Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(1/18) The contribution of GOCE densities to the semi-empirical thermosphere model DTM (Drag Temperature.

Published byWarren Howard Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(1/18) The contribution of GOCE densities to the semi-empirical thermosphere model DTM (Drag Temperature."— Presentation transcript:

1 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(1/18) The contribution of GOCE densities to the semi-empirical thermosphere model DTM (Drag Temperature Model - since 1978 ) Sean Bruinsma CNES - Department of Terrestrial and Planetary Geodesy Sean Bruinsma CNES - Department of Terrestrial and Planetary Geodesy ESA contract No. 4000102847/11/NL/EL

2 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(2/18) ATMOP (FP7 project): objective < 10°bias 2 types of errors Bias and resolution

3 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(3/18) DTM model The following variations are modeled (temperature and composition): periodicnon-periodic diurnallatitude (zonal) semi-diurnalsolar activity : F30 ter-diurnalgeomagnetic activity : kp annualsemi-annual (coupled with solar activity) Pros/Cons of empirical models: Fast computation, easy to use, relatively accurate (10-20%, 1  ) Low resolution, static response, proxy use, scale/bias problems,….

4 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(4/18) Solar proxies: F30 and F10.7

5 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(5/18) DTM model Data used in the construction of DTM2013: CHAMP 05/2001 - 08/2010 CHAMP 05/2001 - 08/2010 GRACE 01/2003 - 12/2011 GRACE 01/2003 - 12/2011 GOCE11/2009 - 05/2012 GOCE11/2009 - 05/2012 Starlette & Stella 01/1994 - 12/2012 Starlette & Stella 01/1994 - 12/2012 Deimos-1 03/2010 - 09/2011 Deimos-1 03/2010 - 09/2011 CACTUS 07/1975 - 01/1979 CACTUS 07/1975 - 01/1979 OGO606/1969 - 08/1975 OGO606/1969 - 08/1975 DE-2 (T, He, O, N 2 ) 08/1981 - 02/1983 DE-2 (T, He, O, N 2 ) 08/1981 - 02/1983 AE-C (N 2 ) 01/1974 - 04/1977 AE-C (N 2 ) 01/1974 - 04/1977 AE-E (T, He, O) 12/1975 - 05/1981 AE-E (T, He, O) 12/1975 - 05/1981 Data used in the construction of DTM2013: CHAMP 05/2001 - 08/2010 CHAMP 05/2001 - 08/2010 GRACE 01/2003 - 12/2011 GRACE 01/2003 - 12/2011 GOCE11/2009 - 05/2012 GOCE11/2009 - 05/2012 Starlette & Stella 01/1994 - 12/2012 Starlette & Stella 01/1994 - 12/2012 Deimos-1 03/2010 - 09/2011 Deimos-1 03/2010 - 09/2011 CACTUS 07/1975 - 01/1979 CACTUS 07/1975 - 01/1979 OGO606/1969 - 08/1975 OGO606/1969 - 08/1975 DE-2 (T, He, O, N 2 ) 08/1981 - 02/1983 DE-2 (T, He, O, N 2 ) 08/1981 - 02/1983 AE-C (N 2 ) 01/1974 - 04/1977 AE-C (N 2 ) 01/1974 - 04/1977 AE-E (T, He, O) 12/1975 - 05/1981 AE-E (T, He, O) 12/1975 - 05/1981

6 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(6/18) DTM model NB: No data above 1000 km; data is sparse below 300 km

7 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(7/18) Data: CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE CHAMP (2000-2010): STAR resolution: 3·10 -9 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 STAR resolution: 3·10 -9 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 87° inclination: 87° Altitude: 460-300 km Altitude: 460-300 km CHAMP (2000-2010): STAR resolution: 3·10 -9 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 STAR resolution: 3·10 -9 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 87° inclination: 87° Altitude: 460-300 km Altitude: 460-300 km GRACE (2003-): SuperSTAR resolution: 1·10 -10 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 SuperSTAR resolution: 1·10 -10 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 90° inclination: 90° Altitude: 490-450 km Altitude: 490-450 km GRACE (2003-): SuperSTAR resolution: 1·10 -10 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 SuperSTAR resolution: 1·10 -10 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 90° inclination: 90° Altitude: 490-450 km Altitude: 490-450 km GOCE (2009 – 2013): Acc. resolution: 1·10 -12 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 Acc. resolution: 1·10 -12 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 ion propulsion ion propulsion GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 96.5° inclination: 96.5° Altitude: 255-225 km Altitude: 255-225 km GOCE (2009 – 2013): Acc. resolution: 1·10 -12 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 Acc. resolution: 1·10 -12 m/s 2 /Hz 0.5 ion propulsion ion propulsion GPS and SLR GPS and SLR inclination: 96.5° inclination: 96.5° Altitude: 255-225 km Altitude: 255-225 km

8 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(8/18) Model comparisons (250 km, F=74, day=1)

9 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(9/18) Model comparisons (250 km, F=124, day=20)

10 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(10/18) Model comparisons (250 km, F=124, day=200)

11 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(11/18) Model comparisons (F=124, day=200) GOCE track

12 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(12/18) Model comparisons (F=124, day=200) Dawn profiles for 18 july 2012: GOCE and DTM2013 Dawn profiles for 18 july 2012: GOCE and DTM2013 Mean structure is correct, but the low resolution of the model is evident. DTM2013 density is 2% higher than GOCE in this example. Mean structure is correct, but the low resolution of the model is evident. DTM2013 density is 2% higher than GOCE in this example.

13 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(13/18) NB: data from June 2012 – October 2013 is not assimilated Model evaluation: GOCE per year (2010)Mean O/CRMS O/Ccorrelation NRLMSISE-000.9940.1320.929 JB20081.0830.1730.919 DTM20091.0760.1500.938 DTM20130.9880.0950.952 (2011)Mean O/CRMS O/Ccorrelation NRLMSISE-001.0720.1490.951 JB20081.1480.1890.963 DTM20091.1060.1570.963 DTM20131.0020.1110.938 (2012)Mean O/CRMS O/Ccorrelation NRLMSISE-001.0440.1390.922 JB20081.1920.2260.949 DTM20091.0830.1470.934 DTM20131.0110.1040.960 (2013)Mean O/CRMS O/Ccorrelation NRLMSISE-001.1150.1730.940 JB20081.1400.1760.955 DTM20091.1620.1990.950 DTM20131.0010.0960.949 Observed/Computed ratio (density ratios) andcorrelation Observed/Computed ratio (density ratios) andcorrelation

14 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(14/18) Model evaluation: binning GOCE data

15 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(15/18) DTM2009: all data per year O/C = Observed-to-Modeled ratio (ideally: O/C = 1.00) (pre-ATMOP benchmark model) GOCE

16 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(16/18) (CIRA model for drag) O/C = Observed-to-Modeled ratio (ideally: O/C = 1.00) GOCE JB2008: all data per year

17 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(17/18) (ATMOP model) O/C = Observed-to-Modeled ratio (ideally: O/C = 1.00) GOCE DTM2013: all data per year

18 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(18/18) Summary DTM2013 constructed with CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and historical data DTM2013 constructed with CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and historical data F30 solar proxy is used; better results than with F10.7 F30 solar proxy is used; better results than with F10.7 Most precise and least-biased model for GOCE, CHAMP, GRACE, Stella and Starlette Most precise and least-biased model for GOCE, CHAMP, GRACE, Stella and Starlette Standard deviation and RMS of DTM2013 is at the 10% level for GOCE densities (0.1 Hz / 80 km along track) Standard deviation and RMS of DTM2013 is at the 10% level for GOCE densities (0.1 Hz / 80 km along track) Note that GOCE data has: o Very limited local time coverage o Limited solar activity coverage The DTM model: www.atmop.eu & sean.bruinsma@cnes.fr

19 5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(19/18) DTM model Concentration at 120 km altitude spherical harmonic function function Concentration at 120 km altitude spherical harmonic function function Modeling of temperature and constituents (most important for orbit computation: O and He) using the following algorithm: Model coefficients a i (estimated)

Download ppt "5 th GOCE user workshop Aeronomy / Novel applications(1/18) The contribution of GOCE densities to the semi-empirical thermosphere model DTM (Drag Temperature."

Similar presentations

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June 2011 1.ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+

SWWT plenary meeting / 28 June 2011 Brussels Atmospheric Effects Topical Group Reporting period: 2010 – June ATMOP 2.MURI/NADIR (USA) 3.ESA GOCE+
NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 16 Density and Winds Inferred from GOCE Accelerometer (thrusters) Data Sean Bruinsma CNES, Toulouse Eelco.

NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 16 Density and Winds Inferred from GOCE Accelerometer (thrusters) Data Sean Bruinsma CNES, Toulouse Eelco.
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.

ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.
ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.

ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.

GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea

Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.

POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.
1 SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS ON SATELLITE DRAG 6 January 2006 Cheryl Huang, Frank A. Marcos and William Burke Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research.

1 SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS ON SATELLITE DRAG 6 January 2006 Cheryl Huang, Frank A. Marcos and William Burke Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research.
Altitude Response of Thermosphere Mass Density to Geomagnetic Activity in the Recent Solar Minimum Jeffrey P. Thayer, Xianjing Lui, and Jiuhou Lei MURI.

Altitude Response of Thermosphere Mass Density to Geomagnetic Activity in the Recent Solar Minimum Jeffrey P. Thayer, Xianjing Lui, and Jiuhou Lei MURI.
NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 15 Drag coefficients Sean Bruinsma CNES Marcin Pilinski CU Boulder.

NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 15 Drag coefficients Sean Bruinsma CNES Marcin Pilinski CU Boulder.
TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, 13 - 17 October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.

TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January 12 2006.

CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 20031 Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.
Theoretical Simulations of the Martian Ionosphere and Comparisons to Observations (How do thermospheric tides and variations in solar flux affect ionospheric.

Theoretical Simulations of the Martian Ionosphere and Comparisons to Observations (How do thermospheric tides and variations in solar flux affect ionospheric.
Wave Coupling Between the Lower Atmosphere and Thermosphere: Solar Cycle Influences 1 Jeffrey M. Forbes 1, Sean L. Bruinsma 2, Maura E. Hagan 3, and Xiaoli.

Wave Coupling Between the Lower Atmosphere and Thermosphere: Solar Cycle Influences 1 Jeffrey M. Forbes 1, Sean L. Bruinsma 2, Maura E. Hagan 3, and Xiaoli.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.

13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
The Impact of Composition on the Thermosphere Mass Density during Geomagnetic Activity Jeffrey P. Thayer, Xianjing Lui, Jiuhou Lei, Marcin Pilinski and.

The Impact of Composition on the Thermosphere Mass Density during Geomagnetic Activity Jeffrey P. Thayer, Xianjing Lui, Jiuhou Lei, Marcin Pilinski and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google