1. F ACULTY OF S OCIAL AND H UMAN S CIENCIES – N EW U NIVERSITY OF L ISBON DEMOCRACY BEYOND THE STATE Case Study: Good Governance in Social NGOs, in Portugal ESA CONFERENCE CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA: SOCIETAL ROLE, CHALLENGES, DYNAMICS Sassari, 1-2 October 2012 Camila Rodrigues DEMOCRACY BEYOND THE STATE Case Study: Good Governance in Social NGOs, in Portugal ESA CONFERENCE CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA: SOCIETAL ROLE, CHALLENGES, DYNAMICS Sassari, 1-2 October 2012 Camila Rodrigues

2. Theory of Participatory Democracy The existence of representative institutions at a national level does not constitute a sufficient guarantee of democratic quality. Socialization for democracy should occur in varied social spheres, so that the desirable psychological traits can be developed through the participatory experience, which possesses educational and integrative functions. The development of civic virtues is particularly important for social groups of lower socio-economic status, since it enhances political equality, through the promotion of their access to the governance mechanisms that affect them.

3. How far should participation go? Is it possible, and desirable, to democratize structures of authority beyond the state? Can NGOs contribute to enhance democracy unless they are themselves democratic?

4. Case Study “The participation of Social NGOs in the European Strategy for Social Inclusion, in Portugal”

5. FINGIS Non Governmental Forum for Social Inclusion

6. DIMENSIONS 1) Representativeness2) Democratic Governance Mechanisms3) Political Socialization4) Independence5) Effectiveness

7. 1) Representativeness Initiative Access Proportion Indicators

8. Limited representativeness Positive discrimination - the «most politically active» social NGOs were favored – invitation for the executive secretariat Limited mobilization - the «moderately politically active» responded to the call – application for membership Selective exclusion – the «least politically active» did not respond to the call – absence of participation

9. 2) Democratic Governance Mechanisms internal division of powers transparency of the decisional process rotativity of the executive body Indicators

10. Limited democratic governance «Crystallization»: The FNGIS presented a formal concern with the internal division of powers, the transparency of the decisional process and the rotativity of the executive body, but in practice the rotativity was not implemented

11. 3) Political Socialization Recomendation of participation Practice of participation Indicators

12. Limited political socialization Incoherence: the involvement of the target groups in the political process was formally stated but in practice the FNGIS did not promote such involvement

13. 4) Independence Public funding Private funding Own funding Indicator

14. Lack of independence Conflict of interests: the FNGIS received funding mostly from the political agents it was supposed to supervise

15. 5) Effectiveness Influence Adequacy Indicators

16. Limited Effectiveness Recognition: the FNGIS was legitimately accepted as a consulting platform by the political agents, that took its recommendations into account Up-Bottom process: the political priorities were determined at the EU and national levels, so the FNGIS’ contribution was limited

17. The problem starts with the lack of capacity the NGOs evidence wile promoting participation, which is understandable because participation implies sharing the power with the service users and recognizing them as peers, as equals. For that to happen people must have a different notion of an organization, which is a highly hierarquical structure, with several degrees, from the managers, to the social workers, to the service users. There is still a long way to go before participation can become effective.

18. CONCLUSION The Portuguese social NGOs did not constitute an effective link between the social groups of lower socio-economic status and the Strategy for Social Inclusion, that targeted them. If the SG-LSES’ interests are represented through intermediaries that don’t involve them in their own internal structure, activities and decisions, then all the potential participation has to offer is hindered rather them enhanced, and the promotion of an active citizenship is not more than mere rhetoric.