Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.

Published byGillian Owens Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical."— Presentation transcript:

1 GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical & Physical Geodesy (IAPG) Technische Universität München 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014

2 2. GOCE-based Gravity Field Models  Overview  Signal Characteristics 3. Performance Analysis  Estimated Errors  External Validation  Geoid Accuracy 4. Summary Outline 1. High Level Processing Facility

3 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 High Level Processing Facility Universität Bern, Astronomisches Institut, Switzerland Politechnico di Milano, DIIAR Sezione Rilevamento Italy Technische Universität Graz, Institut für Theoretische Geodäsie und Satellitengeodäsie, Austria Universität Bonn, Institut für Geodäsie & Geoinformation, Germany Delft University of Technology, Astrodynamics and Space Missions, The Netherlands SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Nils Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Dept. 1 Geodesy and Remote Sensing, Germany Centre Nationale d‘Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France PI & Project Management: Technische Universität München, Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie, Germany

4 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 High Level Processing Facility The people behind the HPF (only some of them)

5 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Overview of GOCE Models ESA Rel. 5 GOCE Models

6 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Overview of GOCE Models GFZ/CNES Other GOCO

7 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Overview of GOCE Models ESA Release 5 GOCE Models Characteristics DIR5TIM5 Maximum D/O300280 GOCE Data Volume01.11.09-20.10.13; ~3.5 yrs (net) Gravity GradientsV xx, V yy, V zz, V xz >400 Mio. Obs.V xx, V yy, V zz, V xz >439 Mio. Obs. Gradient FilterBand-pass filterARMA filter per segment (87) GOCE SST (GPS)-Short arc approach (d/o 150) GRACE SST (K-Band)2003-2012 GRGS RL03 (d/o 130) - LAGEOS 1/2 (SLR)1985-2010, ~25 yrs- Regularizationspherical cap based on GRACE/LAGEOS. Kaula zero constraint (d/o > 180) Kaula zero constraint (near zonals and for d/o > 200)

8 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Degree Variances (GOCE RL5 vs. earlier Models) Full Signal Content up to d/o 210-220. Goal was d/o 200 Signal Characteristic

9 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Map Source: Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S., Kenyon, S., Factor, J. 2012. “The Development and Evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008).” Journal of Geophysical Research 117 EGM2008 Data Coverage 12.0% of Land 42.9% of Land 45.1% of Land Signal Characteristic

10 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Characteristic GOCE vs. EGM2008 Gravity Anomalies [mgal] (up to d/o 200) RMS of Differences in Test Area [mgal] Gravity Anomalies Signal Rel. 1Rel. 2Rel. 3Rel. 4Rel. 5 TIM3.14 DIR1.07

11 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Characteristic GOCE vs. EGM2008 Gravity Anomalies [mgal] (up to d/o 200) RMS of Differences in Test Area [mgal] Rel. 1Rel. 2Rel. 3Rel. 4Rel. 5 TIM3.142.05 DIR1.072.28 Gravity Anomalies Signal

12 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Characteristic GOCE vs. EGM2008 Gravity Anomalies [mgal] (up to d/o 200) RMS of Differences in Test Area [mgal] Rel. 1Rel. 2Rel. 3Rel. 4Rel. 5 TIM3.142.051.55 DIR1.072.281.85 Gravity Anomalies Signal

13 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Characteristic GOCE vs. EGM2008 Gravity Anomalies [mgal] (up to d/o 200) RMS of Differences in Test Area [mgal] Rel. 1Rel. 2Rel. 3Rel. 4Rel. 5 TIM3.142.051.551.03 DIR1.072.281.851.00 Gravity Anomalies Signal

14 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Signal Characteristic GOCE vs. EGM2008 Gravity Anomalies [mgal] (up to d/o 200) RMS of Differences in Test Area [mgal] Rel. 1Rel. 2Rel. 3Rel. 4Rel. 5 TIM3.142.051.551.030.71 DIR1.072.281.851.000.70 Gravity Anomalies Signal

15 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Estimated Errors Coefficient Standard Deviations (log10) GOCE-DIR4GOCE-TIM4 GOCE-TIM5 GOCE-DIR5

16 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Estimated Errors Cummulative Geoid Errors from Coefficient Errors 0.8 cm (d/o 200) 3.4 cm (d/o 200) 4.3 cm (d/o 220) 12.5 cm (d/o 280) 1.2 cm (d/o 220) 4.9 cm (d/o 300)

17 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Estimated Errors Maps of Geoid Error from VCM Propagation (Full Resolution) Degree/Order & Area TIM5 [cm] DIR5 [cm] 200 Global 200 Germany 220 Global 220 Germany Full Global12.54.9 Full Germany10.04.5 Geoid Error Comparison (Global from cum. Error Degree Variances, Germany from VCM Propagation) TIM5 DIR5

18 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Estimated Errors Maps of Geoid Error from VCM Propagation (Degree/Order 220) Degree/Order & Area TIM5 [cm] DIR5 [cm] 200 Global 200 Germany 220 Global4.31.2 220 Germany2.40.8 Full Global12.54.9 Full Germany10.04.5 Geoid Error Comparison (Global from cum. Error Degree Variances, Germany from VCM Propagation) TIM5 DIR5

19 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Estimated Errors Maps of Geoid Error from VCM Propagation (Degree/Order 200) Degree/Order & Area TIM5 [cm] DIR5 [cm] 200 Global3.40.8 200 Germany1.40.5 220 Global4.31.2 220 Germany2.40.8 Full Global12.54.9 Full Germany10.04.5 Geoid Error Comparison (Global from cum. Error Degree Variances, Germany from VCM Propagation) TIM5 DIR5

20 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation GPS Levelling Data for Gravity Field Validation Map Source: Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S., Kenyon, S., Factor, J. 2012. “The Development and Evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008).” Journal of Geophysical Research 117 EGM2008 Data Coverage & Coverage of GPS/Levelling Data 12.0% of Land 42.9% of Land 45.1% of Land GPS/ LEVELLING POINTS

21 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Germany 2.7 cm 2.9 cm Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by BKG, Frankfurt/Main

22 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Germany 2.7 cm 2.9 cm Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by BKG, Frankfurt/Main

23 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE, Directorate of Geosciences - DGC, Coordination of Geodesy - CGED Australia Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by AUSLIG. Brazil

24 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Canada Europe (EUREF EUVN) Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by National Resources of Canada (NRCan).

25 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for Japan have been provided for validation purposes by the Japanese Geographical Survey Institute Greece Japan Acknowledgement: Access to GPS levelling data for GREECE has been provided by technical University Thesssaloniki.

26 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Acknowledgement: GPS levelling data for have been provided for validation purposes by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology KACST. Saudi Arabia United Kingdom

27 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) USA (2009 Data Set) Finland (EUREF EUVN)

28 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Model Validation RMS of Geoid Differences at GPS-Levelling Points after planar Fit (Omission Error estimated from EGM2008) Areas with High Quality GPS/Levelling Data AreaRMS [cm]No. Points Germany2.8675 UK3.9177 Netherlands (EUREF)1.815 Sweden (EUREF)2.684 USA2009 - DC1.916 USA2009 – MD2.4511 USA2009 - NH2.614 USA2009 - NJ2.5326 USA2009 - RI2.229 USA2009 - MN3.34089

29 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 What is the GOCE Geoid Accuracy ?  Estimated error from GOCE-DIR5 at D/O 200 in Germany (formal): 0.5 cm  Estimated error from GOCE-TIM5 at D/O 200 in Germany (calibrated based on gradient residuals): 1.4 cm  Differences at GPS/Levelling Stations in Germany for both models at D/O 200 (after planar fit): 2.8 cm  GPS/Levelling geoid error is composed by:  GPS height error: ≈ 1.5 cm  Normal height accuracy after planar fit: ≈ 1.5 cm  Total after error propagation: 2.1 cm  Attempt to derive a realistic error:  GOCE geoid error (reverse error propagation) → 1.8 cm

30 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Summary  Full signal of GOCE-based satellite-only model up to degree and order 210-220.  Fit to “quiet” ocean area at a level of 0.7 mgal in terms of gravity anomaly or 2.6 cm in terms of geoid – geoid more sensitive to dynamic ocean topography.  Estimated cumulative geoid error at d/o 200 for Germany, 0.5 and 1.4 cm respectively.  GPS-leveling fits significantly improved wrt. release 4 models (now 2.8 cm RMS in Germany, about 1 cm better than rel. 4).  Estimated absolute geoid error of rel. 5 models at d/o 200 roughly 1.8 cm or better.

31 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, 25.11.2014 Summary The GOCE Cup

Download ppt "GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical."

Similar presentations

Impact of GOCE on lithospheric modelling in active plate margins ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 Edinburgh, 10-09-2013 Michael Hosse (1), Roland Pail.

Impact of GOCE on lithospheric modelling in active plate margins ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013 Edinburgh, Michael Hosse (1), Roland Pail.
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.

Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.

ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)

From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
Nordic Geodetic Commision, WG for Geodynamics, Annual Meeting 2005, Masala /Finland, May 3-4 Fennoscandian Uplift Observed with Absolute Gravity Measurements.

Nordic Geodetic Commision, WG for Geodynamics, Annual Meeting 2005, Masala /Finland, May 3-4 Fennoscandian Uplift Observed with Absolute Gravity Measurements.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.

COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 23 The gravity.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 23 The gravity.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &

J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.

Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.

Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,

Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.

Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.

1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, 29.6.2010 T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)

ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)

Similar presentations

Ads by Google