Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Celinda Lake April 6, 2016 Lake Research Partners Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com 202.776.9066 Voter Support for Food System.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Celinda Lake April 6, 2016 Lake Research Partners Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com 202.776.9066 Voter Support for Food System."— Presentation transcript:

1 Celinda Lake April 6, 2016 Lake Research Partners Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com 202.776.9066 Voter Support for Food System Improvement

2 Focus group participants understand there is a problem and want change. 2 “Our food system is not meeting everyone’s needs.” –white married mother, Des Moines, IA “I think that if they're going to subsidize junk food, why can't they flip it and subsidize healthy food.” –Latina mother, Denver, CO “There needs to be a legislative push period…These are policies, regulations that allow all this stuff to happen. And if the politicians are more on board what the masses want…we'll put in place policies that won't allow it.” – Latina mother, Denver, CO “The children deserve a future where healthy food is accessible to everybody.” – White Suburban Mother, Raleigh

3 Voters give high marks for the availability of food in America, but affordability, particularly for healthy food lags behind. 3 What grade would you give this? (A-F Scale, A=Excellent, F=Failure) 77 45 62 38 Total A+B

4 Voters across party lines rate the affordability of food/healthy food significantly lower than availability. 4 What grade would you give this? (A-F Scale, A=Excellent, F=Failure) % Rating A or BAll Party ID DIR Availability of food in America77757383 Affordability of food in America45 4346 Availability of healthy food in America62546572 Affordability of healthy food in America39354145

5 Voters express the strongest concerns around the impacts of food to children and health. 5 Does this raise very serious concerns, somewhat serious concerns, a little concern, or no concerns at all? % Very Serious DIR 858373 80 60 756760

6 Voters also express strong concern around the influence of money in politics. 6 Does this raise very serious concerns, somewhat serious concerns, a little concern, or no concerns at all? % Very Serious DIR 585545 486044 614834 58 30

7 Voters favor limiting subsidies to the largest farm businesses and overwhelmingly favor incentives to encourage sustainable farming practices that protect the environment. 7 Do you favor or oppose limits on government subsidies to the largest farm businesses? Do you favor or oppose government incentives to encourage sustainable farming practices that protect the environment? Party ID DIR Total Favor495350 Total Oppose34 40 Party ID DIR Total Favor857762 Total Oppose81332

8 Messaging focused on re-setting the goals of our food system – from profit to health – finds overwhelming agreement. 8 How convincing do you find this statement? Our current food policy isn’t focused on our health, it is focused on money. We put profits before our health and continue subsidies that help keep junk food cheap and drive up chronic health problems, like obesity, diabetes, and even cancer. The goal of our food system should be to produce healthy, affordable food that is accessible for all Americans, that protects our health, our workers and our environment, provide humane treatment of animals, and that will protect our local farmers and keep them farming their land. We need policies that recognize that healthy food is a necessity, not a privilege.

9 All voters find this messaging convincing, particularly Latinos, women, younger voters, and Democrats. 9 How convincing do you find this statement?

10 Methodology 10 Lake Research Partners and Bellwether Research and Consulting conducted focus groups in August of 2015 with the following audiences. Participants were recruited to reflect a mix of partisanship and education levels. Lake Research Partners and Bellwether Research and Consulting designed and administered a national survey of 1000 registered likely 2016 voters conducted by telephone from September 16th through 24 th, with 35 percent reached by cell phone. The margin of error for survey is +/- 3.1% at the 95% confidence interval. CityDate Composition Des Moines, IAAugust 5 White married mothers White unmarried women Raleigh, NCAugust 11 White suburban mothers African American mothers Denver, COAugust 13 White suburban fathers Latina mothers

11 Celinda Lake clake@lakeresearch.com @celindalake Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com 202.776.9066


Download ppt "Celinda Lake April 6, 2016 Lake Research Partners Washington, DC | Berkeley, CA | New York, NY LakeResearch.com 202.776.9066 Voter Support for Food System."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google