1. Health and Food Safety EU Health Programme - How to apply & Draft Work Programme 2016

2. The content of this presentation does not preempt the final outcome after consultation with the Programme Committee and adoption by the Commission.

3. Background information Third Annual Work Programme under the 3 rd Health Programme Support to implementation of legislation and political committments Articulated around the 4 general objectives and thematic priorities identified in the legal basis Total available amount: nearly 58 Mio €

4. GRANTS

5. Joint Actions have a clear EU added value Co-funding 60% / 80% Country eligibility: MS /EEA They are direct grant to named beneficiaries (no open calls for proposals) MS nominate participants prior to invitation to prepare proposal Participants can be: Competent authorities Public sector bodies / NGO – via a transparent procedure Grants for actions co-financed with Member State authorities (Joint Actions)

6. Grants for actions co-financed with Member State authorities (Joint Actions) (anticipated) HIV/AIDS/STI, viral Hepatitis and TB Chronic Diseases Tobacco Control AMR & Health Care Associated Infections Blood and tissues and cells

7. Projects All projects should: provide high added value at EU level; involve at least three partners (separate legal entities) from different countries; be innovative, and normally last no longer than three years. Co-funding: 60% - up to 80% - exceptional utility 7

8. 2016 Projects (anticipated) Migrants’ health Alcohol abuse Illicit drug use Chronic diseases European Reference Networks Rare diseases Donor selection and protection

9. Calls for proposals (projects) on-line submission On-line submission system used for H2020 and other programmes No paper / e-mail submission ! Information will be on Chafea, SANCO web and the Participant Portal Evaluation & grant agreement: on-line 9

10. Important steps Get an ECAS account Register in the beneficiary registry Ensure that your potential partners are registered as well http://ec.europa.eu/research/p articipants/portal/desktop/en/o rganisations/register.html 10

11. Online application: Participants Portal Get familiar with the Participant Portal Search for a call Create a submission Part A Part B Annex http://ec.europa.eu/research /participants/portal/desktop/ en/opportunities/3hp 11

12. Operating Grants What is an operating grant? Co-finance core operating costs for non-governmental bodies (European umbrella networks) over a period that is equivalent to one accounting year 60% of expenditures can be covered (in cases of exceptional utility, the EU contribution can be 80%) In 3 rd Health Programme, the EC is now using 3 year Framework Partnership Agreements (FPAs)

13. 13 Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2017 Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2017 Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2016 Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2016 Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) Proposal Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) Proposal Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) 3 year duration (2015-2017) Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation 2015 Call for Proposals 2014 2016 2017 Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Proposal Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2015 Specific Operating Grant Agreement (SGA) 2015 Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation Positive Evaluation Plu s

14. Operating Grants No call for proposals in 2016 14 FPA concluded in 2014 (covering operating years 2015, 2016 and 2017) FPA holders will be invited to submit an application for a SGA for 2017 Important: Having received an FPA does not guarantee annual co-funding

15. PRIZES

16. Prizes Horizontal action – Health Award Action to highlight good practices of national and/or sub-national NGOs Focus: civil society contribution towards promoting a healthier EU and fairer access to healthcare for EU citizens, preventing diseases and protecting EU citizens’ health

17. PROCUREMENT

18. Procurement Calls for tender (for example, for specific research or services) are published on the CHAFEA website The main difference between is that tenders are 100% funded because once conducted the work will be ‘owned’ by the Commission, unlike projects, where the Commission contributes towards the cost of the Action but the results are ‘owned’ by the beneficiaries.

19. Public Procurement (I) Objective 1 – Promoting health, preventing diseases & fostering supportive environments for healthy lifestyles Topics include: obesity and nutrition; migrants' health; HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis and tuberculosis; neurodegenerative diseases; tobacco control

20. Public Procurement (II) Objective 2 – Protecting citizens from serious cross-border health threats Main focus: migrants' health; capacity building against health threats in Member States

21. Public Procurement (III) Objective 3 – Contributing to innovative, efficient and sustainable health systems Topics include: health innovation and HTA and e- Health; workforce planning; patients and cross- border healthcare; medical devices; pharmaceuticals and medicinal products

22. Public Procurement (IV) Objective 4 – Facilitating access to better and safer healthcare for Union citizens Topic: European Reference Networks

23. Public Procurement (V) Horizontal actions Global health General IT services Communication & dissemination

24. SELECTION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PROJECTS Eligibility criteria Exclusion criteria Selection criteria Award criteria 24

25. Eligibility criteria Applicants must be legally established. Only applicants from the 28 EU Member States plus Norway and Iceland can apply. A project proposal must be submitted by at least 3 different legal entities from 3 different eligible countries. The only eligible activities are those listed in the work programme 2016 The co-funding is meant for a future project. Running projects cannot be supported. 25

26. Exclusion criteria Exclusion from participation: being bankrupt, convicted of an offence concerning professional conduct, guilty of grave professional misconduct not in compliance with their obligations relating to the payment of taxes Exclusion from granting procedure: conflict of interest guilty of misrepresenting the information required by the Agency 26

27. Selection criteria Financial viability Not if < € 100 000 EU co-funding or if public body If > € 750 000 -> attach audit report Self-check must be performed If the self-check result is "weak" do not be discouraged from applying! Operational capacity Self-declaration Provide information on capacity 27

28. Award criteria Maximum pointsThresholdThreshold in % of max. points 1 – policy relevance 10770% 2 – technical quality 10660% 3 – management quality 10660% 4 – budget adequacy 10660% TOTAL4025 28

29. Award criterion 1 - Policy and contextual relevance Sub-criteria: Relevance of the contribution to meeting the objectives and priorities defined in the annual work plan of the 3rd Health Programme, under which the call for proposals is published, Added value at EU level in the field of public health, Pertinence of the geographical coverage of the proposals is high, Consideration of the social, cultural and political context. 29

30. Award criterion 2 - Technical quality Sub-criteria: Quality of the evidence base, Quality of the content, Innovative nature, technical complementarities and avoidance of duplication of other existing actions at EU level, Quality of the evaluation strategy, Quality of the dissemination strategy and plan. 30

31. Award criterion 3 - Management quality Sub-criteria: Quality of the planning and appropriate task distribution to implement the project, Relevance of the organisational arrangements, including financial management, Quality of the partnership. 31

32. Award criterion 4 - Overall and detailed budget Sub-criteria: Relevance and appropriateness of the budget, Consistency of the estimated cost per applicant and the corresponding activities, Realistic estimation of person months per work package, The budget allocated for evaluation and dissemination is reasonable. 32

33. Different entities can be involved in a project (I) Project coordinator Affiliated entities Several entities form one for the purpose of the action Legal and/or financial link to another beneficiary Must comply with eligibility criteria 33

34. Different entities can be involved in a project (II) Subcontractors Do not sign grant agreement Get 100% of the cost reimbursed Collaborating stakeholders Do not sign the grant agreement Cost not eligible 34

35. 35 Content preparation

36. NEW - electronic submission system Part A administrative "form": title, keywords, abstract, partners, overview budget (60/80%), checklist with criteria Part B free-flow text, according to template (PDF) You need to write your own proposals Template gives the mandatory structure 36

37. Technical Part Maximum 80 pages 50 pages for the technical description 30 pages for the budget tables One table per partner Overview table with person months per deliverable 37

38. Technical Part of the proposal 1. Problem analysis including evidence base 2. General objective of the project 2.1. Specific objective(s) of the project 3. Target groups 4. Political Relevance 4.1. Contribution to the EU Health Programme and its annual work plan 4.2. Adequacy of the project with social, cultural and political context 38

39. Technical Part of the proposal (II) 4.3. Social and economic impact 4.4. Pertinence of geographical coverage 4.5. Strategic relevance and EU added value and innovation 5. Methods and means 6. Expected outcomes 7. Work packages 7.1. Overview on work packages 7.2. Work package descriptions 7.3. Timetable or Gantt Chart 39

40. Technical Part of the proposal (III) 8. Milestones and Deliverables Note: deliverables at M18 needed ! No limit on how many deliverables ! 9. Project management structure 9.1. Quality of the partnership 9.2. Capacity of the staff 9.3. External and internal risk analysis and contingency planning 9.4. Financial management 40

41. Technical Part of the proposal (IV) 10. Budget 10.1 Content description and justification 10.2 Summary of staff effort 10.3 Detailed budget  Each partner should prepare a budget table & submit to coordinator

42. Technical Part of the proposal (V) 11. Previous and current grants relevant to the programme (limited to the last 3 years) 12. Current applications relevant to the programme 13. Exceptional Utility 14. Collaborating stakeholders - table 42

43. PART B Follow the template, but write your own proposal Have the proposal peer reviewed with the "self- evaluation form" Proposal must be submitted in PDF Proposal can be changed / resubmitted before the deadline It is the coordinator's responsibility to up-load the correct file at the time of the deadline! 43

44. Exceptional utility Co-funding may be up to 80%, but 3 criteria: At least 60 % of the total budget of the action is used to fund staff At least 30% of the budget of the proposed action is allocated to Member States whose gross national income (GNI) per inhabitant is less than 90 % of the Union average. The proposal demonstrates excellence in furthering public health in Europe and has a very high EU added value. It is your responsibility to ensure that the proposals complies with criteria 1 & 2 44

45. Annex If an applicant requests > € 750 000 EU co-funding, an audit report must be attached 45

46. Evaluation of proposals 46 1. Screening check completeness, allocation to evaluators 2. Financial & organisational analysis check compliance with the selection criteria 3. Evaluation of compliance with award criteria External Experts 4.Consensus meeting Chaired by a project officer. Outcome: consensus evaluation report 5.Evaluation committee Based on ranking: a) Ensure compliance with criteria b) Exclude potential duplication c) Decide on funding based on proposed co-funding and available budget 7.Adaptation 8.Award decision grant agreement

47. Electronic Grant preparation Grant preparation online (ping-pong principle between agency and beneficiaries) Electronic signature by LEAR (Legal entity authorised representative) – no paper copies of grant agreement Partners join the agreement after signature Monitoring and reporting online: Deliverables, Payment requests, Reports, etc. 47

48. New in Grant Management New model grant agreements (will be published with the call for proposals), which are aligned to H2020 procedures Interim Payment instead of 2 nd prefinancing Simplified cost structure (Staff, Other Costs, Subcontracting), budget shifts without amendment All partners sign the grant agreement Consortium agreements 48

49. 49 Thank you http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/