1. 1 MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: LESSONS FOR POST-BUSAN PROGRESS Matthew Martin Director Development Finance International DfID Mutual Accountability Seminar 14 January 2013

2. 2 CONTEXT/BACKGROUND Worked with more than 35 governments on mutual accountability frameworks and assessing aid quality (part-funded by DfID, results used in MAR) Technical Advisor to developing country negotiators in Accra Agenda for Action, mutual accountability key focus of discussions Member of pre-Busan Task Team and post-Busan building block on mutual accountability (now added results) Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General on Development Cooperation as part of Development Cooperation Forum (DESA)  Major technical studies on progress/what works in MA  Based on survey covering 104 countries – of MA and results progress – results presented to DCF and BB on Results

3. 3 MA PROGRESS – KEY PILLARS (%)

4. 4 KEY AREAS FOR FUTURE PROGRESS 1.Most vital: targets and annual assessments for individual donors - has greatest influence on donor performance and increased results, + increased MA balance also encourages gvt progress 2.Enhancing domestic accountability with MA – folding MA into national structures/processes and increasing role of parliaments and civil society 3.Aid policies – incl. reducing aid dependence + MIC aid phaseout by enhancing domestic resource mobilisation – aid “working out of a job”

5. 5 CASE STUDY PROGRESS (Q1 2012) Afghanistan 19/104 – in top 20%:  lacking individual donor targets,  needs to involve non-executive sholders  could improve devt strategy and targets Sierra Leone 37/104 – in top 40%  no donor targets or assessment  could improve devt strategy and targets, and non-exec involvement

6. 6 BROAD RANGE OF DFID COUNTRIES Quite a few DfID priority countries score highly in top 20% – Mozambique, Rwanda, Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania Some surprising countries lagging on donor targets/assessment – Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Liberia, Uganda, Zambia many DfID countries virtually no progress – Nepal, DRC, South Africa, OPT, Kyrgyz, Jamaica, Nigeria, N&S Sudan, Guyana, Pakistan, Tajikistan (+ those in conflict – Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Myanmar, Zimbabwe) HIGH CORRELATION FRAGILITY ↔ LOW PROGRESS

7. 7 HOW TO GET THERE: PROMOTING KEY ENABLING FACTORS Government leadership essential: ensure clear lead institution/unity within government Like-minded donor group and key sponsors who will push others through peer pressure Trust – advance on key issues, sectors to demonstrate rapid progress is possible New Deal should be key step forward for fragile states – but  must be integrated into broader MA steps;  not be used as excuse for “second-best”, but as route to full-fledged MA Coordinate MA/transparency initiatives – eg aid databases include MA and link to results

8. 8 HOW TO GET THERE: OVERCOMING KEY BARRIERS Lack of capacity/understanding among government/donor/non-exec staff  Capacity-building programmes for partner governments and parliaments/CSOs as part of broader accountability drives  Ensure strong donor HQ leadership on MA and integration into work practices and incentives (DfID a leader) Lack of information on global best practice  Ensure continued monitoring and analysis of progress in context of Global Partnership (DCF survey and analysis to continue/expand) Political “events” disrupting/reversing progress  very careful definition of process for rowing back and keeping funds flowing to the poor

9. 9 KEY WAYS FORWARD Still a lot of work to do in DfID priority countries – especially to prioritise fragile states Have clear minimum standards (country-led aid policies, targets + annual assessments for individual donors, non-executive inclusion, ND compliance) and adapt to country needs/circumstances Work with other like-minded to ensure remains among top issues globally and nationally Continue to share information on progress and enabling factors/barriers (in DfID and beyond) – DESA establishing web repository on best practice Get the Building Block working more effectively – set targets for its results as TT did - to keep this at centre of Global Partnership