1. R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOL R ESPONSE TO I NTERVENTION P ILOT A PRIL 7, 2016 Janet Seabold, Dawn Mazzola, Charlotte Weeks, & Theresa Serafimov

2. A REVIEW OF RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention system to maximize student achievement. With RTI, our schools identify students at risk of insufficient acquisition of skills, monitors individual student progress, provides evidence-based interventions, and adjusts the intensity and nature of those interventions depending on a student’s responsiveness. This allows the teacher to create a personal learning path for each student.

3. R IDGEFIELD RTI P ROGRAM E XPANSION & I MPROVEMENTS  An intervention specialist is assigned on a full time basis to Grades K – 6  All teachers in Grades K – 3 have been trained in Recipe for Reading, which directly aligns to our intervention program  Students in Grades K – 6 are being assessed using the AIMSweb program three times per year  Students who are identified as requiring RTI services are being progress monitored every six weeks to determine progress  The AIMSweb assessment system allows administration to determine student, as well curricular weaknesses within our elementary programming  Services have been expanded to Grades 7 – 9 through the use of the Achieve 3000 online reading program

4. O NGOING S TUDENT A SSESSMENT : AIMS WEB AIMSweb continues to be the computer program used in Ridgefield. It stores and norms student data, allowing for frequent progress monitoring and analysis. AIMSweb is used for the universal screening of all students, which results in the identification of students at risk for academic failure. What is progress monitoring?  AIMSweb provides quick probe assessments in a variety of subject areas that can be administered as often as once per week. This helps the specialist to determine whether or not the intervention is meeting the student’s academic needs.  Students scoring below the 25 th percentile in reading, written expression, and math computation are given explicit, systematic instruction and progress monitored regularly.  Program success is determined, in part, by the rates of improvement being met by the students whose progress is being monitored.

5. S AMPLE D ATA R EPORTING : S TUDENT A  Aimsweb reports indicated that Student A was not projected to reach the Rate of Improvement (R.O.I.). The student did not make the expected growth.

6. S TUDENT A S TUDENT A T HE A IMSWEB DATA ALLOWED THE R.T.I. TEAM TO IDENTIFY A STUDENT AT RISK OF ACADEMIC FAILURE. I N ADDITION, THE DATA WAS USED TO HELP DEFINE THE SKILLS S TUDENT A NEEDED IN ORDER TO BE MORE SUCCESSFUL IN READING COMPREHENSION. S TUDENT A’ S EARLY DATA INDICATED THAT HE COULD DECODE, HOWEVER HAD NOT YET ACHIEVED THE ADEQUATE FLUENCY RATE. F LUENCY INSTRUCTION AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN ORAL READING WERE ADDED TO S TUDENT A’ S PROGRAM.

7. S TUDENT B T HIS STUDENT HAS MADE ADEQUATE SCORES ON HIS BENCHMARK TESTING AND MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INELIGIBLE FOR SERVICES. D UE TO FREQUENT PROGRESS MONITORING, WE ARE ABLE TO TRACK HIS INCONSISTENT PERFORMANCE AND TARGET NEEDS THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN MISSED.

8. S TUDENT C S TUDENT C WAS FOUND TO BE AT RISK DURING THE U NIVERSAL S CREENING PROCESS. S TUDENT C LACKED EARLY NUMERACY SKILLS. T HIS STUDENT RECEIVED I NTERVENTION S ERVICES AND WAS MONITORED OVER A SIX - WEEK PERIOD. W ITH DIRECT EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION, S TUDENT C WAS ABLE TO CLOSE HIS LEARNING GAP. F REQUENT PROGRESS MONITORING INDICATED THAT HE HAD MET HIS GOAL AND NO LONGER REQUIRED R.T.I SERVICES.

9. S TUDENT D T HROUGH U NIVERSAL SCREENING, STUDENT D WAS FOUND TO BE AT RISK IN MATH COMPUTATION. U PON FURTHER EXAMINATION OF HER TEST, IT WAS NOTED THAT SHE LACKED R APID A UTOMATED R ESPONSE WHEN PRESENTED WITH ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION FACTS. F LASHCARDS AND FREQUENT TIMED FLUENCY DRILLS WERE THE RECOMMENDED INTERVENTION TO ASSIST IN INCREASING HER RAPID AUTOMATED RESPONSE WHILE COMPLETING COMPUTATION PROBLEMS. T HIS GRAPH INDICATES HER SLOW, BUT STEADY, IMPROVEMENT.

10. S ECOND G RADE D ATA C HANGES S ECOND G RADE D ATA C HANGES T HE SECOND GRADE SAW A DECREASE IN THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS FALLING BELOW THE 25 TH PERCENTILE IN M ATH C ONCEPTS AND A PPLICATIONS, BUT AN INCREASE IN STUDENTS FALLING BELOW THE 25 TH PERCENTILE IN M ATH C OMPUTATION. T HIS WAS DISCOVERED TO BE DUE TO AN EMPHASIS IN C OMMON C ORE MATH CURRICULUM ON APPLICATION AND LESS ON STRICT COMPUTATION. A S A RESULT, A RECOMMENDATION WAS MADE TO THE CLASSROOM TEACHERS TO INCORPORATE 2- MINUTE MATH FLUENCY DRILLS WEEKLY. Second Grade1 st -10 th percentile11 th -25 th 26 th -75 th 76 th -90 th 91 st -99 th MAZE Fall81667147 MAZE Winter79642210 MComp Fall111361215 MComp Winter14255995 MCAP Fall822541314 MCAP Winter81661207 Correct Writing Sequence Fall 69622311 Correct Writing Sequence Winter 611522320

11. S ECOND G RADE D ATA C HANGES I N R EADING C OMPREHENSION, THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO FELL IN THE AVERAGE RANGE REMAINED APPROXIMATELY THE SAME FROM FALL TO WINTER. H OWEVER, WE ARE ABLE TO ANALYZE THE DATA FURTHER TO ASCERTAIN THAT, IN THE FALL, 43 OF THOSE STUDENTS FELL BELOW THE 50 TH PERCENTILE, WHILE IN THE WINTER ONLY 26 STUDENTS FELL BELOW THE 50 TH PERCENTILE. Second Grade1 st -10 th percentile11 th -25 th 26 th -75 th 76 th -90 th 91 st -99 th MAZE Fall81667147 MAZE Winter79642210 MComp Fall111361215 MComp Winter14255995 MCAP Fall822541314 MCAP Winter81661207 Correct Writing Sequence Fall 69622311 Correct Writing Sequence Winter 611522320

12. F IFTH G RADE D ATA C HANGES F IFTH G RADE D ATA C HANGES U NIVERSAL SCREENING ALLOWS US TO SEE THE BENEFITS OF INSTRUCTION FOR STUDENTS IN ALL TIERS. T HE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO FELL IN THE “ FAR ABOVE AVERAGE ” RANGE IN READING COMPREHENSION DOUBLED FROM THE FALL TO THE WINTER IN FIFTH GRADE. Fifth Grade1 st -10 th percentile11 th -25 th 26 th -75 th 76 th -90 th 91 st -99 th MAZE Fall719451812 MAZE Winter311411827 MComp Fall4153623 MComp Winter26352730 MCAP Fall515521613 MCAP Winter211522015 Correct Writing Sequence Fall 41447279 Correct Writing Sequence Winter 18582310

13. F IFTH G RADE D ATA C HANGES F IFTH G RADE D ATA C HANGES T HE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO FELL IN THE “ BELOW AVERAGE ” AND “ FAR BELOW AVERAGE ” RANGES IN WRITING WAS CUT BY HALF. Fifth Grade1 st -10 th percentile11 th -25 th 26 th -75 th 76 th -90 th 91 st -99 th MAZE Fall719451812 MAZE Winter311411827 MComp Fall4153623 MComp Winter26352730 MCAP Fall515521613 MCAP Winter211522015 Correct Writing Sequence Fall 41447279 Correct Writing Sequence Winter 18582310

14. F UTURE P LANS  Concentrating RTI Focus to K - 5  Expanding Tier 1 to include instruction within general education classes  Progress Monitor in Grades K - 5  Training teacher assistants in RTI  Achieve 3000 in grades 6 - 12  Red flag dyslexia screening in 2 nd grade

15. T HANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Questions and Comments…