Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGinger Anis Poole Modified over 8 years ago
1
R3 민준기 Pf. 이창균
2
Introduction 1978 – Clostridium difficile major cause of diarrhea – Pseudomembranous colitis associated with the use of antimicrobial agents 1996 ~ 2003 – US National Hospital Discharge Survey statistics – C. difficile infection(CDI) prevalence rate 0.61 / 1,000 2008 – US acute care facilities – CDI prevalence rate of 13.1 / 1,000
3
Recurrent CDI Difficult and increasingly common challenges associated with CDI Complicates management of IBD – additional independent risk factor for CDI Risk factors for recurrence – Older age – antibiotic use – renal insufficiency, immune deficiency – antacid medications
4
Fecal microbiota transplantation(FMT) = Fecal bacteriotherapy Fastest reconstitution of a normal composition of colon microbial communities. Prompt and sustained engraftment of donor fecal bacteria in a patient with recurrent CDI
5
Procedure is rarely performed!! Lack of wider practice of FMT (Practical barrier) – Lack of reimbursement for donor screening – Difficulty in material preparation – Aesthetic concerns – Pharmaceutical industry has shown little interest Large part due to the wide availability of donor material complex composition
6
To overcome some of the associated challenges Patient-identified individual donors rigorously screened “ universal ” volunteer donors Fresh donor fecal materials a more standardized laboratory protocol done using frozen fecal extracts
7
Method
8
Patients 43 patients who received FMT for recurrent CDI at the University of Minnesota Fairview Medical Center Inclusion criteria for FMT – history of symptomatic, toxin-positive, infection by C. difficile – at least two documented subsequent recurrences despite use of standard antibiotic therapy. – At least one failed antibiotic regimen a minimum of a 6-week course of tapered or pulsed vancomycin dosage at least a 1-month vancomycin course followed by a minimum of 2-week rifaximin
9
Donor identification and screening Patient-identified individual donors – Mothers (n=2) – Daughter (n=1) – Sons (n=3) – Wife (n=1) – Husband (n=1) – Friends (n=2) – Donors underwent serologic testing for HIV and Hepatitis B and C Stool testing C. difficile toxin B examination for ova and parasites Giardia and Cryptosporidium antigens. Exclusion Criteria gastrointestinal comorbidities use of antibiotics within 3 months metabolic syndrome Autoimmunity allergic diseases
10
Donor identification and screening volunteer donors Advantages of this change – removing the burden of donor identification from the patient – improving the efficiency and costs related to donor screening – more consistent supply of donor fecal microbiota – Ability to impose extensive and stringent exclusion criteria on donor selection
11
Donor material preparation
12
Material obtained from volunteer donors Blendered slurry sieves(0.25mm) centrifuges(6000G) for 15min resuspended – administered immediately – amended with glycerol frozen (-80 ℃ ) for 1- 8wks thawing 2-4hrs before procedure Fecal material extract – Nearly orderless – Reduced viscosity & color & texture – effortless loading without risk of clotting
13
Follow up Formally followed in clinic 1 – 2 months after the procedure Clearance of CDI – resolution of diarrhea – negative stool testing for C. difficile at 2 months following FMT
14
Statistical analysis Non-categorical data – unpaired Student’s t -test Categorical data – Fisher’s exact test
15
Results
16
Demographics CD 6 UC 4 lymphocytic colitis 4
17
Response to treatment
18
Conclusion
19
Discussion(Limitations ) It was not a rigorous clinical trial designed to test efficacy of a particular FMT methodology vs. another – Can not conclude from this experience alone that the fresh and frozen preparations are equivalent.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.