2.  Project Recap  Lessons Learned (DRCOG)  Results from the Survey  Discussion of Final Thoughts for 2012  Discussion of the Upcoming 2014 Project  Lessons Learned (Kucera) (11:30 to 12:00)

3.  Who’s Involved?  50 Partners  8 DRCOG Member Counties (only Arapahoe abstains)  27 DRCOG Member Cities  15 Regional Partners (e.g. RTD, CDOT, USGS, United Power)  What’s the extent?  7,000 square miles

4.  Image Quality = High  Flights = On time, good weather, “to spec”  Cost = Low compared to previous years  Participation = On the high end  WMS = Well-received “stop gap” solution (Final on 12/20)  Deliverables = 76% by last deliverable date (1/15)

5.  80% of partners use it frequently

6.  Clarifications in the Statement of Work:  Better explanation of where vendors should pay close attention for tall buildings (building lean).  Draw more attention to the delivery/distribution responsibilities of both vendors.  Simplify the deliverables.  Process Improvements:  Obtain Imagery and DAT approval at the SAME board meeting in December/January. February is a little late.  Reevaluate license agreement language to include WMS.

7.  34% response rate  Overall experience =  59% Very Good; 41% Good  DRCOG project management =  76% Very Good; 24% Good  Cost =  94% Reasonable; 6% Somewhat high

8.  Image Quality=  76% Very Good, 18% Good, 6% Fair  Communication=  71% Very Good, 29% Good  Delivery Times=  41% Very Good, 41% Good, 12% Fair, 6% Poor

9.  Interest in Add-ons (ranked): 1. Permanent WMS 2. LIDAR Acquisition 3. Planimetric Features 4. Web Coverage Service 5. Other: Impervious Service

12.  SP CO Central, HARN (US Survey Feet) 8  SP CO Central, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) 24  SP CO North, HARN (US Survey Feet) 10  SP CO North, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) 5  UTM Z13 North, NAD 83 (Meters) 3  Could we standardize?  Can you project on-the-fly with ArcMap?

13.  Compressed GeoTIFF6  Uncompressed GeoTIFF21  JPG200027  MrSID 3 band15  MrSID 4 band4  Can we standardize?  Are all these formats necessary?  Does a permanent WMS or WCS change the need for certain formats?

14.  If we had a permanent WCS, would you consider not ordering imagery for the entire project area?

16.  How much would it cost?  What are our options?  What could we get from it?  Can you post-process by yourself?

17.  August 28 th  Gather requirements for DRAPP 2014  Form the RFP review and vendor interview subcommittee