Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
http://ifomis.org 1 Aristotle 2005
2
http://ifomis.org 2 beta version
3
http://ifomis.org 3 Organism DNA Protein Organelle Cell Tissue Organ 10 -5 m 10 -1 m 10 -9 m
4
http://ifomis.org 4 FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS proteomics, reactomics, metabonomics, phenomics, behaviouromics, toxicopharmacogenomics
5
http://ifomis.org 5 The incompatibilities between different scientific cultures and terminologies immunology genetics cell biology
6
http://ifomis.org 6 how can we overcome the incompatibilities which become apparent when data from distinct sources are combined?
7
http://ifomis.org 7 Metaphysically intriguing answer: “Ontology”
8
http://ifomis.org 8 Google hits (as of yesterday) ontology + Heidegger 58K ontology + Aristotle 77K ontology + philosophy327K ontology + engineering335K ontology + software 468K ontology + database 594K ontology + information systems 702K
9
http://ifomis.org 9 Ontology = building software artefacts standardized classification systems so that data from one source can be expressed in a language which makes it compatible with data from every other source
10
http://ifomis.org 10 IFOMIS Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science
11
http://ifomis.org 11 A Linnaean Species Hierarchy
12
http://ifomis.org 12 (Small) Disease Hierarchy
13
http://ifomis.org 13 Combining hierarchies Organisms Diseases
14
http://ifomis.org 14 via Dependence Relations Organisms Diseases
15
http://ifomis.org 15 A Window on Reality
16
http://ifomis.org 16 Organisms Diseases A Window on Reality
17
http://ifomis.org 17 A Window on Reality
18
http://ifomis.org 18 Gene Ontology databases
19
http://ifomis.org 19 Cancer MD/Saliva databases www.saliva.bme.ucla.edu/ Informatics.htm
20
http://ifomis.org 20 New golden age of classification 30,000 genes in human 200,000 proteins 100s of cell types 100,000s of disease types 1,000,000s of biochemical pathways (including disease pathways) … legacy of Human Genome Project
21
http://ifomis.org 21
22
http://ifomis.org 22 Inherence Relations Substances Accidents
23
http://ifomis.org 23 From Species to Genera canary animal bird
24
http://ifomis.org 24 From Species to Genera animal bird canary can sing is yellow has wings can fly has feathers has skin moves eats breathes species-genus hierarchy as inference machine
25
http://ifomis.org 25 From Species to Genera animal bird canary can sing is yellow has wings can fly has feathers has skin moves eats breathes fish has fins can swim has gills
26
http://ifomis.org 26 siamese mammal cat organism substance species, genera animal instances frog
27
http://ifomis.org 27 siamese mammal cat organism substance types animal tokens frog
28
http://ifomis.org 28 animal bird canary From Species to Genera can sing is yellow has skin moves eats breathes has wings can fly has feathers species-genus hierarchy as inference machine X
29
http://ifomis.org 29 Why are species-genus hierarchies good ways to represent our reasoning? 1. They capture the natural ways we think (Kantianism)... species are concepts 2. They capture the way the world is (Aristotelian realism)
30
http://ifomis.org 30 genus Species-genus trees can be represented also as map-like partitions
31
http://ifomis.org 31 From Species to Genera canary animal bird
32
http://ifomis.org 32 From Species to Genera animal bird canary
33
http://ifomis.org 33 Species Genera as Tree canary animal bird fish ostrich
34
http://ifomis.org 34 Species-Genera as Map/Partition animal bird canary ostrich fish canary
35
http://ifomis.org 35 Tree and Map/Partition
36
http://ifomis.org 36 If Aristotelian realism is right, then such partitions are transparent to the reality beyond
37
http://ifomis.org 37 A Window on Reality
38
http://ifomis.org 38
39
http://ifomis.org 39 Coarse-grained Partition
40
http://ifomis.org 40 Fine-Grained Partition
41
http://ifomis.org 41 Artist’s Grid
42
http://ifomis.org 42 Partitions often come with a labelling and an address system
43
http://ifomis.org 43 Periodic Table Die periodische Tabelle der chemischen Elemente
44
http://ifomis.org 44 From Species to Genera animal bird canary can sing is yellow has wings can fly has feathers has skin moves eats breathes fish has fins can swim has gills
45
http://ifomis.org 45 From Species to Genera animal bird canary can sing is yellow has wings can fly has feathers has skin moves eats breathes fish has fins can swim has gills ostrich has long thin legs is tall can‘t fly y
46
http://ifomis.org 46 From Species to Genera animal bird canary can sing is yellow has wings can fly has feathers has skin moves eats breathes fish has fins can swim has gills ostrich has long thin legs is tall can’t fly y
47
http://ifomis.org 47 Theory of vagueness How can -based conceptualizations be transparent, if the world is shaped like this ?
48
http://ifomis.org 48 hard vs. soft categories Kantianism: we constitute/shape/create (empirical) reality in such a way as to ensure that it corresponds to our categories Aristotelianism: reality in itself is messy, but our categories fit nonetheless
49
http://ifomis.org 49 How so? because they are made up, not of crisp (hard), but of open (soft) genera and species
50
http://ifomis.org 50 that is: when we apply our categories to reality we are aware that we have to deal with an opposition... between standard or focal or prototypical instances... and non-standard or ‘fringe’ instances
51
http://ifomis.org 51 birds ostrich Natural categories have borderline cases sparrow
52
http://ifomis.org 52... they have a kernel/penumbra structure kernel of focal instances penumbra of borderline cases
53
http://ifomis.org 53 animal bird canary ostrich fish every cell in every common-sense partition is subject to this same kernel-penumbra structure:
54
http://ifomis.org 54 Prototypicality among species some species of a given genus are more typical, standard, than others canary is more typical than ostrich
55
http://ifomis.org 55 instances Some instances of a given species are more typical than others albino frog
56
http://ifomis.org 56 The entities in reality are organized into hierarchies of species and genera... and subject to prototypicality
57
http://ifomis.org 57 In addition to objects (substances), which pertain to what a thing is at all times at which it exists: cow man rock planet
58
http://ifomis.org 58 the world contains also accidents which pertain to how a thing is at some time at which it exists: red hot hungry obese diabetic
59
http://ifomis.org 59 An accident = what holds of a substance per accidens
60
http://ifomis.org 60 Accidents, too, instantiate genera and species Thus accidents, too, form trees
61
http://ifomis.org 61 quality color red scarlet R232, G54, B24
62
http://ifomis.org 62 and they are distinguished as between tokens and types (which is to say: between genera and species on the one hand,... and instances on the other)
63
http://ifomis.org 63 Accidents: Species and instances this individual accident of redness (this token redness – here, now) quality color red scarlet R232, G54, B24
64
http://ifomis.org 64 substance one substantial category John, man nine accidental categories hunger, your hunger, being hungry your sun-tan your being taller than Mary accidents
65
http://ifomis.org 65 substance place (in the Lyceum) time (yesterday) position (is sitting) possession (has shoes on) action (cuts) passion (is cut) quantity (two feet long) quality (white) relation (taller than) John accidents
66
http://ifomis.org 66 substance Substances are the bearers of accidents accidents Bearers
67
http://ifomis.org 67 substance Substances are the bearers of accidents accidents John = relations of inherence (one-sided existential dependence) Bearers hunger
68
http://ifomis.org 68 Aristotle 1.0 an ontology recognizing: substance tokens accident tokens substance types accident types + prototypicality + species-genus trees
69
http://ifomis.org 69 Aristotle’s Ontological Square SubstantialAccidental Second substance man cat ox Second accident headache sun-tan dread First substance this man this cat this ox First accident this headache this sun-tan this dread Universal Particular
70
http://ifomis.org 70 Alberti’s Grid c.1450
71
http://ifomis.org 71 Some philosophers accept only part of this ontology
72
http://ifomis.org 72 Standard Predicate Logic – F(a), R(a,b)... SubstantialAccidental Attributes F, G, R Individuals a, b, c this, that Universal Particular
73
http://ifomis.org 73 in fact however we need more than Aristotle 1.0
74
http://ifomis.org 74 Is everything in reality either a substance or an accident?
75
http://ifomis.org 75 Armchair ontology
76
http://ifomis.org 76 Positive and negative parts positive part hole (made of matter) (not made of matter)
77
http://ifomis.org 77 Shoes
78
http://ifomis.org 78 Temple at Corinth
79
http://ifomis.org 79
80
http://ifomis.org 80
81
http://ifomis.org 81
82
http://ifomis.org 82 CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
83
http://ifomis.org 83 CIRCULATORY SYSTEM (Principal Organs)
84
http://ifomis.org 84 NERVOUS SYSTEM
85
http://ifomis.org 85 Bodily Systems respiratorydigestive skeletal circulatory musculatory immune
86
http://ifomis.org 86 Bodily Systems respiratorydigestive skeletal circulatory musculatory immune
87
http://ifomis.org 87 What is a hole (conduit, cavity)?
88
http://ifomis.org 88 quid? substance quantum? quantity quale? quality ad quid? relation ubi? place quando? time in quo situ? status/context in quo habitu? habitus quid agit? action quid patitur? passion One + Nine Categories
89
http://ifomis.org 89 quid? substance quantum? quantity quale? quality ad quid? relation ubi? place quando? time in quo situ? status/context in quo habitu? habitus quid agit? action quid patitur? passion Holes are places?
90
http://ifomis.org 90 Places For Aristotle the place of a substance is the interior boundary of the surrounding body (for example the interior boundary of the surrounding water where it meets a fish’s skin) Place hereby confused with boundary And there can be no empty place
91
http://ifomis.org 91 Parts
92
http://ifomis.org 92 What is a part?
93
http://ifomis.org 93 where does a body part start ?... a limb is not a substance
94
http://ifomis.org 94 nose...and it’s not an accident, either
95
http://ifomis.org 95 nose... two kinds of boundaries
96
http://ifomis.org 96 nose fiat boundaries
97
http://ifomis.org 97 nose bona fide boundaries
98
http://ifomis.org 98 Systems respiratorydigestive skeletal circulatory musculatory immune
99
http://ifomis.org 99 quid? substance quantum? quantity quale? quality ad quid? relation ubi? place quando? time in quo situ? status/context in quo habitu? habitus quid agit? action quid patitur? passion What is a System?
100
http://ifomis.org 100 A hydraulic system
101
http://ifomis.org 101 Systems interconnect with other systems
102
http://ifomis.org 102 plus NERVOUS SYSTEM (Regulatory Links)
103
http://ifomis.org 103 bodily systems are separated from each other by fiat boundaries thus systems are not substances... and they’re not accidents either
104
http://ifomis.org 104 Systems have functions
105
http://ifomis.org 105 Systems can malfunction Ontology of disease Ontology of death
106
http://ifomis.org 106 Aristotle 4.0 an ontology of substances + accidents (1.0) + holes (conduits, cavities) + parts + fiat and bona fide boundaries + systems + functions, malfunctions
107
http://ifomis.org 107 Aristotle 2005
108
http://ifomis.org 108 Universe/Periodic Table animal bird canary ostrich fish animal biology partition of DNA space (molecular biology)
109
http://ifomis.org 109 Universe/Periodic Table animal bird canary ostrich fish both are transparent partitions of one and the same reality
110
http://ifomis.org 110 DNA Protein Organelle Cell Tissue Organ Organism 10 -5 m 10 -1 m 10 -9 m
111
http://ifomis.org 111 also systems on the molecular level
112
http://ifomis.org 112
113
http://ifomis.org 113 many transparent partitions at different levels of granularity will operate with species-genus hierarchies and with an ontology of substances (objects) and accidents (attributes, processes) and holes and parts and systems along the lines described by Aristotle 4.0
114
http://ifomis.org 114 relative hylomorphism substances and accidents reappear in the microscopic and macroscopic worlds of e.g. molecular biology and astronomy (Aristotelian ontological zooming)
115
http://ifomis.org 115 Perspectivalism Different partitions may represent cuts through the same reality which are skew to each other
116
http://ifomis.org 116 Cerebral Cortex
117
http://ifomis.org 117 Mouse Chromosome 5
118
http://ifomis.org 118 http://medix.marshall.edu/~sergeev/images/apoptosis.jpg cell molecular biology
119
http://ifomis.org 119 cell anatomy (coarse grain) http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/animals/cell/anatomy.GIF
120
http://ifomis.org 120 http://library.thinkquest.org/C004535/cell_membranes.html cell anatomy (fine grain)
121
http://ifomis.org 121 All veridical perspectives are equal Each veridical perspective (= transparent partition) captures some corresponding domain of objects
122
http://ifomis.org 122 An organism is a totality of molecules An organism is a totality of cells An organism is a single unitary substance... all of these express veridical partitions An organism is a totality of atoms
123
http://ifomis.org 123 all express partitions which are transparent, at different levels of granularity, to the same reality beyond
124
http://ifomis.org 124 A partition of a given genus
125
http://ifomis.org 125 Coarse-grained Partition what happens when a fringe instance arises ?
126
http://ifomis.org 126 Coarse-grained Partition what happens when a fringe instance arises ? Aristotle 1.0: you shrug your shoulders
127
http://ifomis.org 127 Aristotle 2005 you go out to find a finer grained partition which will recognize the phenomenon in question as prototypical
128
http://ifomis.org 128 The advance of science is not an advance away from Aristotle towards something better. It is a rigorous demonstration of the correctness of his ontological approach
129
http://ifomis.org 129 Aristotle THE END
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.