Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Risks of Thromboembolism Vs. Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Interruption of Systemic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Inpatients With Gastrointestinal.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Risks of Thromboembolism Vs. Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Interruption of Systemic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Inpatients With Gastrointestinal."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Risks of Thromboembolism Vs. Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Interruption of Systemic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Inpatients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Study N. Sengupta MD, J.D. Feuerstein MD, V.R. Patwardhan MD, E.B. Tapper MD, G.A. Ketwaroo MD, A.M. Thaker MD and D.A. Leffl er MD, MS R2 전민아 / Prof. 김정욱 The American Journal of GASTROENTEROLOGY, FEBRUARY 2015, Vol 110

2 Introduction  gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) & systemic anticoagulation  Patients on systemic anticoagulation have a 4–6% annual risk of developing GIB  Major bleeding on anticoagulation has been associated with a case fatality of rate of 8–10%  Data regarding safety of anticoagulation cessation or continuation after hospitalization for GIB are limited  Existing evidence suggests that there are risks associated with both continuing and discontinuing anticoagulation after GIB · small retrospective study : warfarin was associated with an 8.3% risk of rebleeding · Retrospective cohort study : interruption of warfarin increased the risk of thromboembolic complication and death w/o a significantly increased risk of GIB

3 Introduction  No clinical guidelines exist on appropriate timing of restarting anticoagulation following admission for GIB  Aim of the study  Compare the rate of major thromboembolic events in patients with GIB whose anticoagulation was discontinued to those patients in whom anticoagulation was resumed at discharge  Determine the rate of readmissions related to recurrent GIB as well as overall mortality within 90 days following the index episode of GIB in both groups of patients

4 Methods  single-center, prospective, observational cohort study  The study was conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC, Boston, MA, USA)  2013.4.1 ~ 2014.3.31  Patients were included evidence of clinically significant GIB  overt hematochezia, hematemesis, melena, or guaiac-positive stools with a significant drop in hemoglobin (hgb)  We obtained baseline demographic information and the following clinical data via medical record review at index hospitalization  We also recorded in-hospital management  Vit K use, transfusion, ICU care

5 Methods  Endoscopic intervention  Use of epinephrine, clips, electrocautery, or argon plasma coagulation  We categorized patients into whether anticoagulation was resumed or whether there was interruption of anticoagulation  Decision was made by the physicians directly responsible for patient care, depending on clinician and patient preferences  Interruption of anticoagulation was defined as holding systemic anticoagulation for ≥72hr after discharge  An investigator (NS, JDF, or VRP) subsequently contacted all patients by telephone 90 days after discharge

6 Methods  Thromboembolic event  venous thromboembolism(pulmonary embolism or DVT), arterial thromboembolism, stroke, or transient ischemic attack  Recurrent GIB  readmission to any hospital in the 90-day follow-up period because of another episode of GIB  Patients who developed recurrent GIB within 90 days and were admitted to this hospital were further reviewed to assess the following : admission hgb, transfusion requirements, and need for any endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention  Patients who died during initial hospitalization were excluded

7 Results 208 : on systemic anticoagulation were admitted with or developed GIB 11(5%) : died during the initial hospitalization 197 included in final analysis 121 continued on systemic anticoagulation at hospital discharge 76 interrupted systemic anticoagulation at hospital discharge treated with the following anticoagulants: warfarin(74%, n =145) enoxaparin (8%, n =15) dabigatran (6%, n =12) rivaroxaban (6%, n =11) unfractionated heparin (6%, n =12) apixaban (1%, n =2)

8 prevention of A fib-related stroke or embolization Patients continued on anticoagulation at discharge were more likely to have a history of a prosthetic valve, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or prior history of GIB Patients with anticoagulation interruption were more likely to have a history of active malignancy 63% required red blood cell transfusion need for endoscopic intervention during initial hospitalizationwas not associated with group assignment

9 Results : 90-Day outcomes: thromboembolic events  Only 12% of the original cohort was lost to follow-up before the 90-day study call  During the 90-day follow-up period after hospital discharge, 7(4%) patients developed a thromboembolic event  1 of 121(0.8%) patients who resumed anticoagulation  6 of 76 patients (8%) who had interruption or cessation of anticoagulation  3 DVT  3 stroke  1 Pulmonary embolism  All seven of the patients with thromboembolic episodes required blood transfusion during their index hospitalization

10 Results : 90-Day outcomes: thromboembolic events Patients with an active malignancy at the time of their GIB were more likely to have a thrombotic episode Need for endoscopic intervention during initial hospitalization was not associated with having recurrent GIB

11 Results : 90-Day outcomes: thromboembolic events Anticoagulation continuation was independently associated on multivariate regression with a lower risk of major thrombotic episodes within 90 days

12 Results : 90-Day outcomes: thromboembolic events  Time-to-outcome analysis according to resuming anticoagulation at original discharge

13 Results : 90-Day outcomes: recurrent GIB  During the 90-day follow-up period, 27 patients (14%) were readmitted with recurrent GIB with a median time to readmission of 13 days  22 patients who resumed anticoagulation  5 patients who had interruption or cessation of anticoagulation  Anticoagulation continuation at discharge was not significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB at 90 days Resuming anticoagulation at hospital discharge was associated with a higher rate of readmissions because of GIB within 90days, although this result did not reach statistical significance

14 Results : 90-Day outcomes: recurrent GIB only 36% had a drop in hgb greater than 1 g/dL compared with their discharge hgb levels only 5 (19%) patients required endoscopic, radiographic, or surgical intervention to manage their recurrent GIB

15 Results : 90-Day outcomes: mortality  During the 90-day follow-up period, 16 (8%) patients died within 90 days of discharge  All deaths in the cohort were unrelated to recurrent GIB or thrombotic events  There was no significant difference in mortality at 90 days for patients who had their anticoagulation resumed at hospital discharge

16 Conclusion  Restarting anticoagulation at discharge after GIB was associated with fewer thromboembolic events without a significantly increased risk of recurrent GIB at 90 days  The benefits of continuing anticoagulation at discharge may outweigh the risks of recurrent GIB  These data support the recommendation that anticoagulation should be continued after an episode of GIB whenever possible


Download ppt "The Risks of Thromboembolism Vs. Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Interruption of Systemic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Inpatients With Gastrointestinal."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google