Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

12 year follow up: RCT for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction ProLong Study Group Cathryn Glazener, Christine MacArthur, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "12 year follow up: RCT for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction ProLong Study Group Cathryn Glazener, Christine MacArthur, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders,"— Presentation transcript:

1 12 year follow up: RCT for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction ProLong Study Group Cathryn Glazener, Christine MacArthur, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders, Robert Lancashire, Peter Herbison, Nicola Dean, Chris Bain, Phil Toozs-Hobson, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Karen Richardson, Don Wilson.

2 #BlueJC We will discuss this paper at #BlueJC on Twitter. Join us and share your thoughts! Follow @BJOGTweets How #BlueJC works? – Leung E, Tirlapur S, Siassakos D, Khan K. BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):657-60. http://bit.ly/10VaiRZhttp://bit.ly/10VaiRZ Further information? – See Journal Club section at http://www.bjog.org/http://www.bjog.org/

3 The Clinical Question There is a lack of evidence for effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for postnatal incontinence in the long term. Do women with postnatal urinary incontinence benefit from PFMT teaching?

4 Description of Research ParticipantsWomen with urinary incontinence 3 months after an index delivery in 1993-94 Intervention3 one-to-one instruction sessions on PFMT (+ bladder training if necessary) at 5, 7 and 9 months after delivery ComparisonStandard postnatal care Outcomes Primary outcome: urinary incontinence at 1, 6 and 12 years Secondary outcome: Performance of PFMT Faecal incontinence at 1, 6 and 12 years Prolapse symptom score (POP-SS) (12 years only) Prolapse at hymen or beyond (POP-Q) (12 years only)

5 Aims and Objectives To identify the advantages and disadvantages of the clinical outcomes used in this study To recap the purpose of stratification in a randomised-controlled trial To discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different questionnaire study designs To summarise the current evidence and reflect on its potential clinical applications

6 Recruitment to RCT Initial screening survey 10985 women Responded 7882 (72%) Incontinent at 3 months 2632 (33%) Continent at 3 months 5247 (67%) Randomised 747 (28%) Non participants 1885 (72%) RCT

7 Follow up – flow chart 747 randomised Intervention 371 Control 376 279 (75%) 263 (71%) 221 (60%) 245 (65%) 253 (67%) 228 (61%) FU at 1 year FU at 6 years FU at 12 years

8 Background Was the intervention (e.g. intensity and duration) in this clinical trial the same as in other similar studies? At your unit, how common is urinary incontinence at 3 months after childbirth?

9 Methods What is the purpose of stratification at randomisation in this clinical trial? Was it necessary to stratify for mode of delivery, and centre/hospital? Was the primary outcome in this study appropriate? Would you select different outcome measures?

10 Urinary incontinence 1 year P=0.037 6 years NS Percent 12 years NS 60% 69% 76% 79% 83% 80% 0 20 40 60 80 100 Intervention Control

11 Faecal incontinence Percent 1 year P=0.037 6 years NS 12 years NS 4% 11 % 12% 13% 19% 15% 0 20 40 Intervention Control

12 Compliance of PFMT Percent 1 year P=0.037 6 years NS 12 years NS 78 % 48% 50 % 52% 49% 0 20 40 60 80 100 Intervention Control

13 Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) At 12 years: *Prolapse symptom score: 3.14 vs 3.30 (NS) POP at hymen or beyond: 30% vs 29% (NS) * POP-SS: 0 = none of 7 symptoms, to 28 = maximum 7 symptoms all the time

14 Outcome (PFMT vs standard care; 448 responded at 12 year) Intervention 371 Comparison 376 183182 3846 Intervention Comparison Participants 747 2632 10985 Source population Intervention control Eligible population Participants GATE Frame (Primary outcome- urinary incontinence)

15 Results Was compliance satisfactory? How could this have affected the results? Can you suggest any strategy to improve the response rate of a similar study in the future?

16 Authors’ summary The modest effect of the conservative intervention was not sustained at 12 years – On urinary or faecal incontinence – On use of pelvic floor muscle training – No effect seen on prolapse at 12 years Women who have urinary incontinence after delivery have a long-term problem – The majority will still be incontinent – Also have other symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction

17 Take home message Can you briefly summarise the results of this study in a single sentence? Has this study changed your practice?

18 Suggested Reading Boyle R, Hay-Smith EJ, Cody JD, M›rkved S. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub2. Glazener C, Elders A, MacArthur C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Hagen S et al. Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurement of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 2013; 120(2):161-168.


Download ppt "12 year follow up: RCT for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction ProLong Study Group Cathryn Glazener, Christine MacArthur, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google