1. Technology and the Wilshire Way: an analysis of the Texas STaR Chart survey results 2006-2009 Julia Wilson EDLD 5306 June, 2010

2. On the Agenda What is the STaR Chart? ▫ LRPT (Long Range Plan for Technology) ▫ STaR Chart domains A look at Wilshire’s data ▫ Comparison of campus data to district data 2008/09 ▫ What’s working ▫ What are our challenges? Next steps

3. Each year, Wilshire teachers, along with teachers in public schools across the state, are asked to complete the STaR survey, which measures technology preparedness in our school and our district. (TEA, 2006)

4. The STaR Chart data is intended to answer two main questions: 1.Are teachers and schools working toward the goal of the LRPT? Long Range Plan for Technology 2006-2010Long Range Plan for Technology 2006-2010 2. Are students working toward mastery of tech literacy objectives in the TEKS? Technology TEKSTechnology TEKS

5. The STaR Chart Domains Teaching and Learning Educator Preparation and Development Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support Infrastructure for Technology Source: Texas Education Agency, 2006

6. STaR Chart data has been collected since the 2006-2007 school year Data is disaggregated at the campus, district and state levels Classifications are assigned for each of the domains: Early Tech (6-8) Developing Tech (9-14) Advanced Tech (15-20) Target Tech (21-24)

7. How we stack up: STaR Chart Comparison 2008-09

8. STaR Chart Analysis: Wilshire Elementary School; 2006-2009 Summary AreaKey Area Totals Key Area STaR Classifications Trends Teaching & Learning 2008-09: 11 2007-08: 12 2006-07: 12 2008-09: Developing 2007-08: Developing 2006-07: Developing Static, with slight decrease from year 2 to year 3; no change in classification (midrange) Educator Preparation & Development 2008-09: 10 2007-08: 10 2006-07: 8 2008-09: Developing 2007-08: Developing 2006-07: Early Slight growth in year 1, change in classification; then static (low range) Leadership, Administration, & Instructional Support 2008-09: 14 2007-08: 13 2006-07: 11 2008-09: Developing 2007-08: Developing 2006-07: Developing Slight growth; no change in classification over three years; no change in classification (mid- to high range) Infrastructure for Technology 2008-09: 15 2007-08: 15 2006-07: 16 2008-09: Advanced 2007-08: Advanced 2006-07: Advanced Slight decrease in year one, then static; no change in classification (low range) What does this mean for Wilshire?

9. We have the tools...

10. According to the data from 2006 to 2009, our campus shows the greatest strength in infrastructure for technology: 4 computers per classroom over 75 computers in our two labs and the library. document cameras, video recorders, digital cameras, poster makers, scanners, and SmartBoards excellent connectivity a wide variety of software for use (Office 2007, Photostory, SMART Technologies)

11. Where we fall short: Educator Preparation 2006-07: High Early Tech (8) 2007-08: Low Developing Tech (10) 2008-09: No Change Developing – “Use of technology is for administrative tasks and classroom management. There is use of online resources.” Source: TEA (2006). Texas STaR chart. Instructional Materials and Educational Technology Division Where we fall short: Teaching and Learning: 2006-07: Mid Developing (12) 2007-08: No Change 2008-09: -1 Developing – “Instruction is teacher-directed... students use technology to access electronic information and develop communication and presentation projects. There is minimal use of technology in foundation TEKS.”

12. How do we make technology a part of student-centered learning?

13. Professional Development Collaborate Continuous Improvement We use our best practices, and remember that we are learners as well as teachers.

14. “We all know that life will be very different by 2100. Will school?” -- Marc Prensky (2008). Adopt and adapt: shaping tech for the classroom. Edutopia: The George Lucas Educational Foundation