1. CAEP Standard 2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Rebeca Orama, UPRM

2. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates The provider ensures that effective partnerships and high-quality clinical practice are central to preparation so that candidates develop the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions necessary to demostrate positive impact on all P-12 students´ learning and development.

3. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Partnership for Clinical Preparation Partners co-construct mutually beneficial P-12 school and community arrangements, including technology-based collaborations, for clinical preparation and share responsibility for continuous improvment of candidate preparation.

4. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Partnership for Clinical Preparation Partnerships for clinical preparation can follow a range of forms, participants, and functions. They establish mutually agreeable expectations for candidate entry, preparation, and exit; ensure that theory and practice are linked; maintain coherence across clinical and academic components of preparation; and share accountability for candidate outcomes.

5. Activity Directions Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Individually, write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2.

6. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Clinical Educators Partners co-select, prepare, evaluate, support, and retain high-quality clinical educators, both provider- and school-based, who demostrate a positive impact on candidates´ development and P-12 students learning and development.

7. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Clinical Educators In collaboration with their partners, providers use multiple indicators and appropriate technology- based applications to establish, maintain, and refine criteria for selection, professional development, performance evaluation, continuous improvement, and retention of clinical educators in all clinical placement settings.

8. Activity Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Individually, write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2. Directions

9. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Clinical Experiences The provider works with partners to design clinical experiences of sufficient depth, breadth, diversity, coherence, and duration to ensure that candidates demostrate their developing effectiveness and positive impact on all students´learning and development.

10. Standard 2 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Clinical Experience Clinical experiences, including technology-enhanced learning opportunities, are structured to have multiple performance-based assessments at key points within the program to demostate canditates´ development of the knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions, as delineated in Standard 1, that are associated with a positive impact on the learning and develpment of all P-12 students.

11. Activity Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates With a partner(s), write in a piece of paper the evidence available or new one that could support this part of Standard 2. Directions

12. EvidenceEvidence Session findings Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org |w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdates@CAEPupdates

13. Self-Study ReportSelf-Study Report Your Self-study Report starts with evidence. What is this item of evidence? How was the quality of the evidence determined or assured? What criteria of success have been established on the measure, and how? What does the reported evidence mean? How is the evidence used to support improvement? Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates

14. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation EvidenceEvidence Additional evidenceideas! AppendixD CAEP 2013 Standards for Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates

15. Standard 2 Accreditation@caepnet.org Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates The CAEP Evidence Guide describes perspectives on the use of data in educator preparation and accreditation as a "culture of evidence" that influences opportunities and expectations for both educator preparation providers and CAEP itself. The Evidence Guide also provides guidance for EPPs on assuring the quality of evidence as well as the design of data collection, analysis, and reporting. Guide to Self-study Reports and Evidence