Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySilas Sullivan Modified over 8 years ago
1
Chapter 9
2
After reading this chapter, students should be able to Discuss the judiciary as a political branch of government. Describe the major players in the judicial system, including the central roles of the attorney general, the bar, and lawyers in the process. Understand the structure of the Texas Court system from the lowest courts to the two “supreme” courts. Compare the roles of grand juries and trial juries. Evaluate major issues in the Texas judiciary, including problems with crime, problems with judicial selection, and issues of equality in the administration of justice. 2
3
3
4
American ideal is that of nonpolitical judge, impartial and incorruptible Judicial decisions are interpretations, choices among competing interests Judges make laws / constitution in the process of interpretation Discussion: Are judges a component of the political process? 4
5
Judicial election makes the political nature of the job even more obvious Not all partisan judges agree with others in their party Ex.: Abortion case 5
6
Attorney General—represents the state / agencies in court Gives advisory opinions on constitutional / statutory issues Lawyers—must be trained and pass state bar exam Practicing lawyers—must be members of State Bar of Texas 6
7
Discussion: Is the court system in Texas inefficient and disorganized? Some courts have duplicate jurisdiction One court may try cases and hear appeals Not all courts keep official records System not standardized 7
8
Original jurisdiction / original trial court Concurrent jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction Exclusive jurisdiction Civil jurisdiction Criminal jurisdiction 8
9
9
10
Established by city charter, ordinance Judges usually appointed Exclusive jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances Minor criminal cases Concurrent jurisdiction with justice courts No civil cases; majority of cases traffic 10
11
Judges elected, not required to be lawyers duties are broad, from conducting preliminary hearings to serving as the county’s coroner Original trial jurisdiction in minor criminal cases, minor civil matters 11
12
Established by Texas Constitution Judges elected, not required to be lawyers judicial responsibilities and oversees commissioner's court Original, appellate jurisdiction in criminal and civil cases 12
13
Specialized county courts— established by the Legislature May hear only civil, criminal, probate, or appellate cases—or a combination Judges must be attorneys 13
14
Principal trial courts for the state Judges elected; attorneys w/ 4 years experience Varied caseload - felony criminal trials, divorces, civil suits Some concurrent jurisdiction with county courts on civil issues Each county must have juvenile court 14
15
Intermediate appellate jurisdiction, civil and criminal cases Consider only written records from trial and oral arguments of counsel Do not hear death penalty appeals 15
16
14 Courts of Appeal Each with a specific geographical region Justices elected, 6 year term Must have 10 years experience Multi-judge panel, no jury En banc, panel of 3 16
17
One of two high appellate courts Only criminal matters Writs of error, writs of habeas corpus 9 elected judges, 6 year term Normally 3-judge panels In rare cases, rulings can be appealed to U.S. Supreme Court 17
18
One of two high appellate courts Civil, juvenile appeals Original jurisdiction limited Writs of error, writs of mandamus Other duties Ex.: judicial removals Ex.: Law schools, bar exam 18
19
Grand juries – determine indictment Selected by jury commissioners 12 people, set term Trial juries – determine guilt, innocence Lower courts – juries of 6 District court – juries of 12 19
20
Texas Department of Public Safety County sheriff’s offices Local police departments Coordination / cooperation - sometimes haphazard, sometimes effective 20
21
State Bar of Texas grievance committees Impeachment by legislature Supreme Court—remove district judges District court—remove lower court judges 21
22
State Commission on Judicial Conduct Censure, reprimand, removal Punishment rare 22
23
Too much crime, too many criminals Crime rate moderating Juvenile offenses high Courts, prisons overloaded Community-based treatment programs Plea bargains Discussion: what should Texas do about its criminal justice issues? 23
24
Balancing independence, accountability 6 Methods Partisan elections (Texas) Nonpartisan elections Legislative appointment Gubernatorial appointment Merit plan Combination 24
25
Ideal of impartiality vs. reality Partisanship may influence rulings Campaigns privately funded Appearance of justice “for sale” Ohio study JCFA ineffective Discussion: Should we reform judicial selection in Texas? 25
26
Legal representation to indigents unfair? Texas Bar Foundation study Reliance on private attorneys— inexperienced, distracted Discussion: Should Texas move to a system of public defenders? 26
27
27
28
Inadequate representation especially problematic in death penalty cases Analysis by Chuck Lindell found bungled death penalty appeals “worst lawyers,” “sham review” DNA analysis has resulted in some releases of those wrongfully convicted 28
29
29
30
Convicted of capital murder, sentenced to death Arson discredited, witness recanted Stay of execution denied Executed in 2004 30
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.