Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBuck Clarke Modified over 8 years ago
1
B. Todd, A. Apollonio, M. Kwiatkowski, R. Schmidt, S. Wagner, J. Walter a Risk-Based Approach 1v2 to Machine Protection Systems
2
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Risk Based Approach to Machine Protection 1. Machine Protection in Context safety – protection – plant 2. Protection System Lifecycle assessing and specifying 3. Conclusions future work, and outlook Machine Protection fits between System Safety and Plant Systems assessment of powering system outlined, with risks & functions analysis of high risk failure cases life-cycle concept can be adapted from system safety to machine protection assessment of current implementations & specification of future
3
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 3 [11] Vacuum Pressure Vacuum Pump Speed Control Fulfill operational requirements Plant Systems: Vacuum Example: maintain correct pressure
4
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 4 [11] Vacuum Pressure Vacuum Pump Speed Control Vacuum Pressure Vacuum Valve Actuator Ensure plant stays within limits Plant Protection: Fulfill operational requirements Plant Systems: Vacuum Example: maintain correct pressure bad pressure = close valves
5
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 5 [11] Vacuum Pump Speed Control Vacuum Pressure Vacuum Valve Actuator Sensors, Actuators and Process may be combined No rules regarding combination Must meet functional requirement Ensure plant stays within limits Fulfill operational requirements Plant Systems:
6
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 6 [11] Access doors Beam absorbers personnel safe but machine at risk People in perimeter – stop machine Personnel Safety System: cannot be merged with plants Must meet legal requirement E.G. “function must meet IEC 61508 SIL 3”
7
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 7 [11] Prevent damage to machine Prevent undue stress to components Machine Protection System: No rules regarding implementation Must meet functional requirement
8
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 8 [11] powering protection closely coupled to powering plant Prevent damage to machine Prevent undue stress to components Machine Protection System: No rules regarding implementation Must meet functional requirement
9
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Safety – Protection – Plant 9 [11] Personnel Safety System: Plant Systems: Machine Protection System: danger will exist – prevent – extract energy danger exists – protect – extract energy
10
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Protection System Lifecycle
11
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Inspired by IEC 61508 Protection System Lifecycle
12
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Protection System Lifecycle Assess Existing Design System systems involved in protection are unique certain technologies used have never been tried on this scale before high cost of failure development and analysis of machine protection as if it were a safety system worked example Dipole Magnet Protection – 9GJ Protection System Lifecycle
13
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch CERN Protection System Lifecycle
14
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 154 in series
15
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch QuenchDamage protectprevent 154 in series
16
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Resistive zone appears in a magnet I 2 R losses begin Zone heats up (heat propagates to neighbouring magnets) Damage to magnets Hazard Chain: from Quench to Damage… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue 154 in series
17
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Resistive zone appears in a magnet I 2 R losses begin Zone heats up (heat propagates to neighbouring magnets) Damage to magnets Hazard Chain: from Quench to Damage… What Protection Functions and Protection Systems are in place? Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping 154 in series
18
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping
19
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Detection Power Abort when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping
20
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Quench Heater when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping
21
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Resistor Extraction Switch when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping Energy Extraction Loop
22
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Powering Loop when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping
23
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping Escape Diode
24
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch when quench occurs… Failure Hazard Chain Failure Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 prior experience deep thinking simulations prototyping
25
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch classify probability and consequence using risk matrix risk, if function didn’t exist, according to system experts… Colour boundaries, probabilities, consequences machine dependent e.g. Annika’s Talk Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
26
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch classify probability and consequence using risk matrix risk, if function didn’t exist, according to system experts… Colour boundaries, probabilities, consequences machine dependent e.g. Annika’s Talk Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
27
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Risk Matrix Risk Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
28
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch determine risk reduction level using matrix Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
29
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch = reliability requirements determine risk reduction level using matrix Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 RRL Matrix RRL Catalogue
30
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch = reliability requirements RRL Matrix RRL Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 determine risk reduction level using matrix
31
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch RRL Matrix RRL Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
32
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch RRL Matrix RRL Catalogue Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1
33
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch expected assess actual? Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 Assess existing system implementation: coverage, quality … How do we qualify a system meets a level? How about programmable logic? See paper…
34
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Turn off Power Converter = purple = 3 Propagate Quench = orange = 2 Extract Energy = purple = 3 Link Related Circuits = green = 1 Assess existing system implementation: coverage, quality … expected assess actual? How do we qualify a system meets a level? How about programmable logic? See paper…
35
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008
36
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 36 commissioning circuit to 5 TeV = 9kA
37
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 37 commissioning circuit to 5 TeV = 9kA
38
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 38 commissioning circuit to 5 TeV = 9kA
39
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 39 commissioning circuit to 5 TeV = 9kA Interconnect
40
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Magnet Protection 40 Magnet Interconnect
41
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Superconducting Cable Tin – Silver Foils Longditudinal View – filled with Solder Cross Section View Superconducting Cable Copper Stabiliser [1]
42
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch [1]
43
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Magnet Protection 43 electrical arc punctures helium line [2]
44
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 1. Pressure Wave propagates inside insulation vacuum enclosure 2. Rapid Pressure Rise Self actuating relief valves could not handle pressure Design: 2Kg He/s Incident: ~20 kg He/s 3. Forces on the vacuum barriers Design: 1.5 bar Incident: ~8 bar Quadrupoles Displaced by ~50 cm Cryogenic line connections damaged Vacuum to atmospheric pressure [1]
45
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Incident location Dipole Bus bar [1]
46
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 1: September 2008 Quadrupole-dipole interconnection Quadrupole support Main Damage Area: 700m 39 dipoles 14 quadrupoles [1]
47
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Hazard Chain had been identified in initial stages… Probability classified as negligible Risk Reduction Level was therefore minimum Installation did not conform …
48
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2009 - nQPS 48
49
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2009 - nQPS 49 Interconnect impedance is measured Energy Extracted if impedance unacceptable
50
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2009 - overall repair and consolidation 14 quadrupole magnets replaced 204 interconnections repaired 4km beam-tube cleaned longitudinal restraining system quadrupoles 900 ports for helium pressure release 6500 new detectors and 250km cables for new Interconnect Protection System collateral damage mitigation 39 dipole magnets replaced [1]
51
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2013-14: Interconnect Reworking [3, 4] 10170 interconnects to be re-worked…
52
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2013-14: Interconnect Reworking [1, 2] 10170 interconnects to be re-worked…
53
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch 2013-14: Interconnect Reworking [1, 2] 10170 interconnects to be re-worked…
54
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Failure Case 2: January 2013
55
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch quench tests forced a quadrupole magnet quench, all four protection functions failed to activate Six months earlier a thunderstorm tripped several QPS detectors Piquet team needed to manually intervene to rearm Post-Analysis: mitigation of this need by new firmware, piquet did not intervene Firmware update was not applied to this particular circuit Post-Analysis: time and revalidation pressure Missing rearm does not prevent the circuit from being powered Circuit powered and unprotected for six months Event was repeated as failure of protection functions was not identified immediately Failure of this nature on dipole circuit represents most critical risk level for CERN.
56
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch QPS protection functions do not meet required RRL 1.Qualification of QPS Functions 2. Addition of Independent Energy Extraction Loop
57
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch In Conclusion…
58
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Today: done using a deep-thinking argumentative approach Information is there, not organised
59
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Today: done using a deep-thinking argumentative approach Information is there, not organised If we work outside to inside = protection assessment
60
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Protection Functions System Specifications Today: done using a deep-thinking argumentative approach Information is there, not organised If we work outside to inside = protection assessment If we work left to right = protection as a safety system build protection cases Stakeholders may want proof that their investment is secure e.g. Annika’s Talk
61
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch Fin! Thank You!
62
CERN benjamin.todd@cern.ch References P. LeBrun - LHC Performance Workshop 2009 http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceOtherViews.py?&confId=45433 http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=36&sessionId=0&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=45433 [1] 62 Welding Interconnections on Sector 3-4, CERN Photography Service, http://cds.cern.ch/record/1225482#04 [2] J.-P. Tock - LHC Performance Workshop 2012 https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceOtherViews.py?&confId=164089 [3] CERN, EDMS Document #1171853[4]
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.