Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBenedict Reed Modified over 8 years ago
2
1 HEADWORKS ANALYSIS WORKSHOP
3
2 Objectives of Pretreatment Program Objectives of Pretreatment Program Purpose of Headworks Analysis Purpose of Headworks Analysis Data Needed For Headworks Analysis Data Needed For Headworks Analysis Steps For Headworks Analysis Steps For Headworks Analysis Documents Needed to Submit Headworks Analysis Documents Needed to Submit Headworks Analysis Workshop Overview
4
3 Protect the Waters of the State (the stream) Protect the POTW’s Microorganisms & WWTP Protect the Land/Groundwater (Sludge) Protect Workers’ Health and Safety Objectives of Pretreatment Program: 40 CFR 403.2 Model SUO, Section 1.1
5
4 Land Application Standards WWTP Commercial SIUs Aeration Basin Clarifier Disinfection Digester NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Influent Typicalville Residential
6
5 40 CFR 403: General Pretreatment Regulations 40 CFR 403.2: Objectives of the General Pretreatment Regulations are to prevent pass through, prevent interference, and improve opportunities to recycle and reclaim sludge. 40 CFR 403.5(c): Each POTW shall develop and continue to develop and enforce local limits. 40 CFR 403.5(c)(4): Local limits can include Best Management Practices (BMPs). 40 CFR 403.5(d): Local limits shall be considered pretreatment standards for purposes of CWA.
7
6 Purpose of Headworks Analysis Helps POTW meet objectives of 40 CFR 403, including 403.2 and 403.5 Helps POTW meet objectives of 40 CFR 403, including 403.2 and 403.5 Summarizes operating conditions at POTW Summarizes operating conditions at POTW Summarizes POTW’s ability to remove Pollutants of Concern (POCs) Summarizes POTW’s ability to remove Pollutants of Concern (POCs) Calculates: Calculates: Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading Develops site-specific local limits Develops site-specific local limits
8
7 Categorical Standards VS. Local Limits Categorical standards are developed by EPA Local limits are developed by POTW Categorical standards are uniform Local limits are site- specific Categorical limits are “technology” based – based on SIU treatment technology Local Limits are “technically” based – based on local environmental protection factors
9
8 Data Needed For HWA Determine HWA Data Time Period Determine HWA Data Time Period DMR & Long/Short Term Monitoring Data DMR & Long/Short Term Monitoring Data POTW Design Data for Conventional Pollutants POTW Design Data for Conventional Pollutants SIUs Load To POTW SIUs Load To POTW Uncontrolled Load To POTW Uncontrolled Load To POTW Sludge Data Sludge Data
10
9 Define HWA Time Period Based on number of influent and effluent data sets for the least frequently sampled Pollutant of Concern (POC) Division approved LTMP/STMP defines: Proper sampling locations Proper sampling locations Proper pollutants of concern Proper pollutants of concern Correct detection levels Correct detection levels Frequencies Frequencies
11
10 Full Programs HWA Time Period: Long Term Monitoring Plan To provide adequate data set for HWA: Need at least 12 sets of influent and effluent data for least sampled POC - Need at least 12 sets of influent and effluent data for least sampled POC - Quarterly sampling data for 3 years Quarterly sampling data for 3 yearsOR Monthly sampling data for 1 year Monthly sampling data for 1 year Once define period, use all available data for entire 1 or 3 years, including DMR data Once define period, use all available data for entire 1 or 3 years, including DMR data
12
11 Modified Programs HWA Time Period: Short Term Monitoring Plan To provide adequate data set for HWA: Need at least 4 sets of influent and effluent data for least sampled POC Need at least 4 sets of influent and effluent data for least sampled POC Quarterly sampling data for 1 year Quarterly sampling data for 1 year To cover all seasons To cover all seasons Once define period, use all available data for entire 1 year, including DMR data Once define period, use all available data for entire 1 year, including DMR data
13
12 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
14
13 Steps For Headworks Analysis Gather POTW General NPDES Information Collect POTW Design Information Calculate Plant Removal Rates Calculate Allowable Pass Through Load Calculate Allowable Biological Inhibition Load Calculate Allowable Load Using Sludge Criteria Develop Maximum Allowable Headworks Load Calculate SIUs Load to POTW Evaluate Uncontrolled Load to POTW Determine Maximum Allowable Industrial Load Allocate SIU Local Limits
15
14 Collect Data Calculate RR Calculate Sludge AHL Calculate Inhibition AHL Calculate Pass-Thru AHL Calculate Non-SIU Load Develop MAHL Determine MAIL Reduce Limits Use HASL Review UNC Allocate SIU Limits Over Allocation Done Calculate SIU Load Yes No Headworks Analysis: Flow Diagram
16
15 Review HWA spreadsheet: Info from NPDES Permit In General Info Section of HWA Tab 3-A, page 2 In General Info Section of HWA Tab 3-A, page 2 NPDES Permit Number – Cell C4 NPDES Permit Number – Cell C4 Tab 3-B, page 11 Tab 3-B, page 11 NPDES Permitted Flow - Cell C7 NPDES Permitted Flow - Cell C7 Tab 3-B, page 13 Tab 3-B, page 13 Stream Classification – Cell C11 Stream Classification – Cell C11 Tab 3-B, page 12 Tab 3-B, page 12
17
16 Tab 3-B, page 11 Tab 3-B, page 11
18
17 Tab 3-B, page 12 Tab 3-B, page 12
19
18
20
19 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
21
20 Review HWA spreadsheet: Info from Program Info Sheet Tab 3A Page 2 Tab 3A Page 2 7Q10 – in mgd – Cell C10 7Q10 – in mgd – Cell C10 Tab 3-B, page 15 Tab 3-B, page 15 Can also find in NPDES fact sheet or from NPDES unit, but will be in cubic feet per second --- must convert to mgd. cfs * 0.646 = mgd Can also find in NPDES fact sheet or from NPDES unit, but will be in cubic feet per second --- must convert to mgd. cfs * 0.646 = mgd Verify Program Info sheet has correct NPDES Permit Number, Permitted Flow, and Stream Classification Verify Program Info sheet has correct NPDES Permit Number, Permitted Flow, and Stream Classification
22
21 Tab 3-B, page 15 Tab 3-B, page 15
23
22 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
24
POTW Removal Rates
25
24 What Do I Need To Calculate Removal Rates? All DMR and LTMP/STMP data for HWA time period Removal Rate Equation Literature Removal Rates
26
25 Plant Removal Rates Calculation Removal Rate equation: Using unpaired sampling data Mean Removal Rate, RR = ((C I - C E )/ C I ) * 100 RR = Removal Rate, % C I = Average Influent Concentration, mg/l C E = Average Effluent Concentration, mg/l Methodologies: Unpaired sampling (Division recommends) Paired sampling Decile approach
27
26 Plant Removal Rates Calculation Use DMR data - Tab 3-B, pages 16 and 17 To calculate average POTW flow To calculate average influent and effluent of BOD, TSS, and any other available pollutants If have Below Detection Level (BDL) data… and that BDL was treated as zero when calculating DMR Monthly Ave…. must recalculate DMR Monthly Average using ½ detection level
28
27 Plant Removal Rates Calculation Tab 3-B, pages 16 and 18 Use LTMP/STMP data for rest of metals and other POCs: Tab 3-B, pages 16 and 18 Non-NPDES limits page POCs Influent If Below Detection Level (BDL) data, enter “<“ sign in “<“ column, and detection level in other cell
29
28 Tab 3-B, page 16
30
29 Tab 3-B, page 16
31
30 Tab 3-B, page 19
32
31 Tab 3-B, page 16
33
32 Tab 3-B, page 23
34
33 Tab 3-B, page 17
35
34 Tab 3-B, page 17
36
35 Tab 3-B, page 19
37
36 Tab 3-B, page 17
38
37 Tab 3-B, page 17
39
38 Tab 3-B, page 23
40
39 Tab 3-B, page 18
41
40 Tab 3-B, page 23
42
41 Removal Rate Calculations Enter data for every month and every LTMP/STMP sample for the whole HWA Data Time Period If update spreadsheet as receive LTMP/STMP results each quarter: less typing at HWA time verify met LTMP/STMP Detection Levels (DLs)… …and get sample re-analyzed before lab tosses sample can review trends in data, outliers, etc.
43
42 Tab 3-B, page 23-24
44
43 Tab 3-B, page 24
45
44 When Do I Use Literature RRs? More than 50% of data collected is below detection level Small or a misrepresentative data set Any Questions? Call PERCS or Consult The Comprehensive Guidance for Pretreatment Programs in North Carolina, Chapter 5, Section 5-D, page 1
46
45 Tab 1, yellow page Cyanide Literature Removal Rate 69%
47
46 Tab 3-B, page 24
48
47 Review HWA spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2 Average POTW Flow in cell C8 Average POTW Flow in cell C8 Removal Rates in column C Removal Rates in column C Removal Rate Sources in column D Removal Rate Sources in column D
49
48 Tab 3-A, page 2
50
49 Tab 3-A, page 2
51
50 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
52
51 Removal Rate Guidance in Tab 1 of your Manual Removal Rate Guidance in Tab 1 of your Manual Unit Conversion Guidance in Tab 1 of your Manual Unit Conversion Guidance in Tab 1 of your Manual
53
52 Land Application Standards WWTP Commercial SIUs Aeration Basin Clarifier Disinfection Digester NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Influent Typicalville Residential
54
53 Three Limiting Criteria for Developing Maximum Allowable Headworks Load 1. 1. Pass Through a. NPDES Limit b. NC-Water Quality Standard c. Design 2. Biological Processes Inhibition a. Activated Sludge/Nitrification Inhibition b. Anaerobic Digester Inhibition 3. Sludge Quality - 503 Regulations a. Land Application b. Incinerator C. Landfill
55
54 Pass Through Criteria NPDES Limit NC-Water Quality Standard
56
Limiting Criteria Pass Through Aeration Basin Sludge Chlorine/ UV Disinfect Aeration Basin Clarifier Bar Screen Grit Removal Filter Digester 1a River Styx 1b 1c
57
56 What Do I Need To Calculate Pass Through Allowable Headworks Load (AHL)? Current NPDES Permit – Tab 3-B, pages 11-14 Which parameters are limited? New NPDES limits expected/drafted? NC-Water Quality Standards - Tab 1 - yellow All parameters not limited in your NPDES Receiving Stream Classification Pass Through Equation Removal Rates – Tab 3-B, pages 19-28 Average POTW Flow (NOT Permitted flow)
58
57 AHL: Pass Through Criteria Based on NPDES Limit Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Passthrough/NPDES = NPDES POTW Average (8.34) Limit, mg/l Flow, mgd (1 - POTW RR, as decimal)
59
Simple Pass Through Example based on NPDES Permit Limit NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Land Application Standards WWTP SIU’s Residential Commercial 2 mg/l Influent 50% RR NPDES Permit Limit= 1 mg/l The other “1 mg/l” went into the sludge
60
Another Simple Pass Through Example based on NPDES Permit Limit NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Land Application Standards WWTP SIU’s Residential Commercial 4 mg/l Influent 75% RR The other “3 mg/l” went into the sludge NPDES Permit Limit= 1 mg/l
61
60
62
61
63
62 AHL: Pass Through Criteria Based on Typicalville’s Mercury NPDES Limit Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Passthrough/NPDES = (8.34) ( 0.000224 ) ( 7.168 ) = (1 – 0.60) 0.03348 lbs/day mercury allowed at influent and not violate NPDES
64
Pass Through for Mercury - based on Typicalville’s NPDES Permit Limit NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Land Application Standards WWTP SIU’s Residential Commercial 0.00056 mg/l (560 ng/l) (0.03348 #’s/day) Influent 7.168 MGD 60% RR NPDES Permit Limit= 0.000224 mg/l (224 ng/l)
65
64 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 2 NPDES Limits in column B If have more than one limit for same parameter, enter most stringent. Consider entering potential new NPDES limits? Watch Units – 50 ug/l limit = 0.05 mg/l 224 ng/l limit = 0.000224 mg/l Pass through NPDES AHLs calculated in Column E
66
65 Tab 3-A, page 2
67
66 AHL: Pass Through Criteria Based on Water Quality Standard Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Pass Through/WQS = NC Water Quality POTW Receiving Standard, Average + Stream (8.34) mg/l Flow, mgd 7Q10, mgd (1 - POTW RR, as decimal)
68
67 Tab 1, yellow page Nickel has two Standards! Which do I use? 0.088 mg/l Class C-Aquatic Life? 0.025 mg/l Class WS-Water Supply?
69
68 Which Stream Standard? Receiving Stream Classification Class C – Use “Aquatic Life” Class Water Supply (WS) and Trout – Use WS/Trout if available. Otherwise use Aquatic Life High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or any with a “+” or “Critical Area” - Contact PERCS
70
69 Which Stream Standard? Tab 3-B, page 12 - Typicalville is Class Water Supply IV Tab 3-A, page 2, cell C11 Tab 1 – HWA numbers Nickel – 25 ug/l (Class C = 88 ug/l) Arsenic – 10 ug/l (Class C = 50 ug/l) Chlorides – 250 mg/l versus 230 mg/l Action Level for Class C Sulfates – 250 mg/l Tab 3A, page 2, “comment boxes” for cells F27-F38
71
70 AHL: Pass Through Criteria Based on Nickel Water Quality Standard Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) for Nickel based on Pass Through/WQS = (8.34)(0.025 mg/l)(7.168+239.02 mgd)= (1 – 0.42) 88.5 lbs/day nickel allowed at influent to not violate NC WQS for Water Supply
72
71 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 2 Stream Standards in column F If more than one Standard for same parameter – eval. rec. stream class. Do not enter standards where have NPDES Permit Limits Stream Standard Sources in column G If your POC is not on PERCS HWA Numbers sheet, contact PERCS Pass through Water Quality Stream Standard AHLs calculated in Column H
73
72 Tab 3-A, page 2
74
73 Action Level POCs Action Level Parameters in NC are: Copper, Silver, Zinc, Fe, and Chlorides Do not enter WQ Action Levels for Action Level Parameters, UNLESS The POTW is failing Toxicity and an Action Level Pollutant is the cause for failing. ….Remember, for Water Supply receiving streams, Chlorides is Water Quality Standard, so must enter in HWA if Chlorides is POC for your POTW
75
74 Tab 3-A, page 2
76
75 What If 7Q10 Flow = Zero? Typicalville has huge river– 7Q10 = 239.02 MGD Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) for Nickel based on Pass Through/WQS AHL = (8.34)(0.025)(7.168 + 239.02) (1 – 0.42) (1 – 0.42) AHL = 88.5003 lbs./day What if your 7Q10 were Zero? AHL = (8.34)(0.025)(7.168 + 0) (1 – 0.42) (1 – 0.42) AHL = 2.5678 lbs./day
77
76 Tab 3-A, page 2
78
77 Design
79
78 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants The engineers who designed your POTW designed it to be able to treat a specific target or “design” influent value for selected parameters and still meet your NPDES limit. Most/all POTWs have Design for BOD+TSS Some/many have Design for NH3 Some/fewer have Design for Total Phosphorus (TP), and maybe even Total Nitrogen (TN)
80
79 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants Where are my Design values? O&M Manual Plans and Specs Engineer’s Calculations Tab 3-B, page 29 What about: Upgrades Expansions New design parameters AHL = AHL Design = (8.34)(Design Influent, mg/l) (Design flow, MGD) Use average Design values, not max or peak
81
80 Tab 3-B, page 29 Tab 3-B, page 29
82
81 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 2 Design Criteria in cells G17 – G21 If have more than one Design Criteria for same parameter, enter most stringent If your Design POC is not in HWA spreadsheet, contact PERCS Design AHLs calculated in Column I
83
82 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
84
83 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants All NC POTWs must enter Design Criteria in HWA for all parameters with Design Criteria Then evaluate Design Load and compare to the NPDES Load, in both mg/l and lbs/day NPDES < Design, use NPDES as MAHL May be able to use Design if under-loaded Contact PERCS to discuss Design < NPDES, use Design as MAHL Remember that’s all MAHL you will ever have Not happy? - More in a minute To select Design as MAHL, put X in cells J17–J21 Tab 3-A, page 2
85
84 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
86
85 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants Sometimes a WWTP can actually treat wastewater better than the design criteria set by the engineer. MAHL > Design Criteria may be approved with: Design Multiplier of 1.5 Historic Data => Design Load? NC Professional Engineer provides new Stamped Design Calculations Other Compelling Argument?
87
86 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants Specific guidance on web-site NOW! And in Tab 1 of your Manual Feb 2007, Dec 2007, Dec 2008 Applies to BOD, TSS, NH3, and Phosphorus Recommend apply to Total Nitrogen
88
87 AHL: Conventional/Design Pollutants - Typicalville Typicalville used the Design Multiplier of 1.5 See discussion in HWA Narrative Tab 3-A, page 1C
89
88 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
90
89 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
91
90
92
Biological Processes Inhibition Aeration Basin
93
Limiting Criteria Biological Process Inhibition Aeration Basin Sludge Chlorine/ UV Disinfect Aeration Basin Clarifier Bar Screen Grit Removal Filter Digester 2a and 2b River Styx 2c
94
93 What Do I Need To Calculate Biological Inhibition Load? Basic understanding of WWTP microorganisms Wastewater Biological Treatment Units Activated Sludge, Aeration Basin, etc. Trickling Filter Carbonaceous vs. Nitrogenous/Nitrification Sludge Biological Treatment Units Only if have Anaerobic Digester Inhibition Formula Literature Inhibition Criteria LTMP/STMP data from basins (+anaerobic digesters)
95
94 AHL: Inhibition Criteria Based on Activated Sludge/Nitrification Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Secondary Treatment Inhibition = Secondary Inhibition POTW Average (8.34) Criteria, mg/l Flow, mgd (1 - Primary RR, as decimal) No primary Clarifiers? - just use 0
96
Water Quality Standards Inhibition Loading for Nickel based on Nitrification Inhibition NPDES Permit Limits WWTP SIU’s Residential Commercial 0.25 mg/l (14.9453 #/ day) Influent 7.168 MGD Activated Sludge Land Application Standards
97
96 Tab 1, yellow page Nickel has two numbers! Which do I use? 1 mg/l Activated Sludge? 0.25 mg/l Nitrification?
98
97 Which Inhibition Values Do I Use? Activated Sludge Inhibition: All POTWs must evaluate for Activated Sludge Inhibition Nitrification Inhibition: POTWs who have Ammonia limit and/or Nitrogenous bacteria (We’ll get to anaerobic digesters later…)
99
98 Which Inhibition Values Do I Use? Nitrification Inhibition: NPDES permit limit for ammonia Tab 3-B, page 13 Nitrogenous bacteria Does LTMP data suggest WWTP nitrifies? Tab 3-B, page 20 Ask the ORC - Does POTW nitrify? Must use lower of Activated Sludge or Nitrification Inhibition Criteria
100
99
101
100 Tab 3-B, page 20 Tab 3-B, page 20
102
101 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 3 Enter chosen inhibition criteria in column D Source in Column E If your POC is not on PERCS HWA Numbers sheet, contact PERCS
103
102 Tab 3-A, page 3 Tab 3-A, page 3
104
103 No Literature Inhibition Criteria Load? If no literature Biological Inhibition criteria for a POC, do not have to develop site-specific inhibition criteria L/STMP - Do not have to sample for these POCs at the biological process locations such as aeration basin or influent to anaerobic digester or other inhibition related locations like primary clarifier effluent BOD, TSS, Mo, Se, some others
105
104 Site Specific vs. Literature Inhibition Criteria If LTMP data suggests POTW is acclimated to higher levels of site-specific concentration than traditional literature values, ask ORC: Was POTW upset during basin sampling? Were there NPDES or Toxicity violations? Were any effluent parameters (usually BOD, TSS NH 3 ) elevated above normal for no other apparent reason? Was there foaming? Was there fluctuations in the DO? Did the bugs die? If No, then the POTW may consider using basin data for site specific inhibition criteria.
106
Tab 3-B, page 30-31 Tab 3-B, page 30-31
107
106 Tab 1, yellow page
108
107
109
108 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 3 Replace chosen literature inhibition criteria in column D with chosen site-specific value. Source in Column E, and discuss in HWA Narrative
110
109 Tab 3-A, page 3 Tab 3-A, page 3
111
110 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
112
111 Get Credit for Primary Clarifier Removal? Quarterly LTMP/STMP sampling at primary clarifier effluent (PCE) Sample before any return flows Same detection levels as influent/effluent Only required for parameters with literature inhibition criteria Use with WWTP influent data to calculate primary removal rates BDL Data? – same as WWTP removal rates regarding use of literature removal rates No PCE sampling? No primary removal rates in HWA at all, even literature primary removal rates Newton Example HWA – Tab 4 – has primaries
113
112 AHL: Based on Anaerobic Digester Inhibition Conservative Pollutants AHL for Anaerobic Digester = (8.34)(An. Dig Inhib Crit, mg/l) (Flow to Dig, MGD) POTW Removal Rate, as Decimal Non-conservative Pollutants AHL for Anaerobic Digester = (Influent NH3 in lbs/day) * (An. Dig Inhib Crit, mg/l) (Avg. influent to sludge to An. Dig NH3, mg/l) AnaerobicDigester
114
113 Tab 1, yellow page
115
114 Review HWA Spreadsheet [On Tab 3-A, page 2, enter sludge to Digester Flow in cell C14] Tab 3-A, page 3 Literature inhibition criteria in column G Source in Column H Ammonia is Special… Non-conservative – not all NH3 “removed” by WWTP ends up in digester…. is converted to NO2/NO3 Average influent NH3 in cell G49 Average Influent to Sludge to Digester NH3 in cell G50
116
115 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
117
116 Tab 3-A, page 3 Tab 3-A, page 3
118
Sludge Criteria – 503 Regulations
119
HWA Limiting Criteria Sludge 503 Regulations Aeration Basin Sludge Chlorine/ UV Disinfect Aeration Basin Clarifier Bar Screen Grit Removal Filter Digester 3a 3b River Styx
120
119 Tab 3-C Copy of selected pages of current Sludge Permit Copy of selected pages of current Annual Sludge Report Site Life Sludge Formulas What Do I Need To Calculate Sludge Load?
121
120 Land Application/Compost: Limits: Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc Incineration: Limits: Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel Municipal Solid Waste Landfill: No pollutants limits. Requirements in 40 CFR 257, 258, and 261 apply. Sludge use and disposal methods
122
121 Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Sludge Ceiling Limits = Sludge Percent Sludge Ceiling Solids as average mgd (8.34) Limit, mg/kg decimal to disposal (POTW RR as decimal) Tab 3-C, pages 34-43 - Sludge Specific Gravity assumed to be 1, same as water. - Yours significantly different? Contact PERCS AHL: Based on Land App/Compost Using Ceiling Concentration Limits
123
Water Quality Standards Sludge Loading for Nickel - based on Ceiling Sludge Loading NPDES Permit Limits WWTP SIU’s 42% RR Residential Commercial 0.164 mg/l (9.7978 #/ day) Influent 7.168MGD Land Application Standards Digester Given: 420 mg/kg std. from permit 1164.9 acres permitted 4.4 % solids 0.0267 MGD flow to disposal SIUs
124
123 Allowable Headworks Loading (AHL) based on Cumulative Sludge Limit = (CAR in lbs/acre)(SA in acres) (SL, years)(POTW RR as decimal)(365 days/year) (Cumulative Applic. Limit)(Total Permitted Acres) (Site Life)(Removal Rate)(365/year) Tab 3-C, pages 34-43 AHL: Based on Land Application Using Cumulative App Limit
125
124 Tab 3-C, page 36 Tab 3-C, page 36
126
125 Tab 3-C, page 37 Tab 3-C, page 37
127
126 Tab 3-C, page 38 Tab 3-C, page 38
128
127 Tab 3-C, page 39 Tab 3-C, page 39
129
128 If Attachment A of Sludge Permit shows sources in addition to WWTP for this HWA, acres in Attachment B must be adjusted accordingly. Discuss in HWA Narrative. Tab 3-C, page 40 Tab 3-C, page 40
130
129 If Attachment A of Sludge Permit shows sources in addition to WWTP for this HWA, acres in Attachment B must be adjusted accordingly. Discuss in HWA Narrative. Tab 3-C, page 41 Tab 3-C, page 41
131
130 Tab 3-C, page 42 Tab 3-C, page 42
132
131 Tab 3-C, page 43 Tab 3-C, page 43
133
132 Review HWA Spreadsheet Column C – Tab 3-A, page 2 – Enter values for: Sludge Permit Number Class of Sludge Disposal A for Compost; B for Land App Sludge Flow and % Solids to Disposal Sludge Site Acres and Site Life Tab 3-A, page 4 Spreadsheet automatically selected sludge standards based on A or B Spreadsheet calculated sludge AHLs
134
133 Review HWA Spreadsheet Site Life – Cell C18 – Tab 3-A, page 2 Can calculate by dividing annual load on most heavily loaded field by cumulative limit Will likely get very large value - 100-500 years If use this value in HWA, will likely get very small Cumulative Sludge AHL Most POTWs use 20 to 50 years
135
134 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
136
135 Tab 3-A, page 4 Tab 3-A, page 4
137
136 Tab 1 Tab 1
138
Notice To Composters! The previous example was for land applied sludge or “Class B” If you compost your sludge, also called “Class A” or “Distribution and Marketing,” entering “A” in cell C13 will automatically adjust Tab 3-A page 4 of HWA worksheet to use the applicable standards
139
138 AHL: Based on Incineration Contact PERCS to discuss requirements
140
Determines the Amount of Pollutant the POTW can Treat Based on the Most Restrictive Criteria
141
140 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 5 Final AHLs for each criteria shown Pass Through / Design Inhibition Sludge Smallest one is chosen as the – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading (MAHL)
142
141 Tab 3-A, page 5 Tab 3-A, page 5
143
142 Land Application Standards WWTP SIUs Aeration Basin Clarifier Disinfection Digester NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Influent Uncontrollable Load Residential Commercial Non-SIUs
144
143 Determine Uncontrolled Load Everything that contributes to POTW not covered in SIU Permit Everything that contributes to POTW not covered in SIU Permit Residential Residential Non-Residential, but not SIU, for example: Non-Residential, but not SIU, for example: Commercial Commercial Hospitals, Funeral Homes Hospitals, Funeral Homes Doctors, Dentists Doctors, Dentists Car Repair/Wash Centers Car Repair/Wash Centers Inflow/Infiltration Inflow/Infiltration ALL Non-SIUs ALL Non-SIUs
145
144 Uncontrolled load may be determined in two ways: Mass Balance Method Sum of SIU Load for each POC Subtract total SIU Load from POTW Influent Load Sampling Method Sample for uncontrolled pollutants per LTMP
146
145 Average Influent values from Removal Rate Spreadsheet – Tab 3-B, pages 19-28 Average SIU values from SIU Data summaries – Tab 3-D, pages 52-84 Average Uncontrollable values from Uncontrollable data summary, if available [N/A for Typicalville] SlU Uncontrollable Mass Balance Spreadsheet – Tab 3-D, pages 48-51 What Do I Need To Calculate Uncontrollable Load?
147
146 Review Mass Balance Spreadsheet Tab 3-D, pages 48-51 Enter Average SIU flow and mg/l values Tab 3-D, pages 52-84 Enter Average POTW flow and Average Influent mg/l values in row 21 Tab 3-B, pages 19-28 Enter Uncontrollable mg/l values If available Compare uncontrollable mass balance, sampling, and literature values Choose one to be used in HWA…
148
147 Tab 3-D, page 48 Tab 3-D, page 48
149
148 Tab 3-D, page 49 Tab 3-D, page 49
150
149 Choosing Uncontrollable Value to be used in HWA …compare uncontrollable mass balance, sampling, and literature values… …and choose one for HWA? Which one is more… Reasonable? Representative? Conservative? Remember, for uncontrollable, “larger” is more conservative
151
150 Uncontrolled Mass Balance Troubleshooting Inaccurate flow or pollutant data In particular, SIU flow data Limited data set Widely variable detection levels Inflow and Infiltration Degradation of the pollutant in the collection system Conservative/non conservative pollutant
152
151 Uncontrollable Sampling Troubleshooting Sample location not really “uncontrolled” 1 house and 27 restaurants new subdivision (low flow toilets, no sewer leaks) No commercial and/or non-SIU Inaccurate sample collection May need >1 sampling point or larger data set Flow may be too low BOD will degrade in the collection system
153
152 Review Spreadsheets Chose uncontrollable values to be used in HWA Tab 3-D, pages 48-51 Enter Uncontrollable flow in cell C9 Tab 3-A, page 2 of HWA Spreadsheet Enter chosen uncontrollable values and sources to HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 6, columns E and F
154
153 Tab 3-D, page 49 Tab 3-D, page 49
155
154 Tab 3-A, page 2 Tab 3-A, page 2
156
155 Tab 3-A, page 6 Tab 3-A, page 6
157
156 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
158
Uncontrollable As Zero If all of the influent data for a particular pollutant of concern is all less than the current best available detection level. If the program does sampling of the collection system and sample results less than the current best detection level can be averaged as zeros. 157
159
Uncontrollable As Zero Cont. Arsenic -2.0 µg/L Cadmium – 0.50 ug/l Chromium - 10 µg/L Copper – 2.0 µg/L Lead - 2.0 µg/L Mercury – 1.0 ng/L (EPA Method 1631E) Molybdenum - 10 µg/L Silver – 1.0 µg/L Selenium - 5.0 µg/L Zinc - 10 µg/L * Red Highlighted are lower than the current model LTMP/STMP 158
160
Uncontrollable As Zero Cont. There may be other circumstances under which the uncontrollable concentration can be considered zero but they will be evaluated on a case-by- case basis. 159
161
Determines the Amount of MAHL Available to your Industries
162
161 Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) MAIL = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading, lbs/day MAIL = Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading, lbs/day MAHL = Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading, lbs/day MAHL = Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading, lbs/day SF = Safety Factor, if desired SF = Safety Factor, if desired MAIL= MAHL – UNC Load - SF
163
162 Review HWA Spreadsheet Tab 3-A, page 6 MAILs calculated in column H Any negative numbers? Typicalville - None so far….
164
163 Tab 3-A, page 6 Tab 3-A, page 6
165
Allocating The MAIL To Your Industries SIU’s
166
Example Allocation Nickel
167
166 NPDES Permit Limits Water Quality Standards Sludge Standards WWTP Residential 42% RR 0.1229 lbs./day (4.1 ugl @ 3.594 MGD) combined Uncon. 3.6 MGD Allocating Nickel Allocating Nickel 9.8 lbs/ day Influent - based on Sludge Ceiling 7.168 MGD SIU #3 Commercial SIU #1 SIU #2 0.9925 lbs.day (2.38 mg/l @ 0.05 MGD) 0.85 MGD
168
167 Review Allocation Table Click on “AT” tab in lower left corner AT Worksheet within HWA_AT workbook Tab 3-A, pages 7-10 MAHLs, Basis for MAHL, Uncontrollable Loads, and MAILs automatically filled in from HWA worksheet Enter SIU info + permit limits in Row 12 Review MAIL left in Row 20 Any negative numbers?
169
168 Tab 3-A, page 7 Tab 3-A, page 7
170
169 Safety Factor / MAHL Reserve Tab 3-A, pages 7-10 Row 29 - % MAIL still available Row 30 - % MAHL still available Buffer against SIU IUP violations Uncertainty in HWA calculations Reserve for future growth Especially for POCs based on Design
171
Example Allocation Cyanide
172
171 Tab 3-A, page 8 Tab 3-A, page 8
173
172 Generally Should you be over allocated? For example, if MAHL based on NPDES limit, are you violating that limit? Any typos, missing/changed formulas? Review your choices for all values Did you have other choices to make? Can you lower SIU limits (pollutant or flow)? What Do I Do When I’m Over Allocated?
174
173 Specifically Stream Standard Limiting for copper, silver, zinc? If yes, can you delete Action Levels? Is Inhibition Limiting? If yes, can you use site-specific Inhibition criteria? Is Sludge Limiting? If yes, can you lower site life? Can you perform HASL Worksheet? What Do I Do When I’m Over Allocated?
175
174 Should Typicalville be over allocated? Arsenic MAHL based on sludge ceiling Are they violating that limit? Tab 3-C, page 37 and 43 If no, can they perform HASL Worksheet? Can/should they lower SIU limits (pollutant or flow)? Typicalville Over Allocated for Arsenic
176
175 Tab 3-C, page 37 Tab 3-C, page 37
177
176 Tab 3-C, page 43 Tab 3-C, page 43
178
Headworks Addendum for Sludge Loading
179
178 HASL Worksheet Re-evaluates AHL for Sludge Criteria by taking into consideration: 1.Historical WWTP Performance Data, 2.Historical Sludge Report Data, and 3.Applicable Sludge Criteria Only applicable for pollutants over allocated based on sludge criteria!
180
179 What Do I Need For A HASL? Copy of current Sludge Permit Copy of current Annual Sludge Report POTW Influent Data from Removal Rate Calculations HASL Worksheet and Calculations
181
180 HASL – Step 1 - Arsenic Cumulative Criteria Check POC to assure that the available land does not exceed 80% of the Cumulative Loading Rate. Actual Cumulative Load From Actual Cumulative Load From Most Heavily Loaded Field *(100) <= 80% Most Heavily Loaded Field *(100) <= 80% Cumulative Sludge Loading Limit For the Pretreatment World, the “most heavily loaded field” is the field with the highest cumulative lbs/acre for that pollutant.
182
181 HASL – Step 1 From current Annual Sludge Report, locate Land Application Field Summary Reports. Review “Cumulative lbs/acre” values for HASL POC for each field. Identify field with highest cumulative lbs/acre for HASL POC – Pretreatment’s “most heavily Loaded field” Enter value in column C of HASL worksheet in HWA_AT workbook (spreadsheet) Any flags? Contact PERCS
183
182 Field RC 00123 0002 has 0.186 lbs/acre of arsenic land applied so far. Is there another field with more arsenic? Tab 3-C, page 45 Tab 3-C, page 45
184
183 Field RC 00123 0001 has 0.466 lbs/acre of arsenic. Note also most heavily loaded for copper and mercury. Tab 3-C, page 46 Tab 3-C, page 46
185
184 Tab 3-C, page 47 Tab 3-C, page 47
186
185 HASL – Step 2 - Arsenic Ceiling Criteria Check POC to assure that sludge does not exceed 80% of the Sludge Ceiling Limit Maximum mg/kg Maximum mg/kg from Sludge Report *(100) <= 80% from Sludge Report *(100) <= 80% Sludge Ceiling mg/kg Limit Sludge Ceiling mg/kg Limit
187
186 HASL – Step 2 From current Annual Sludge Report, locate Annual Residual Sampling Summary Forms Review “mg/kg dry weight” values values for HASL POC for each sample. Identify highest “mg/kg dry weight” Enter value in column H of HASL worksheet in HWA_AT workbook (spreadsheet) Any flags? Contact PERCS
188
187 8/1/07 sample highest arsenic – 7.3 mg/kg. Note 8/1/07 also has highest for cadmium, molybdenum, and selenium. Tab 3-C, page 43 Tab 3-C, page 43
189
188 Tab 3-C, page 47 Tab 3-C, page 47
190
189 HASL – Step 3 - Arsenic Recalculate Sludge HASL AHL A new Sludge AHL is calculated using historical POTW influent and % of Ceiling Concentration AHL based on Sludge/HASL = Average Influent Loads, lbs/day Average Influent Loads, lbs/day % of ceiling mg/kg Limit % of ceiling mg/kg Limit based on highest sludge sample based on highest sludge sample
191
190 HASL – Step 3 Locate HWA Removal Rate Calculations Identify Average Influent value for HASL POC Enter value in column M of HASL worksheet in HWA_AT workbook (spreadsheet) HASL Spreadsheet will calculate HASL sludge AHL
192
191 Tab 3-B, page 22 Tab 3-B, page 22
193
192 Tab 3-C, page 47 Tab 3-C, page 47
194
193 Now What? Does HASL indicate Flags? If yes, must do Metals Management plan - contact PERCS Are there any sludge violations? If yes, cannot use Sludge/HASL AHL – contact PERCS If no flags and no sludge violations - you can use Sludge/HASL AHL!
195
194 Review HWA worksheet HWA worksheet Tab 3-A page 6 - Enter “X” in column D for HASL POC. HWA worksheet Tab 3-A page 4 - New HASL MAHL automatically appears in columns D, H, and/or I as applicable HWA worksheet Tab 3-A page 5 – worksheet chooses new MAHL Review Tab 3-A page 6 and AT Over Allocation Resolved?
196
195 Tab 3-A, page 6 Tab 3-A, page 6
197
196 Tab 3-A, page 4 Tab 3-A, page 4
198
197 Tab 3-A, page 8 Tab 3-A, page 8
199
198 Tab 3-A, page 1C Tab 3-A, page 1C
200
199 Collect Data Calculate RR Calculate Sludge AHL Calculate Inhibition AHL Calculate Pass-Thru AHL Calculate Non-SIU Load Develop MAHL Determine MAIL Reduce Limits Use HASL Review UNC Allocate SIU Limits Over Allocation Done Calculate SIU Load Yes No Headworks Analysis: Flow Diagram
201
200 Transmittal Letter Transmittal Letter Organized Data Summaries Organized Data Summaries DMR/LTMP/STMP, SIU, Uncontrolled DMR/LTMP/STMP, SIU, Uncontrolled Related LTMP sampling Related LTMP sampling Removal Rates Calculation spreadsheet Removal Rates Calculation spreadsheet HWA.AT.HASL spreadsheet HWA.AT.HASL spreadsheet Documents Needed to Submit HWA
202
201 Mass Balance spreadsheet Mass Balance spreadsheet Plant Design Documentation Plant Design Documentation Copy of applicable pages from Land Application or Composting permit Copy of applicable pages from Land Application or Composting permit Copy of applicable parts of sludge report Copy of applicable parts of sludge report Explanation/Discussion of Choices, Assumptions, etc. Explanation/Discussion of Choices, Assumptions, etc. Documents Needed to Submit HWA
203
202 Division Pretreatment Contacts Monti Hassan: (919) 807-6314 Sarah Morrison Bass: (919) 807-6310 Deborah Gore:(919) 807-6383 FAX:(919) 807-6489 Email: firstname.lastname@ncdenr.gov Physical Address: 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/pret
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.