1. UNCLASSIFIED National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead Mr Hal Hagemeier Deputy Director, National Security Space Office 14-15 October 2010 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

2. UNCLASSIFIED 11-Jun-16 2 National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead What walls might we run into? How big might they be? How might we avoid them? If unavoidable, how might we get on the other side? PA CLEARED 2010-0576

3. UNCLASSIFIED Overview National PNT Architecture Development and Transition Implementation Plan Implementation Plan Alignment Reference Materials 3 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

4. UNCLASSIFIED Eighteen month effort: –31 civil and military Federal agencies –200+ people Provide more effective and efficient PNT capabilities to USG Vision, Strategy, Vectors and Recommendations approved June 2008 Without Enterprise Architecture Strategy Capability Should-Be Architecture Evolved Baseline (EBL) As-Is Architecture System Emphasis Architecture Emphasis Now 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years Near & Mid - Term Decisions Guided by Architecture Based on Long-Term Vision National PNT Architecture 4 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

5. UNCLASSIFIED Development & Transition Planning Process         Identified Capability Gaps Developed Recommendations to Address Capability Gaps Defined Implementation Tasks by Recommendation Implementation Plan Integrates Tasks & Highlights Near- Term Priorities Architecture Development Architecture Transition Planning 5 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

6. UNCLASSIFIED Implementation Plan Approved July 2010 map to National PNT Architecture strategy, vectors, and recommendations40+ tasks map to National PNT Architecture strategy, vectors, and recommendations Places PNT community on a path to achieve 2025 “Should- Be” Architecture 6 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

7. UNCLASSIFIED Implementation Plan Alignment Architecture identified four vectors and 19 principal recommendations 18 of 19 Recommendations in Implementation Plan “Cooperative Organizational Structures” –Team couldn't achieve consensus on appropriate implementation tasks and balance between: Department and agency roles and responsibilities Resources for implementation Structures able to monitor and facilitate implementation 7 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

8. UNCLASSIFIED Reference Materials National Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Architecture Study Final Report, Sept 2008 –Includes study Terms of Reference –Describes development methodology and alternate architectures evaluated –Describes architecture vision, strategy, vectors, and recommendations –Includes Architecture Guidance Memo approving these and directing transition planning National Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Architecture Implementation Plan, April 2010 –Includes Architecture Implementation Memo approving plan –Highlights necessary and immediate tasks to implement the architecture, organized by vector Both documents are available to the public at http://www.acq.osd.mil/nsso/pnt/pnt.htm http://www.acq.osd.mil/nsso/pnt/pnt.htm 8 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

9. UNCLASSIFIED National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead Perform an independent assessment of the way ahead for the National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan. What can the Departments and Agencies do to ensure the successful implementation of the Plan? What sort of organizational, functional, or technical issues does the Board believe may impede successful implementation of the Plan? How can the Departments and Agencies reduce the likelihood that these impediments occur? How can the Departments and Agencies reduce the effect these impediments may have? 9 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

10. UNCLASSIFIED 10 Points of Contact Mr Hal Hagemeier –Deputy Director, NSSO –Hal.Hagemeier@osd.milHal.Hagemeier@osd.mil –571-432-1403 CAPT Kevin Andersen –Chief, PNT Division, NSSO –nsso.pnt@osd.milnsso.pnt@osd.mil –571-432-1433 http://www.acq.osd.mil/nsso/pnt/pnt.htm PA CLEARED 2010-0576

11. UNCLASSIFIED 11 PA CLEARED 2010-0576