1. Give ‘em What They Want: Patron-Driven Collection Development Hope Barton, Associate University Librarian, Services, U of Iowa Mike Wright, Acquisitions & Rapid Cataloging, U of Iowa Kit Clatanoff, Collection Development Manager, YBP Karen Fischer, Collections Analysis & Planning, U of Iowa Charleston Conference | Nov. 4, 2010

2. Our Ebook History Vague exploration of e-books across publishers and disciplines (2007-2009) CIC 2009 Consortium for Library Initiatives Conference: Off the Shelf: Defining Collection Services http://www.cic.net/Home/Calendar/Confere nces/Library/2009/Home.aspx

3. Off the Shelf: Rick Lugg Kent Study: Use of library materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study. Books in library and Information science, v. 26. New York, M. Dekker, 1979

4. Off the Shelf: Lugg cont’d 39.8% monographs never circulated during their first 6 years For books that didn’t circulate in first 2 years, chances of ever circulating were 1 in 4 If a book didn’t circulate within first 6 years, chances of ever circulating were 1 in 50

5. Off the Shelf: Lugg cont’d 54.2% of titles purchased in 1969 would not have been ordered if at least 2 uses were established as a criterion for a cost effective acquisitions program At ARL institutions, 56% of books never circulate

6. Off the Shelf: Dennis Dillon Among ARL libraries, printed books on median have an 8% chance of circulating in any given year, or once every 12.5 years Conclusion: Books are an underperforming asset

7. E-books, here we come! Initial conversation with our friends at YBP, ALA Annual, July 2009 Full discussion with YBP about our PDA needs, post ALA, July 2009 PDA pilot with YPB/Ebrary began late August 2009 From pilot to production, fall 2010

8. Specifics for PDA Ebooks only Non-mediated approach to title acquisition by patrons Instantaneous access to the ebook Duplication control against ebooks owned by the University

9. Specifics UI deposited $25K to start 10 uses would trigger a purchase PDA pilot would not be announced to the public ebrary would provide MARC records to load into our catalog

10. Specifics Initial offering of 100K titles – no attempt to limit other than de-duplication against ebrary’s Academic Complete set Synergies of the Universe: by accident we loaded only 19K titles; this may have saved the pilot

11. Specifics By Nov. 30 (started Oct. 1) we spent $28K on 262 titles; weekly spend amount was increasing Clearly this was not sustainable given our finances Rather than bail, we regrouped

12. PDA2: The Fix While pleased with user response, the pace was unsustainable In conversation with YBP we decided to run the PDA title list against our virtual approval profile –Also applied YBP’s “pop” filter –Limited set to titles from 2008 on

13. PDA2: The Fix We had also purchased ebook collections from Wiley, Elsevier, and Springer; those were blocked When the results came in, fewer than 600 titles remained Date limitation was changed back to 2005 – boosted number to 9K

14. Working Pilot – YBP Mechanics Bring in PDA titles from ebrary Profile titles against U Iowa requirements Return to ebrary for MARC information Titles loaded to UIA catalog

15. Print Profile Requirements 105 Exclusions in LC Subjects 31 Exclusions in Non-Subjects 2,000 Exclusions by Publisher/Series Exclusion of any duplicate editions

16. Beyond Print Requirements Low number of titles in the initial profiling against print offered alternative solutions: Alter the ebook profiling requirements Adopt an ebook profile to match the print requirements exactly.

17. PDA Profile Requirements Exclude Academic Complete titles Exclude ebooks owned by the library Exclude Popular and Juvenile titles Exclude LC Classes K-KZD Limit by price Exclude specified publisher offerings

18. PDA Now ebrary added add’l titles which went through the same limits, bringing collection to about 12K Even though new titles aren’t being added by ebrary for now users continue to buy from the existing stock

19. PDA – Next Phase Development at YBP and ebrary for the next phase of the PDA tied to feedback from our beta partners

20. PDA – Next Phase Use of YBP profiling methodology Weekly updates to PDA pool based on the individual library profile New purchase triggers with ebrary

21. New Trigger Definition Viewing 10 pages of the body of a book in a single session Any copy or print Time-based use of a book for 10 minutes or more

22. PDA – Next Phase Short term loans Duplication detection Up-to-date PDA purchase history in GOBI

23. PDA – Next Phase Ongoing dialogue is key

24. Usage Analysis 11-12 months of data for usage and PDA purchases (Sept/Oct ‘09 – Sept ‘10) 12,947 PDA titles in catalog | 47,367 Academic Complete titles (subscription) in catalog “user session” = how many times a patron uses a book in unique ebrary sessions

25. PDA Spending

26. PDA Publishers

27. PDA Publishers con’t

28. Amacom analysis

29. PDA Subject Analysis

30. PDA Usage – Most used titles

31. PDA Usage

32. PDA & Print Duplicates 714 PDA titles purchased in 11-month period 166 print duplicates (23%)

33. Print Duplicates Circulation Stats

34. Print PDA Duplicates – publication date

35. Total ebrary Title Usage – 11 mos.

36. Title Usage – most used publishers

37. Title Usage – average use/title

38. University Presses – user sessions

39. University Presses – avg. use/title

40. Title Usage- Subject Analysis

41. Most used ebrary titles

42. Future analyses YBP and ebrary will share data – coming early 2011. Hope to get better data to analyze the subscription titles from ebrary. Statistics will change with ebrary’s change to definition of a “trigger” for purchase (Oct ‘10).

43. Conclusions & Questions Publishers are interested in all the data. What does PDA mean for collection management policies? For budget allocations? Ebooks data and management - in it’s infancy. Changes in our collection development practices Trust the patron!

44. Copyright Copyright 2010 by Hope Barton, Kit Clatanoff, Karen Fischer, and Michael Wright, This work is copyrighted under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial 3.0 License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/