Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Genes Within Populations Chapter 20 2 Darwin’s Theory.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Genes Within Populations Chapter 20 2 Darwin’s Theory."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 1 Genes Within Populations Chapter 20

3 2 Darwin’s Theory

4 22 years old! Darwin’s Theory

5 (a) Cactus eater. The long, sharp beak of the cactus ground finch (Geospiza scandens) helps it tear and eat cactus flowers and pulp. (c) Seed eater. The large ground finch (Geospiza magnirostris) has a large beak adapted for cracking seeds that fall from plants to the ground. (b) Insect eater. The green warbler finch (Certhidea olivacea) uses its narrow, pointed beak to grasp insects. Darwin’s Theory

6 Warbler finch Woodpecker finch Small insectivorous tree finch Large insectivorous tree finch Vegetarian tree finch Cactus finch Sharp-beaked finch Small ground finch Medium ground finch Large ground finch Insect eaters Bud eater Seed eaters Cactus eater Warbler finch Tree finches Ground finches Ancestral species Descendant species Darwin’s Theory

7 Correlation of species to food source Adaptive radiation Rapid speciation: new species filling niches because they inherited successful adaptations Seed eaters Flower eaters Insect eaters

8 7 Darwin (1859) descent with modification (current sp. descended from the same ancestral sp.) Genetic Variation and Evolution

9 8 Evolution (1930s) all changes that have transformed life through time  sp. accumulate difference  descendants differ from their ancestors  new sp. arise from existing ones Genetic Variation and Evolution

10 9 Natural selection mechanism of evolution  ind. have sp. inherited characteristics  some prod. more surviving offspring  pop. begins to include more ind. with these sp. characteristics  pop. evolves and is better adapted to its env. Natural Selection

11 10

12 11

13 12 Godfrey H. Hardy: English mathematician Hardy-Weinberg Principle Wilhelm Weinberg: German physician HOW DO WE KNOW IF EV. IS OCCURING?

14 13 Hardy-Weinberg Principle Hypothetical situation: nonevolving pop. Serves as null hypothesis Orig. proportions of the genotypes in a pop will remain constant from gen. to gen.

15 14 1.No mutation takes place 2.No genes are transferred to or from other sources (gene flow) 3.Random mating is occurring 4.The population size is very large (prevents genetic drift) 5.No selection occurs Hardy-Weinberg Principle

16 15 Calculate genotype frequencies with a binomial expansion (p+q) 2 = p 2 + 2pq + q 2 p 2 = individuals homozygous for 1 st allele 2pq = individuals heterozygous for both alleles q 2 = individuals homozygous for 2 nd allele because there are only 2 alleles: p + q must always = 1 Hardy-Weinberg Principle

17 16 Hardy-Weinberg Principle

18 17 Hardy-Weinberg eq. is used to predict allelic freq. in subsequent gen. Hardy-Weinberg Principle

19 18 A pop. not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium indicates that 1 or more of the 5 ev. agents are operating in a pop.

20 19 Agents of Evolutionary Change 1.Mutation change in a cell’s DNA –ultimate source of genetic variation –rates are generally so low they have little effect on Hardy-Weinberg proportions of common alleles

21 20

22 21 Agents of Evolutionary Change 2.Gene flow movement of alleles from one population to another –powerful agent of change –can homogenize alleles btwn. pop.

23 22

24 23 Agents of Evolutionary Change 3.Nonrandom Mating mating with sp. genotypes –shifts genotype freq. –assortative mating doesn’t change freq. of ind. alleles; increases proportion of homozygous ind. –disassortative mating phenotypically diff. ind. mate; produces excess of heterozygotes

25 24 Assortative Disassortative

26 25 Genetic Drift 4.Genetic drift random fluctuation in allele freq. over time by chance –important in small populations founder effect - few ind. found new pop. (small allelic pool)

27 26 Plolydactyly in Amish Pop.

28 27 Genetic Drift bottleneck effect - drastic reduction in pop. and gene pool size (ex: endangered sp.)

29 28

30 29 Selection 5.Selection –Two types: 1)Artificial selection: a breeder selects for desired characteristics

31 30 Selection 2)Natural selection env. cond. determine which ind. in a pop. prod. most offspring only agent that produces adaptive change –3 conditions: 1.variation must exist among ind. in a pop. 2.variation among ind. must result in diff. # of offspring surviving 3.variation must be genetically inherited

32 31 Pocket mice from the Tularosa Basin Selection to Avoid Predators

33 32 Selection to Match Climatic Conditions

34 33 Selection for Antibiotic Resistance

35 34 Selection for Pesticide Resistance

36 35 Fitness and Its Measurement Fitness phenotype with greater fitness usually increases in freq. –combination of: survival: how long does an organism live mating success: how often it mates # of offspring/mating that survive

37 36 Body size and egg-laying in water striders Fitness and its Measurement

38 37 Interactions Among Evolutionary Forces Mutation and genetic drift may counter selection The magnitude of drift is inversely related to population size

39 38 Gene flow may promote or constrain evolutionary change –Spread a beneficial mutation –Impede adaptation by continual flow of inferior alleles from other populations Extent to which gene flow can hinder the effects of natural selection depends on the relative strengths of gene flow –High in birds & wind-pollinated plants –Low in sedentary species Interactions Among Evolutionary Forces

40 39 Degree of copper tolerance Interactions Among Evolutionary Forces

41 40 Maintenance of Variation Frequency-dependent selection depends on how freq. or infreq. a phenotype occurs in a pop. –Neg. freq.-dependent selection rare phenotypes are favored

42 41 Maintenance of Variation –Positive freq.-dependent selection: common phenotypes are favored

43 42 Oscillating selection selection favors 1 phenotype at 1 time, and a diff. phenotype another time –env. changes cause –Ex: Galápagos Islands finches wet conditions favor big bills dry conditions favor small bills Maintenance of Variation

44 43 Maintenance of Variation

45 44 Heterozygote advantage –heterozygotes may exhibit greater fitness than homozygotes –keep deleterious alleles in a population –Example: Sickle cell anemia homo. rec. : severe anemics, no malaria homo. dom.: no anemia, malaria hetero.: no anemia, no malaria Maintenance of Variation

46 45 Maintenance of Variation Frequency of sickle cell allele

47 46 Disruptive selection: acts to eliminate intermediate types Maintenance of Variation

48 47 ex: large and small beaks in black-bellied seedcracker finch of west Africa Maintenance of Variation

49 48 Directional selection: acts to eliminate 1 extreme from an array of phenotypes Maintenance of Variation

50 49 ex: directional selection for negative phototropism in Drosophila Maintenance of Variation

51 50 Stabilizing selection: acts to eliminate both extremes Maintenance of Variation

52 51 ex: stabilizing selection for birth weight in humans Maintenance of Variation

53 52 Experimental Studies of Natural Selection In some cases, evolutionary change can occur rapidly Evolutionary studies can be devised to test evolutionary hypotheses Guppy studies (Poecilia reticulata) in the lab and field –Populations above the waterfalls: low predation –Populations below the waterfalls: high predation

54 53 High predation environment - Males exhibit drab coloration and tend to be relatively small and reproduce at a younger age. Low predation environment - Males display bright coloration, a larger number of spots, and tend to be more successful at defending territories. Experimental Studies

55 54 The evolution of protective coloration in guppies Experimental Studies

56 55 The laboratory experiment –10 large pools –2000 guppies –4 pools with pike cichlids (predator) –4 pools with killifish (nonpredator) –2 pools as control (no other fish added) –10 generations Experimental Studies

57 56 The field experiment –Removed guppies from below the waterfalls (high predation) –Placed guppies in pools above the falls –10 generations later, transplanted populations evolved the traits characteristic of low-predation guppies Experimental Studies

58 57 Evolutionary change in spot number Experimental Studies

59 58 The Limits of Selection Genes have multiple effects –Pleiotropy: sets limits on how much a phenotype can be altered Evolution requires genetic variation –Thoroughbred horse speed –Compound eyes of insects: same genes affect both eyes –Control of ommatidia number in left and right eye

60 59 Selection for increased speed in racehorses is no longer effective Experimental Studies

61 60 Phenotypic variation in insect ommatidia Experimental Studies


Download ppt "1 Genes Within Populations Chapter 20 2 Darwin’s Theory."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google