1. Joint Waste Committee

2. General Overview Financial Goal (Driven by external factors – cost sharing) Financial Goal (Driven by external factors – cost sharing) Mindset – one Geographical Area serving 196,000 households Mindset – one Geographical Area serving 196,000 households Expect Change!! Do not expect status quo (2010 - 2 re-cyclates and doorstep experience) Expect Change!! Do not expect status quo (2010 - 2 re-cyclates and doorstep experience) Relate new service to key aims in business plan (outcome specification) Relate new service to key aims in business plan (outcome specification) Timescale (Gantt chart) – very tight! Timescale (Gantt chart) – very tight!

3. Summary Business Case Demonstrates there is a financial case to jointly procure – (note of caution as only modelling) Demonstrates there is a financial case to jointly procure – (note of caution as only modelling) Vision : This is about savings/cost avoidance!! Vision : This is about savings/cost avoidance!! Aims : drawn from previous reports - MoU Aims : drawn from previous reports - MoU - Financial savings - 50% Recycling - Waste minimisation - Customer satisfaction

4. 5 Areas of Investigation (i) Contractors -(Management/Productivity/Capacity) * Will be determined by tender process -Collection Methods * AWC * Charging * Co-mingled / Source separated * Range of materials * Particular areas (Old Town) (Procurement via CD output spec) (Procurement via CD output spec)

5. 5 Areas of Investigation (cont) (ii) Depots Determined via CD - Timeframe V Investment Determined via CD - Timeframe V Investment (length of contract important as depots are a long term investment) (length of contract important as depots are a long term investment) (iii) Client Management Functions (4 options) The more that goes in; the greater the savings The more that goes in; the greater the savings BUT a business decision on what’s in/out. BUT a business decision on what’s in/out.

6. 5 Areas of Investigation (cont) (iv) Management of Recycling Materials - Who manages the disposal of recyclate * In-house Districts/Boroughs /Admin. Authority * Contractor * Disposal Contract * or mix of the above - How recyclate is collected – co-mingled or source separated? source separated? Business case models savings but CD will clarify option This is about business risk – take full risk, avoid, share? (v) Procurement – see separate report on agenda

7. Process Invite to Tender via Competitive Dialogue Invite to Tender via Competitive Dialogue Specification Specification Output Spec. Detailed Input Spec. (Based on Aims) (Prescriptive Service – (Based on Aims) (Prescriptive Service – based on current service) based on current service) Route to be adopted

8. Tender Process Contractor to price on ‘As is service’ Contractor to price on ‘Output Specification’ based on the Aims What are the Absolutes e.g. AWC Contract Price Alternate Contract Price(s) CD There should be Absolutely NO Absolutes if want to maximise financial savings

9. Questions Expect Change !! Expect Change !!  Co-mingled V source-separated□ Risk of handling materials  Free garden waste V chargeable Contractors through CD will offer the best price Contractors through CD will offer the best price Absolutely NO Absolutes or as few as possible Absolutely NO Absolutes or as few as possible  to enable the market to respond to the aims Is this to be financially or service driven Is this to be financially or service driven When are the opt out points When are the opt out points CD - member involvement CD - member involvement Timeframe (no latitude for delays) Timeframe (no latitude for delays)

10. £ Cost of a single specification for all authority. (Cost sharing Agreement) (a) (b) (a) = Cost if one authority wants a specified service e.g. AWC. (b) = Impact of costs on rest of contract. a + b charged to that authority (However in some instances may still be financially viable).