1. Championing Young People’s Learning London Councils: YPES Meeting – 16-19 Allocations Update Championing Young People’s Learning Mike Pettifer YPLA

2. Key changes since January Statement All allocations went out by the end of March Top 20 th percentile SLN/Learner ratio not applied Limited increase of funding per learner to 10% Foundation Learning – min. SLN of 0.7 Disadvantage funding applied after transitional protection Bursary Fund Consultation concluded 20 th May 2011

3. London Aerial View £s 10/11 allocation £951m 11/12 allocation £945m Places 09/10 planned 178,616 10/11 planned 182,913 11/12 planned 182,700

4. FE places

5. Sixth Form Places in London

6. Changing Market Share in London

7. Championing Young People’s Learning The Pace of Conversion in London 2010/11

8. The Financial Picture

9. Transitional Protection 2011-12

14. Championing Young People’s Learning Distribution of Additional £150m

15. Summary Budget for 11/12 (-£6m = -0.63%) Places for 11/12 (-213 = -0.12%) Disadvantage funding (ALS +20% nat. av. & uplift +42%) Increasing academy numbers Bursary to be distributed

16. www.londoncouncils.gov.uk 16-19 Allocations Implications for London Yolande Burgess, Strategy Director

17. Policy changes Entitlement (enrichment activities) cut by 84 funded hours: average 13% reduction in funding per learner All institutions on the same national rate of £2,920: downward convergence for schools Additional £150m for disadvantage: 16% of pot to London cushioned the blow And the other reductions 25% reduction in Teachers Pay Grant Removal of additional payments for teachers’ pensions

18. Policy changes and funding Allocations –£6million reduction Teachers Pay Grant –£3million reduction Pensions –£9.9million loss

19. Effect of the changes Proportion of institutions receiving transitional protection: –92% of schools –90% of academies –84% of colleges (general and sixth form) Significant numbers of institutions protected in 2011/12 – future?

20. Protection ends 2014/15 Incrementally reducing transitional protection Funding per learner

21. Implications for learners Reduction of 3% per learner for most institutions Reduced curriculum opportunities due to cut in enrichment funding Larger groups to manage costs savings Reduced student contact time Reduction in student support - impact of loss of Education Maintenance Allowance Potential impact on achievement

22. Known's and unknowns Academy converters: More schools becoming academies – the market place changes All change in schools: Curriculum, targets, inspections, governance, responsibilities Wolf and the curriculum: English and maths, Apprenticeships, work experience, infrastructure Wolf and funding: A move from per qualification funding to per pupil funding

23. Known's and unknowns Pressure on adult funding: College infrastructure vulnerable – risk averse in a time when we need creativity Post-16 funding formula review: The policy focus next year could shift funding across regions and between types of institutions National funding formula for schools: The appetite for a single formula 4 to19? Simplification: Push for further simplification – risk is that simplicity ends up as simplistic