literacy Comprehension Literacy Coaches Family Literacy Technology Direct Instruction Writing

3 Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” Educational-Political Timely Topics Published meta-analyses Consumer Needs/Requests Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review

4 Typical Stages of a Systematic Review Title Registration Protocol Review Update

5 1) Name and affiliation of primary reviewer: 2) Name(s) and affiliation(s) of co-reviewer(s): 3) Provisional title: 4) Objective: 5) Rationale for review / background: Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group

6 [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group 6)Method Types of studies included Types of participants included Types of interventions Types of outcomes Quality appraisal procedures Methods for data extraction Quality assurance procedures

7 Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group 7) Roles/responsibilities/expertise of review team Content Systematic review methods Information retrieval Statistical analysis (meta-analysis)

8 Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] 8)Support required (any support/guidance required): 9) Contact details of primary reviewer: Name: Title: Affiliation: Address 1: Address 2: City: State, Province or County: Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group

9 Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group [w1] Is this what you had in mind?[w1] [w2] Is it types of ‘outcome measures’ (e.g., standardized tests) or ‘measures’ (e.g., sound blending, math computations,e tc)??[w2] [w3] If this is analogous to the Cochrane A-B-C rating we probably need to give an e.g.—this has not been a well discussed process in C2.[w3] 10)Approximate date for submission of DRAFT PROTOCOL (please note this should be no longer than 6 months after title approval): 11) Approximate date for submission of DRAFT REVIEW (please note this should be no longer than one year after title approval): Title Registration Form Campbell Collaboration Education Coordinating Group


Download ppt "Sources of Topics for a Systematic Review Personal Interest Personal Expertise/Background Professional “Hot Topics” 4.0."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google