1. www.saalasti.fi Energy Chips from Stumps with Lower Costs: JPK-20150527Saalasti Oy 1

2. www.saalasti.fi Saalasti Oy 2 JPK-20150527 Stump Stationary Crushing Saalasti Crush H 25-60T/h (bone dry), 150-400 loose-m3/h Saalasti Crush 1224H installation processing stumps in Kaipola, Finland Particle size P63-P100 (1.3€/MWh) Stationary crushing cost 1.3€/MWh (6 years / 5%) According to Metsäteho (Roadside crushing 3.9€/MWh) Storage for ~4 days operation in full capacity

3. www.saalasti.fi Saalasti Stationary Stump Crushing Saalasti Oy 3 JPK-20150527 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0EQQosrYto Please check the link below

4. www.saalasti.fi Mobile and Stationary The most cost efficient way to produce energy chips is the stationary processor which is operated in cold supply chain (e.g. inside a power plant). Energy chips produced in hot supply chain costs more, because of higher costs of logistics and energy. Most common chippers for biomass are mobile and some have been converted for stationary operation Saalasti makes biomass processors which have been designed to be stationary from the beginning Saalasti Oy 4 JPK-20150527

5. www.saalasti.fi Key Issues in Crushing Costs Motor efficiency, diesel vs electric Maintenance, mobility vs robustness Lifetime, mobility vs rebuildability Saalasti Oy 5 Saalasti Crush 1224H processing stumps and forest resudue bundles in Kyminvoima Finland JPK-20150527

6. www.saalasti.fi Crushing Cost Comparison Saalasti Oy 6 Manual handling +0.7€/MWh JPK-20150527

7. www.saalasti.fi Investment Comparison 15MWe Production Saalasti Crush H vs 2x mobile with equal capacity: E.g. 100% loan, full amortization in 6 years, 5% interest. Saalasti Oy 7 JPK-20150527 With manual handling +0.7€/MWh

8. www.saalasti.fi Investment Sensitivity 8MWe Production Saalasti Crush H vs 1x mobile with equal capacity: E.g. 100% loan, full amortization in 6 years, 5% interest. Saalasti Oy 8 JPK-20150527 With manual handling +0.7€/MWh

9. www.saalasti.fi Chipping Costs in Longer Run Larger the scale, larger the savings Medium size stationary process line VS 2x robust mobile crusher Processing 130 000 t/a = 492 000 MWh/a (15 MWe consumption) Years 1 → 6 the savings: 342 000 €/a (+ per manual handling 344 000 €/a) Years 7 → +20 savings: 760 000 €/a (+ per manual handling 344 000 €/a) Main argument: For 10 MWe and larger biomass users economical benefits of stationary crushing are obvious and even in smaller scale similar benefits are obtainable. Saalasti Oy 9 JPK-20150527

10. www.saalasti.fi Caledonia, UK (UPM) Saalasti Oy 10 JPK-20150527 Saalasti Crush H processing round wood and forest residue bundles

11. www.saalasti.fi Huelva, Spain (Ence) Saalasti Oy 11 Saalasti Crush H processing eucalyptus stumps and forest residues and Saalasti Chipper H processing eucalyptus round wood JPK-20150527

12. www.saalasti.fi Lappeenranta, Finland (UPM) Saalasti Oy 12 Saalasti Crush H processing stumps and forest residues JPK-20150527

13. www.saalasti.fi Thank You! Saalasti Oy 13 Reference article: STATIONARY BIOMASS PROCESSORS – CRUSHING STUMPS WITH LOWER COSTS Author: Juha Kettunen, Saalasti Oy Juvan teollisuuskatu 28, 02920 Espoo, Finland, phone +358 9 2511 550, mob. +358 40 7091528 e-mail: juha.kettunen@saalasti.fi JPK-20150527