Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTracey Gilmore Modified over 8 years ago
1
Andrew S Triebwasser, MD January 20, 2010
2
Jill Maclaren Chorney, Ph.D., Carrie Torrey, B.A., Ronald Blount, Ph.D., Christine McLaren, Ph.D., Wen-Pin Chen, M.S., Zeev Kain, M.D., M.B.A. Anesthesiolog y 2009;111:1290-6
3
To date, no study has evaluated the impact of specific healthcare provider and parent behaviors on children’s distress and coping during anesthesia induction Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
5
18 month questionnaire data ENT pts Personality changes identified include bedwetting, apathy, sleep disturbances (nightmares), withdrawal, separation anxiety, fear of subsequent procedures, aggression ↑ younger age, unsatisfactory induction “experiences of hospitalization, anesthesia and operation not easily separated” AMA Am J Dis Child. 1953;86:587
6
Eckenhoff Am J Dis Child 1953 Meyers Anesth Analg 1977 Hannallah Can Anaesth 1983 Apathy Anxiety Enuresis Sleeping Eating 26% 23% 19% 32% 28% 45% 33% 34% 33% 37% 66% 5% 65%
7
Prospective study 163 children ages 2-10 Measured anxiety in HU and at separation Postoperative behavior changes correlated with anxiety of child and parent in HU ◦ 54% overall at 2 weeks ◦ 20% persisted for 6 months ◦ 7.3% persisted for 1 year Nightmares, separation anxiety, eating disorders, fear of doctors most common Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:1238
8
Tension, apprehension and worry Measurement tool validation – m-YPAS (Kain)* ◦ 27 items in 5 domains of behavior ◦ activity, emotional expressivity, arousal, vocalization and use of parents ↑ “vulnerability” – age < 5 (Kain 1999); high IQ, shy, ↓ adaptive abilities (Kain 2001); prior hospitalizations and poor interactions with health professionals in past; parental anxiety * Anesth Analg 1997;85:783
9
Anxiety during induction correlates with PACU excitement and postop changes (Kain 1999) Preoperative anxiety correlates with PACU agitation and postop changes (Kain 2004) Preoperative anxiety correlates with increase in pain scores and analgesic use (Kain 2006) Additional detrimental outcomes may be related to activation of the “stress” response
10
Behavioral modalities ◦ Coping strategies ◦ Preoperative program (POP) ◦ Parental presence Induction (PPIA) Pharmacologic modality (premed)
11
Classically described by Waters in 1938 Oral premed Nicolson 1989 Oral midazolam most common today Most commonly utilized age < 3 yrs
12
Effect on outcome unclear, even with more compliant induction ◦ Kain – reduced regressive behavior POD 1-7, but not POD 14 (1999) ◦ McGraw – increased changes at POD 7, all resolved by 4 wks (1998) Potential downsides: efficiency, costs (drug & personnel), paradoxical rxn
13
Behavioral modalities ◦ Coping strategies ◦ Preoperative program (POP) ◦ Parental presence Induction (PPIA) Pharmacologic modality (premed)
14
Coping strategies w/large body of literature and experience with painful procedures in chronic illness Preoperative programs PPIA
17
Numerous authors: improved anxiety scores and quality induction ◦ Varughese Anesth Analg 2008; 107:413 ◦ Vetter Anesth Analg 1993:77:96 Kain (ADVANCE)* ◦ Improved anxiety in HU / induction ◦ Decreased emergence agitation ◦ Decreased analgesic requirement in PACU *Anesthesiology 2007;106:65
18
PPIA increased from 1995-2002 BUT 10% used PPIA >75% of the time 50% NEVER used it 26% stated “against hospital policy” Anesth Analg 2004;98:1252
19
Separation anxiety “trauma” reflective of developmental age, genetics, parenting PPIA diminishes separation trauma for child and need for premedication Does increase overall parent satisfaction Effects on induction controversial and depend on the child and the parent ◦ shift focus on parent selection / preparation
20
Adult behaviors will impact child’s ability to cope with the stress of induction Emotion-based behaviors will tend to increase distress while distraction-based behaviors will tend to decrease distress Health care professionals and parents will take cues from each other Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
21
ASA I-II undergoing outpatient surgery Ages 2-10 ◦ Part of large-scale multicenter NIH-funded Behavioral Interactions-Perioperative Study (BIPS) Inhalation induction Exclusion – chronic illness, developmental delay, non-English speaking parents Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
22
Revised peri-operative child-adult medical procedure interaction scale (R-PCAMIS) ◦ Behavioral collection computer system utilized ◦ 44 defined verbal and non-verbal behavior codes State (duration) vs. Event (frequency) codes Six adult behavior codes ◦ 3 “distractions” and 3 “emotional support” Three child behavior codes ◦ Previously validated with m-YPAS (Anesth Analg 2009;109:1434) Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
23
ADULT BEHAVIOR CODESCHILD BEHAVIOR CODES Medical reinterpretation Non-procedural talk Humor Reassurance Empathy Empathic touch Acute distress ◦ Nonverbal resistance & cry Anticipatory Distress ◦ Verbal resistance ◦ Request for support ◦ Negative verbal emotion Regulating Behavior ◦ Non-procedure talk ◦ Engaging in medical play ◦ Seeking information Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
25
JMC trained 3 additional raters over 3 months ◦ familiarized with coding interface ◦ met at least 0.80 agreement training tapes Observer® XT software allows differentiation of individual behaviors from the interactions of many, while linking behavior to initiator Raters watched videos – coding ~ 4⁰ / subject 10% overlap to assure interrater reliability Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
26
Power – based on prior studies and allowing 5% for age variability, an n of 264 was chosen for appropriate statistical significance Spearman rank order utilized to compare relations among adult behaviors as well as the relationship of adult behavior to child distress Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
27
338 enrolled / final sample 293 48% female 85.7% non-Hispanic white 35% prior surgery 82% mother accompanied to the OR No differences noted in behavior across 14 anesthesiologists Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
28
ANESTHESIA NURSE PARENT reassurance 0.74 A 0.14 B 0.81 A empathy 0.04 A 0.01 B 0.02 A,B non-procedure talk 0.67 A 0.07 C 0.35 B humor 0.75 A 0.23 B 0.67 A reinterpretation 2.74 A 0.39 C 0.98 B Empathic touch 0.11 B 0.04 C 0.52 A Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6 A > B > C P < 0.001
29
ANESTHESIA PARENT NURSE PARENT ANESTHESIA NURSE reassurance 0.358* 0.216* 0.13 empathy 0.126 0.072 0.026 non-procedure talk 0.432* 0.194* 0.056 humor 0.327* 0.199* 0.200* reinterpretation 0.133 0.079 -0.083 empathic touch -0.064 0.042 0.039 Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6 Spearman rank order correlation * P < 0.001
30
CHILD DISTRESS BEHAVIOR CHILD REGULATING BEHAVIOR emotion-focused behavior (all adults) 0.575* -0.269* distracting behavior (all adults) -0.210* 0.286* Reinterpretation: anesthesiologist -0.077 0.370* parent 0.202* 0.042 nurse -0.020 0.023 Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6 Spearman rank order correlations * P < 0.001
31
Interaction ↑ between nurse (N) – parent (P) and anesthesiologist (A) – parent ◦ Parents tend to take cues from health providers ◦ Adults all respond to the same cues from child A and P engaged in behaviors most frequently ◦ A more medical reinterpretation ◦ P more empathic touch Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
32
Non-procedural talk and humor positively correlated with reducing child stress Empathy tends to increase distress ◦ agreement with several prior studies Reinterpretation by A tends to decrease child distress; by P tends to increase distress Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
33
Effects of age could be better stratified Effects of behavior leading up to induction Potential moderators of effect ◦ Child temperament ◦ Premedication ◦ Prior experiences ◦ Preoperative teaching program Correlation with multiple endpoints (emergence, behavior ∆’s, satisfaction) Anesthesiology 2009;111:1290-6
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.