Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Primary focus: Scaling properties of flow & Jet quenching.

Published byLionel Harrington Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Primary focus: Scaling properties of flow & Jet quenching."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Primary focus: Scaling properties of flow & Jet quenching

2 Flow & Jet quenching are important probes of the QGP!  This implies very specific scaling properties for flow and jet suppression (respectively), which can be tested experimentally  Scaling validation provide important insights, as well as straightforward probes of transport coefficients Scaling validation provide important insights, as well as straightforward probes of transport coefficients RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University pT < 3 - 4 GeV/c Flow pT > 8 -10 GeV/c Jet suppression 2 Eccentricity driven & acoustic 3-4 < pT < 8-10 GeV/c Path length (L & ∆L) driven More suppression Less suppression Transition Region Flow and Jet suppression are linked to Geometry & the interactions in the QGP

3 3 Geometric Quantities for scaling A B  Geometric fluctuations included  Geometric quantities constrained by multiplicity density. Phys. Rev. C 81, 061901(R) (2010) arXiv:1203.3605 σ x & σ y  RMS widths of density distribution RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

4 The Flow Probe 4 Initial Geometry characterized by many shape harmonics (ε n )  drive v n Acoustic viscous modulation of v n Staig & Shuryak arXiv:1008.3139 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Scaling expectations Note that v n is related to v 2 Particle Distribution

5 5 High precision double differential Measurements for Pb+Pb are pervasive  Do they scale? RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University v n (ψ n ) Measurements - ATLAS Note v n increase from central to peripheral collisions ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 ) & ATLAS-CONF-2011-074

6 6 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University v n (ψ n ) Measurements - LHC Double differential Measurements for p+Pb are pervasive  Do they scale? Recent p+Pb measurements ATLAS Data - arXiv:1212.5198. ALICE Data - arXiv:1212.2001 Note increase of v 2 (or s 2 ) from peripheral to central collisions

7 7 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – n 2 Characteristic n 2 viscous damping validated Characteristic 1/(p T ) α dependence of extracted β values validated Constraint for η/s and δf ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 ) arXiv:1301.0165

8 8 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Characteristic (n 2 – 4) viscous damping validated Characteristic 1/(p T ) α dependence of β validated Constraint for η/s Acoustic Scaling - Ratios arXiv:1301.0165

9 9 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Fits performed for each centrality Acoustic Scaling - Ratios arXiv:1301.0165

10 10 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling - Ratios The expected relation between v n and v 2 is validated arXiv:1105.3782

11 11 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University For partonic flow, quark number scaling expected  single curve for identified particle species v n Flow is partonic & Acoustic? Note species dependence for all v n arXiv:1211.4009

12 KE T & scaling validated for v n  Partonic flow 12 v n PID scaling Flow is partonic & acoustic RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University arXiv:1211.4009 J.Phys. G38 (2011) 124048

13 13 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R Specific dependence dictated by sound attenuation Centrality 5-70% ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 )

14 14 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R CMS Data - JHEP 1108,141 (2011)

15 15 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R slope  β constraint STAR Data - PhysRevC.81.044902

16 16 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 ) Note slope difference

17 17 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Increase of s 2 (v 2 ) with centrality for p+Pb collisions is to be expected If the mechanism is similar!  Effects of system size (R) dominates Acoustic Scaling – 1/R v 2 increases with centrality ATLAS Data - arXiv:1212.5198. e 2 decreases with centrality

18 18 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R Slope difference encodes viscous coefficient difference Compare system size @ RHIC Viscous coefficient larger for more dilute system

19 19 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R

20 20 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Jet suppression Probe Suppression (∆L) – pp yield unnecessary Jet suppression drives R AA & azimuthal anisotropy with specific scaling properties Suppression (L), Phys.Lett.B519:199-206,2001 For Radiative Energy loss: Modified jet More suppression Less suppression Fixed Geometry Path length (related to collision centrality)

21 R AA Measurements - CMS Specific p T and centrality dependencies – Do they scale? 21 Eur. Phys. J. C (2012) 72:1945 arXiv:1202.2554 Centrality dependence p T dependence RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

22 L scaling of Jet Quenching - LHC R AA scales with L, slopes (S L ) encodes info on α s and q Compatible with the dominance of radiative energy loss 22 arXiv:1202.5537 ˆ, Phys.Lett.B519:199-206,2001 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

23 23 Phys.Rev.C80:051901,2009 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University L scaling of Jet Quenching - RHIC R AA scales with L, slopes (S L ) encodes info on α s and q Compatible with the dominance of radiative energy loss ˆ

24 R AA scales as 1/√p T ; slopes (S pT ) encode info on α s and q L and 1/√p T scaling  single universal curve Compatible with the dominance of radiative energy loss 24 arXiv:1202.5537 p T scaling of Jet Quenching ˆ, Phys.Lett.B519:199-206,2001 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

25 Consistent obtained 25 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University q LHC ˆ Heavy quark suppression

26 Specific p T and centrality dependencies – Do they scale? 26 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University High-pT v 2 measurements - PHENIX p T dependence Centrality dependence

27 High-pT v 2 measurements - CMS Specific p T and centrality dependencies – Do they scale? 27 arXiv:1204.1850 p T dependence Centrality dependence RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

28 28 High-pT v 2 scaling - LHC v 2 follows the p T dependence observed for jet quenching Note the expected inversion of the 1/√p T dependence arXiv:1203.3605 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

29 29 ∆L Scaling of high-pT v 2 – LHC & RHIC Combined ∆L and 1/√p T scaling  single universal curve for v 2 arXiv:1203.3605 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

30 30 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University ∆L Scaling of high-pT v 2 - RHIC Combined ∆L and 1/√p T scaling  single universal curve for v 2  Constraint for ε n

31 31 Jet v 2 scaling - LHC v 2 for reconstructed Jets follows the p T dependence for jet quenching Similar magnitude and trend for Jet and hadron v 2 after scaling RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University (z ~.62) ATLAS

32 32 Jet suppression from high-pT v 2 Jet suppression obtained directly from pT dependence of v 2 arXiv:1203.3605 R v2 scales as 1/√p T, slopes encodes info on α s and q ˆ RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

33 33 Extracted stopping power Phys.Rev.C80:051901,2009  obtained from high-pT v 2 and R AA [same α s ]  similar  - medium produced in LHC collisions less opaque! arXiv:1202.5537arXiv:1203.3605 Conclusion similar to those of Liao, Betz, Horowitz,  Stronger coupling near T c ? q RHIC > q LHC ˆ q LHC ˆ RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

34 Robust scaling observed for both Flow and Jet Quenching They lend profound mechanistic insights, as well as New constraints for estimates of the transport and thermodynamic coefficients! 34  R AA and high-pT azimuthal anisotropy stem from the same energy loss mechanism  Energy loss is dominantly radiative  R AA and anisotropy measurements give consistent estimates for  R AA and anisotropy measurements give consistent estimates for  R AA for D’s give consistent estimates for  R AA for D’s give consistent estimates for  The QGP created in LHC collisions is less opaque than that produced at RHIC – Note density increase from RHIC to LHC RHIC to LHC  Flow is acoustic Flow is pressure driven Obeys the dispersion relation for sound propagation clear system size dependence  Flow is partonic exhibits scaling  Constraints for: ε, β, and δf η/s @ RHIC (~ 1/4π) η/s @ LHC a bit larger than at RHIC What do we learn? Summary RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

35 End 35 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University

36 36 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Centrality – 5-70% Acoustic Scaling – 1/R ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 )

37 37 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Acoustic Scaling – 1/R  Eccentricity change alone is not sufficient To account for N part dependence of v 2 In light & heavy systems STAR Data - PhysRevC.81.044902 ATLAS data - Phys. Rev. C86, 014907 (2012 )

38 38 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Larger Slope for LHC  Viscosity larger @ LHC than @ RHIC Acoustic Scaling – 1/R p T dependence of slope  δf constraint Compare RHIC & LHC

Download ppt "1 RIKEN Workshop, April 15-17. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Primary focus: Scaling properties of flow & Jet quenching."

Similar presentations

Azimuthal Correlation Studies Via Correlation Functions and Cumulants N. N. Ajitanand Nuclear Chemistry, SUNY, Stony Brook.

Azimuthal Correlation Studies Via Correlation Functions and Cumulants N. N. Ajitanand Nuclear Chemistry, SUNY, Stony Brook.
Multi-Particle Azimuthal Correlations at RHIC !! Roy A. Lacey USB - Chem (SUNY Stony Brook ) What do they tell us about Possible Quenching?

Multi-Particle Azimuthal Correlations at RHIC !! Roy A. Lacey USB - Chem (SUNY Stony Brook ) What do they tell us about Possible Quenching?
What do we Learn From Azimuthal Correlation Measurements in PHENIX Roy. A. Lacey Nuclear Chemistry, SUNY, Stony Brook.

What do we Learn From Azimuthal Correlation Measurements in PHENIX Roy. A. Lacey Nuclear Chemistry, SUNY, Stony Brook.
1Erice 2012, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University.

1Erice 2012, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,
Peter Christiansen (Lund University) for the ALICE Collaboration.

Peter Christiansen (Lund University) for the ALICE Collaboration.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC Energies 1 Nuclear Chemistry Group, SUNY Stony Brook,

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC Energies 1 Nuclear Chemistry Group, SUNY Stony Brook,
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.

ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.

A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.
Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.

Centrality-dependent pt spectra of Direct photons at RHIC F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook; 24 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, April 5-12, 2008 1 Roy A. Lacey Prospects for locating the QCD Critical End Point.

Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook; 24 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, April 5-12, Roy A. Lacey Prospects for locating the QCD Critical End Point.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook The PHENIX Flow Data: Current Status Justin Frantz (for T.Todoroki) Ohio University WWND 15 Keystone, CO 1 (Filling in For Takahito.

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook The PHENIX Flow Data: Current Status Justin Frantz (for T.Todoroki) Ohio University WWND 15 Keystone, CO 1 (Filling in For Takahito.
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct. 15 2009 for HAWAII2009 2009/10/15HAWAII 20091.

JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
1Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University, QM2014 Outline: I.Motivation.  Interest and observables II.Available data and scaling  Demonstration of scaling.

1Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University, QM2014 Outline: I.Motivation.  Interest and observables II.Available data and scaling  Demonstration of scaling.
1Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University, RBRC Workshop, Feb-24-2015 Outline  Introduction Phase Diagram  Search strategy for the CEP Guiding principles.

1Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University, RBRC Workshop, Feb Outline  Introduction Phase Diagram  Search strategy for the CEP Guiding principles.
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook; EDT-HIC, McGill, Montreal, Canada, July 16-19, 2007 1 Roy A. Lacey New Prospects for locating the Critical End Point (CEP) in.

Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook; EDT-HIC, McGill, Montreal, Canada, July 16-19, Roy A. Lacey New Prospects for locating the Critical End Point (CEP) in.
M. Issah QM04 1 Azimuthal Anisotropy Measurements in PHENIX via Cumulants of Multi-particle Azimuthal Correlations Michael Issah (SUNY Stony Brook ) for.

M. Issah QM04 1 Azimuthal Anisotropy Measurements in PHENIX via Cumulants of Multi-particle Azimuthal Correlations Michael Issah (SUNY Stony Brook ) for.
Jet quenching and direct photon production F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano 平野哲文 University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner University.

Jet quenching and direct photon production F.M. Liu 刘复明 Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano 平野哲文 University of Tokyo, Japan K.Werner University.
13/Aug/2013, Fluc. & Corr. Workshop, Chengdu, China ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Flow and Jet-correlation ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Flow originated.

13/Aug/2013, Fluc. & Corr. Workshop, Chengdu, China ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Flow and Jet-correlation ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Flow originated.
Detail study of the medium created in Au+Au collisions with high p T probes by the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Detail study of the medium created in Au+Au collisions with high p T probes by the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google