1. Status of CalCAP Implementation Judy Chess, UC Berkeley UC/CSU/CCC Sustainability Conference July 2008 August 1, 2008

2. The UC Project Management Institute is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on completion of this program will be reported to CES Records for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for non-AIA members are available upon request (emily.montan@ucop.edu). This program is registered with the AIA-CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.emily.montan@ucop.edu

3. Climate Action Partnership CACS initiated a feasibility study in 2006-07 that led to Chancellor’s Climate Action Commitment in April 2007. Inventory Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions Engage with campus decision-makers/stakeholders Analyze GHG emissions reduction scenarios Evaluate options to meet targets Evaluate financial feasibility Develop institutional model for implementation

4.  Carbon is a criteria for choosing projects  Internationally recognized standard  Carbon can provide an easy metric to measure progress  Campus used conservative estimates  scale and scope of projects  cost (middle or high range)  benefits (did not count environmental or programmatic benefits from carbon reduction) CalCAP Focused on GHG

5. 2007 UCB Emissions Inventory http://sustainability.berkeley.edu/calcap/ GHG emissions were approximately 208,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. For a campus population of 49,000, this corresponds to 12 kgCO2/person/day.

6. Carbon Footprint vs. Emissions Inventory

7. Scenarios analyzed in feasibility study Assumptions: Emissions expect to grow to 225,000 based on 2020 LRDP Use 1990 levels as base year

8. Target: Reduce to 1990 Levels by 2014

9. Emissions Reduction Options A. Infrastructure Projects Energy efficiency – e.g. Strategic Energy Plan -- Retrofits (lighting, HVAC), solar, Energy Star B. Behavioral Projects Campus energy efficiency - e.g. Energy conservation campaigns, bike plan C. Renewable Energy Certificates/Credits (RECs) Certificates for electricity from renewable sources – e.g. wind/solar generated electricity, LEED Credit EA 6 D. Carbon Offsets: Methods of reducing carbon emissions (on or off-site) e.g. Methane capture technology

10. Projects analyzed for both GHG emissions & financial returns Projects ranked according to 6 criteria: 1. $/Metric ton GHG reduction 2. Capital Cost 3. Annual Savings 4. Simple payback 5. Total Net Present Value 6. Annual GHG Reduction Potential

11. Assessing Project Mix +-- Infrastructure Projects Campus investment, paybacks and savings Upfront cost Behavioral Projects Campus collaboration Coordination expense – labor intensive Renewable Energy Certificates/Credits (RECs) Credit for 100% renewable at low cost Annual cost of purchase without ownership Carbon Offsets Credit for reducing emissions at low cost Reduction may not be permanent or real

12. Campus Energy Efficiency Projects UC/IOU Statewide Energy Partnership Increases available IOU funding from previous partnerships’ $23M over six years to a projected $300M (scalable based on UC plan need) over next six years Financing via Office of the President Development of Central Funding Mechanism Portfolio analysis by funding source (e.g. Purchased Utilities, auxiliaries e.g. Housing, Athletics

13. Building by building project list, e.g.: –Measures by air handler –Measures by lamp and ballast type Project cost; savings (annual kWh, therms); incentives; returns Cogeneration effects 13 Campus Energy Efficiency Projects

14. Standard Air Handler Projects –Conventional Air Handlers –Laboratory Air Handlers and Hoods –Hospital Air Handlers –Kitchen Ventilation Standard Lighting Projects –Lamp and Ballast –Occupancy Controls –Daylight Harvesting –Parking Lot Conversion –Gym Conversion 14 Campus Energy Efficiency Projects

15. Lessons Use data you have; improve over time Collaboration and broad participation Remain focused and practical… …Still set ambitious target Leverage energy of students Create institutional bridge(s) to implementation Shared accountability

16. Where We Stand Now - 2008-09 Project implementation: SEP - Some projects started (2006-08) or planned that will get campus 50% of the way (2009-14) On-going monitoring and reporting: Data needs vigilance; transparency requires increased reporting; FS, Budget Office, Office of Sustainability Funding challenges: Diffuse versus centralized sustainability fund; Office of Sustainability work program Academic context - Turnover of students – student initiative, energy and labor support (Building Sustainability @ Cal, LEED EB), faculty engagement

17. UCB Sustainability: Beyond GHG Teaching Over 450 environmental courses Multiple student-led courses: Building Sustainability @ Cal, CalCAP Research Energy Biosciences Institute Joint Bioenergy Institutive Helios Other Initiatives FS -- Water conservation; Comfort cooling policy; LEED standards; energy eff. in laboratories Waste reduction and recycling Food Green Purchasing

18. QUESTIONS? This concludes the American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems Program. UC Project Management Institute is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems