1. Annotated Bibliography CLN4U

2. General Information Definition – An annotated bibliography is a list of sources Each entry consists of two parts: – a. citation gives the exact information – b. annotation is a brief paragraph

3. While a bibliography provides readers with the basic details of a source (i.e. author, title, publication date), an annotated bibliography adds a summary, or annotation, below each source The summary includes phrases about the work and provides enough information so readers will understand the source’s purpose, context and value within the paper.

4. The Function of an Annotated Bibliography Describe the source content, purpose or central theme Note the relevance of the information and the authority or background of the author Indicate the general audience Explain anything that makes this source unique Make readers aware of any weakness or bias

5. Style and Stance Writing style – The annotation is normally written in formal paragraph style using complete sentences. Stance – The annotation can take any of the following stances Descriptive - is a summary of the source Evaluative – determines the usefulness of the source Applicable – explains why the source is relevant to your essay Combination – is a combination of the three

6. Example Adams, Scott. Dilbert and the Way of the Weasel. New York: Harper, 2002. Print. Adams’s “Dilbert” cartoons are known for satirizing everyday workplace issues. The cartoon on page 106 illustrates how rampant Internet use in the workplace has become and suggests that both employers and employees are well aware of the practice. The cartoon points out the difficulty employers face in trying to restrict employee Internet use.

7. Selecting your Sources

8. Sources Locate the sources you intend to use – Make sure each source follows specific guidelines established in class – do not include: Encyclopaedia sources Textbook sources, unless it is a direct quote from a credible author (see below) Website sources that I have not approved any internet source that includes an author whose credibility cannot be verified (see below)

9. Sources (cont) evaluate each source based on the following process: – Physical Evaluation 1. the author by examining his/her credentials 2. the source by examining its date of publication 3. the source by determining if you are using a later edition 4. the source by reviewing its publisher or journal title

10. Sources (cont) Content Evaluation – 1. If the source is a book review preface, foreword, introduction Look over the table of contents – If the source is a periodical Review summary and bibliography – 2. Read chapters or articles specifically pertaining to your topic – 3. Determine type of audience the work addresses – 4. Is the work organized effectively – 5. Determine if reviews of source are available