1. “Culturally Responsive Practices, Inclusive Practices and Family Engagement” Monica Ballay, M.Ed. mballay@lsu.edumballay@lsu.edu Quality Indicators:

3. Have you used the Benchmark of Quantity Tool for PBIS? Yes or No 3

4. Quality Indicators Tool One tool per focus area Self-assessment completed by the LEAs and Schools Identifies Achievement Identifies Areas of need Similar to PBIS benchmarks of quality

5. Big Picture - Timeline LaSIG 2 – Created and Utilized Family Engagement Survey (School, Student, Family) LaSPDG – Year 1 – baseline data – Created and used Quality Indicators at LEA Level (Fall ‘12 ) and School Level (Spring ‘13) LaSPDG – Year 2 - compare data – Collected yr 2 QI Data at LEA & School levels – Created Performance Profile – Fall ’13 – Used Performance Profile – Jan ‘14

6. 3 Focus Areas (FE, IP, CRP) Domains Quality Indicator Statements

7. Do you use a tool similar to our QI Tool with your LEAs? Yes or No 7

8. Do you use a tool similar to our QI Tool with your Schools? Yes or No 8

9. Design of Quality Indicators Tool Family Engagement – 4 Domains 1) Communication 2) Family Support 3) Decision Making 4) Partnership

12. Quality Indicators Online Electronic reporting built into website www.laspdg.orgwww.laspdg.org Completed Annually Output Reports can be view instantaneously By LEA By All Schools By Individual Schools Data used to support PD needs of LEA and School

13. LEA Summary Report

14. LEA Focus Area Report - Multiyear

15. LEA Focus Area Chart - Multiyear

16. LEA Summary by Focus Areas - Multiyear

17. LEA Next Steps QI data is one of many data points used in determining need of each LEA QI data helps identify success and areas that need support by LEA and among LEAs QI data used to track longitudinal changes over time by focus area broken into domains & indicators QI data supports action plan

18. School Level QI Process to complete School Level Quality Indicators: School Leadership Team will meet and discuss quality indicators for each focus area. The School Leadership Team will come to a consensus and select either “Not In Place”, “Partially In Place” or “In Place” for each indicator. If “Not In Place” or “Partially In Place” use space below each domain to address the indicator(s).

21. Input Screen for QI Completion of School QI Complete paper and/or electronic by school, decision made by LEA

22. School QI Output Report by LEA

23. School QI Report Summary – All Schools Family Engagement 2012-2013

24. School QI Report Summary – Individual School Family Engagement 2012-2013

25. School Next Steps QI data is one of many data points used in determining need of each school and among schools in LEA QI data helps identify success and areas that need support by schools and among schools in LEA QI data used to track longitudinal changes over time by focus area broken into domains & indicators QI data supports action plan

26. Project Summary by Focus Area QI Data: 1 data point used to design tiered level of support by project

27. Project Summary by Focus Area Domain

28. Next Step after QI: Practice Profile -Fidelity Tool Check -Onsite tool to measure the degree in which the quality indicators are being implemented -Completed in 20% of LEA in January 2014 -Goal build capacity at LEA level for substantiality - LEA will use Practice Profile with School - Project staff will model and teach process to LEA *Similar to SET in PBIS

29. LEA Practice Profile January 2014

35. The contents of this PowerPoint presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A110003. However those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. www.laspdg.org