Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX Robert Nelson.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX Robert Nelson."— Presentation transcript:

1 Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX lisa.stevenson@hanscom.af.mil Robert Nelson MCR, LLC rnelson@mcri.com

2 Overview Background Enterprise Approach Estimate Results Lessons Learned Cost Estimate Team Members – Linda BlackwellOasis – Janet WentworthUSAF – Bob NelsonMCR 2

3 Background Problem Statement Air Force must meet Mode S requirements – 2005 Eurocontrol mandate for Mode S 46 aircraft types 5,000 aircraft – 2008 US military requirement for Mode 5 3

4 Background Mode S Secondary Surveillance Radar –Airborne beacon that sends out signals identifying flight number, location, attitude, heading, etc. –Used by air traffic control – includes ground radars –Signal is used by the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System –Mandated for use by all aircraft operating in Europe starting in 2005 4

5 Background Mode S con’t 30 minute timeline during day EUROCONTROL Mandates Elementary Surveillance (ELS) by March 2005 Enhanced Surveillance (EHS) by March 2007 91 Civil Interrogators 167 Military Interrogators Charts per Eurocontrol 5

6 Background Eurocontrol Mandate Elementary Surveillance (ELS) 2005 deadline – Flight Number – Selective Interrogation Codes Enhanced Surveillance (EHS) 2007 deadline – Selected Altitude (by autopilot) – Airspeed – Magnetic Heading – Roll Angle – Track Angle/Angle Rate Chart per Eurocontrol 6

7 Background Mode S/5 Equipment Examples of Mode S/5 Aircraft Equipment: –Transponders (Example Shown) –Interrogators (MS/5) –Crypto appliqués (M5) –Control panels (Example Shown) APX-119 APX-118 w/Control Panel 7

8 Background Platforms CombatMobilitySpecial Ops Based in or potentially rotated to Europe Fly frequently in Europe Fly seldom or never in Europe or still in development A-10 F-15 F-16 HH-60G RC-135 MC-130H/P MH-053M/J B-1 B-2 B-52 E-3 E-4 E-8 EC-130H F-117 RQ-4 U-2 C-5 C-17 C-32 C-40 C-130J C-130 other KC-10 VC-25 AC-130H/U EC-130E/J HC-130H/N/P MC-130E CV-22 F-22 F-35 RQ-1 X-45 (UCAV) YAL-1 (ABL) C-12 C-22 C-38 C-141 UH-01N C-9 C-20 C-21 C-37 C-130E KC-135 Group 8

9 Background Enterprise Approach 9 Establish a multiple office/capability team to accomplish this very complex cost estimate tasking Extend beyond individual expertise and experience to − Develop and apply a common methodology − Decrease enterprise risk

10 Background Enterprise Partners Electronics Systems Center –Global Air Technical Expertise – Mode S Estimate Review and Coordination –Strategic Reconnaissance / Computer Resources Support Group Technical Expertise – Mode 5 Aeronautical Systems Center –Aging Aircraft Aircraft Integration Expertise –SPO & Financial Management Estimate Review and Coordination Air Mobility Command/ Air Combat Command / Air Staff –Integration Roadmap Coordination 10

11 Enterprise Approach The Overall Process Programmatic Requirements Mode S/5 Technical Requirements Acquisition GR&A CES Project Offices Develop Estimate Technical & Cost Consistency Review Refine Estimate Briefing Preparation Brief Acquisition Authority Brief Decision Makers 11

12 Estimate Process Technical Consistency Technical solutions to required upgrade Specifications – for transponder Integration level (Elementary / Enhanced) Upgrade path definition 12

13 Estimate Process Consistency Common Cost Element Structure –Development Hardware (aircraft kit) Software (modify flight S/W) Test, Systems Engineering Operational Testing –Production Procurement (Mode S and A/C kits) Installation (Mode S and A/C kits) Test, Systems Engineering 13

14 Estimate Process Consistency con’t Common Ground Rules & Assumptions –Schedule/priority to meet mandate –Estimate confidence –Economic – constant year, inflation factors 14

15 Estimate Process Consistency con’t Mode S transponder is an iGATM catalog item Knowledge of analogous integrations Various approached could be used to estimate aircraft changes, software modification and in- particular by the newer aircraft (F-22, F-35) Reviewed by ASC/ESC cost estimators who understood the technical requirements 15

16 Estimate Process Consistency con’t Aircraft specific integration requirements defined by each SPO based on: –Mode S/5 technical specifications –Mode 5 crypto development schedule –Requirements to integrate to EHS 16

17 Estimate Process Coordination Constant interface and contact required among Enterprise participants −Provided by ASC to ensure that each SPO acted in a timely manner Multiple stakeholders have multiple priorities Warfighter capability has a higher priority 17

18 Estimate Results Cost Breakdown Total Mode S/5 Mode S ELS Un-funded Mode S EHS/5 Un-funded Un-funded Mode S/5Funded Mode S Mode S ELS Un-funded Mode S EHS/5 Un-funded EHS M5 18

19 Estimate Results Fielding Plan Sand-Chart Aircraft Qty 19

20 Estimate Results The Final Briefing Estimate briefed to Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition in Nov 2003 –Focus on Mode S Integration –Time-phased costs –Fielding plan Briefing accepted –Offices directed to work the immediate costs and to budget requests for FY-06 and beyond 20

21 Lessons Learned Insure consistent understanding of GR&A Insure understanding of technical approach Allow estimator to define methodology. Review for consistency and compliance Keep to the schedule 21


Download ppt "Enterprise Approach Used In Cost Estimating Presented by SCEA 2004 National Conference Lisa Stevenson ESC/GAX Robert Nelson."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google