1. CIRTL Network Meeting Fall 2015 Boston, MA Bubble-Propelled Drugs

2. BOTTOM LINE – Preparing a significant number of future faculty to have dynamic and effective faculty careers that integrate research, teaching and learning based on the three CIRTL pillars. BOTTOM LINE - Institutionalized local CIRTL programs that continue to accomplish above. BOTTOM LINE – Understand the impact of cross-Network activities on future faculty preparation TARGET GOAL - Expansion of the CIRTL Network to increase above. What Represents Success for our CIRTL Network? (from 2009 meeting)

3. (Potential) Expansion

4. Directions for improvement as we move toward the expanded CIRTL Network “Loose Ends”

5. Institutionalization

6. Governance

7. CIRTL Network Organizational Structure Operations Group Cross-Network Curriculum Operations Group Alumni Learning Community Operations Group Research and Evaluation Operations Group Cross-Network LC Cross-Network LC Coordinator Institutional Leaders Director Administrative Director (“CIRTL Central”) Board of Advisors (graduate deans) National Advisory Board Working Group CIRTL Forums and ad hoc Working Group Graduate Research Fellows Working Group Connections to PUIs Working Group Professional Societies Leadership Committee Local Learning Communities Operations Group IT Development and Support Working Group CIRTL MOOC

8. Governance Explicit lines of authority and responsibility. Explicit process for decision making. Transparency All voices heard Explicit process for populating leadership roles. Explicit accountability.

9. Mutual Calibration of Achievement Levels 1400 700 100 Associates Practitioners Scholars Outcome Level Annual Goal

10. Achievement Levels

11. Closing thought on roles and responsibilities Trees and Forest – Some Meta-Thoughts 1)The Learning Outcomes describe what a CIRTL participant at a particular level is able to do. 2) Each institution has the freedom and the responsibility to decide how to prepare their CIRTL participants to do these outcomes. 3)Each university has the freedom and the responsibility to judge whether a participant has achieved a given level of capablity. (from Spring 2014)

12. Research and Evaluation Establish our Outcomes Tell the CIRTL Story Tremendous Possibilities Very Underfunded Dissertations Network Analyses Network Analyses Network Development Network Development Longitudinal Study

13. Institutionalization Achievement Levels Governance Research and Evaluation From Craig – increasing local participation “Loose Ends”

14. The CIRTL mission is to enhance excellence in undergraduate education through the development of a national faculty committed to implementing and advancing effective teaching practices for diverse learners as part of successful and varied professional careers. CIRTL Mission

15. Network Production by Institution 400 Practitioners and Scholars 2000 Associates GLHEC Goals are to Double Next Year

16. We Are Doing Good Work !

17. And Soon Will Be Doing More!

18. What CIRTL Is About Ain Shams Univ., Cairo University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign UW - Madison Ball State University Purdue University Tufts University Lawrence University North Carolina State University University of Dubuque College of Idaho Madison Area Technical College Augustana College Pacific University of Oregon Pacific Northwest National Laboratory University of Maryland Eastern Shore Grand Valley State University University of Louisville University of Wisconsin - Rock County The Ohio State University

19. Meeting Agenda This morning Catching up with each other, sharing successes Working together to calibrate Practitioner achievement This afternoon Overarching group discussion of next steps with CNLC Needs/Resource Analysis - process experiment Tomorrow Closure on Needs/Resource Analysis Working groups on onboarding plans for next spring Looking ahead on data agreement and CNC roll out