Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPaulina Lorraine McGee Modified over 8 years ago
1
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid Maglev System Innovative traintechnology
2
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Titel Comparison of Systems Railroad / Maglev Wheel-on-railElectromagnetic Levitation Propulsion Support Propulsion Guidance
3
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 System Components Stator Pack Support Magnet Linear Generator Guidance Magnet Eddy Current Brake Guidance Rail Electromagnetic Levitation
4
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Linear Motor
5
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Propulsion Principle Magnetic Traveling Field
6
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Longstator Propulsion Switching Motor Section Switched Off Activated Motor Section Switched Off Energy Supply
7
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Comparison Propulsion Systems Gradient (max. 4%) Gradient (max. 10%) Transrapid (Track-mounted drive) Railroad (Vehicle-mounted drive)
8
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid/ICE Acceleration distance to 300 km/h (185 mph)
9
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 km/h 0 100 200 300 400 500 050100150200250300 s 61,1 s 1,7 km 97,1 s 4,2 km 147,5 s 9,1 km 256,3 s 22,7 km Transrapid Acceleration of a 6-section vehicle
10
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 At-grade guideway Typ III Elevated guideway Typ II Elevated guideway Type I 49,536 m 1,25-3,5 m 25 m Guideway Types
11
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Guideway Bending Switch Straight Direction Turn-out Direction 150 m 3,60 m
12
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid 08
13
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Trainset Configurations Airport Link: 2 Sections with up to 184 Seats Long distance: Up to 10 Sections with 1172 Seats
14
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Cargo Vehicle
15
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Safety
16
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Land Consumption (m 2 /m) 14 12 2 ICE TR at grade TR elevated
17
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid Collocation with highways TR Standard 26.4.2001
18
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Specific Energy Consumption cannot be achieved by ICE 3 200 km/h 125 mph 300 km/h 185 mph 400 km/h 250 mph Wh/seat-km (under identical conditions) Transrapid ICE
19
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Specific CO 2 Emissions Values in grams per seat-km Car 60 400 km/h 250 mph Transrapid 33 Short-haul Flight 190 300 km/h 185 mph Transrapid 23 30 ICE
20
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Noise Emission 89 92 90 80 85 82 73 80 Pass-by Level in dB(A) at a Distance of 25 m (82 ft) Suburban Train Transrapid 07 ICE 1+2 TGV-A Transrapid 07 ICE 1+2 TGV-A Transrapid 07 80 km/h 50 mph 200 km/h 125 mph 300 km/h 185 mph 400 km/h 250 mph
21
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Magnetic Field Strength Earth‘s Magnetic Field TransrapidColor TVHair Dryer Electric Stove in µTesla
22
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Track Investment Costs ICE/Transrapid Long Distance Application (in million € per double track km) Mannheim Stuttgart Hannover Würzburg Hannover Berlin Cologne Frankfurt Berlin Hamburg ICE Transrapid New route including track infrastructure, operation/maintenance facilities, without trains and station New route including guideway infrastructure, operation/maintenance facilities, without vehicles and stations (Berlin-Hamburg Project planning) level, few tunnels, 94 mi, Price level 1997 low-mountains, many tunnels, 205 mi, Price level 1988 low-mountains many tunnels, 62 mi, Price level 1988 low-mountains many tunnels, 118 mi, Price level 1998 level, few tunnels, 181 mi, Price level 1998
23
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Overall System Maintenance Costs Long Distance Application Operating Speed: ICE = 250 km/h (155 mph) Transrapid (TR) = 450 km/h (280 mph) VehicleGuidewayOverall System 100% 41% 100% 29% 100% 34% Eurocent per seat-km (under identical conditions)
24
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Emsland Test Facility TVE North Loop Guideway Length: 31.5 km / 19.5 miles South Loop At-grade Guideway Observation Point High-speed Section (400-450 km/h) Switch At-grade Guideway Visitor / Test Center Switch
25
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Shanghai Airport Link
26
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Shanghai Airport Link Route
27
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Shanghai Airport Link Project Data Route Length30 km double track Link to maintenance facilities3 km single track Stations2 Number of vehicles in 2003 3 vehicles each with 5 sections Traffic Volume in 200510 million passengers in 201020 million passengers in 202033 million passengers Travel speed (max.)430 km/h Trip time8 minutes Headway10 minutes (option: 5 minutes) Daily operation18 hours
28
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid project Munich
29
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Munich Airport Link Olympiapark Ismaning Oberschleißheim Unterschleißheim Eching Neufahrn b. Fsg. Ostbahnhof AB.-Dreieck Feldmoching AB.-Dreieck Feldmoching Possible tunnel Airport Western Route Messe Main Station
30
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Munich Airport Link Project Data Number of vehicles Sections / Vehicle Seats per vehicle including seats Stations Traffic Volume Travel speed (average speed) Trip Time Train schedule Munich Airport – Central Station 5 3 148 7.86 million passengers/year 2 350 km/h / 218 mph (220 km/h / 137 mph) 10 minutes every 10 minutes
31
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Route length in collocation with federal highways in collocation with roads/railways Track length Elevated (> 6m above GOK*) in Hochlage (> 2m über GOK*) in Niveaulage (1,45 m über GOK*) davon im Tunnel * GOK = Gelände Oberkante Munich Airport – Central Station 37.4 km / 23.2 miles 18.7 km / 11.6 miles (50%) 2.9 km / 1.8 miles (8%) 37.4 km / 23.2 miles 12.7 km / 7.9 miles (34 %) 5.25 km / 3.3 miles (14%) 19.45 km / 12.1 miles (52%) 7.2 km / 4.5 miles (19%) Munich Airport Link Track Data
32
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Pittsburgh Greensburg Magport Monroeville Magport Station Square Magport North Shore Magport Pittsburgh International Airport Magport Monongahela Pittsburgh International Airport to Greensburg Route length86.9 km / 54 milesVehicles8 (3 sections each) Stations5 Invest cost$ 3.5 billion Trip time35 minutes Pennsylvania Project Route Alternatives
33
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Washington D.C. Baltimore 795 32 295 95 Baltimore to Washington D.C. Route length62.8 km / 39 miles Stations3 Trip time18.5 minutes Vehicles7 (3 sections each) Invest cost$ 3.7 billion Baltimore-Washington Project Route Alternatives
34
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 From Las Vegas to Primm Route length 56 km / 35 miles Stations 2 Trip time11 minutes Vehicles3 (8 sections each) Investment cost$ 1.3 billion Transrapid Las Vegas California Nevada Barstow Primm Los Angeles Las Vegas
35
TRI Standard 2003-11-11 Transrapid Project Netherlands Groningen Drachten Heerenveen Emmeloord Lelystad Almere Amsterdam Schipol International Airport NETHERLANDS NORTH SEA Amsterdam Schipol – Groningen (Zuiderzeelijn) Route length 186 km / 116 miles Stations 8 Trip time 59 minutes
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.