Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrent Barnett Modified over 8 years ago
1
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 (a) Axial variation of the liquid–vapor interface and the vapor and (b) liquid pressures along the heat pipe at moderate vapor flow rates Figure Legend:
2
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Thermal resistance model of a typical heat pipe Figure Legend:
3
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Loop heat pipe Figure Legend:
4
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Pulsating heat pipe (a) unlooped and (b) looped Figure Legend:
5
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Schematic of an inverted meniscus type evaporator with the triangular fin: (a) with low heat fluxes and (b) with high heat fluxes Figure Legend:
6
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Conceptual design of a leading edge heat pipe Figure Legend:
7
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 The axial interface temperature profile along the sodium heat pipe with Q = 560 W, R v = 0.007 m, L e = 0.1 m, L a = 0.05 m, k l = 66.2 W/m 2 K, k s = 19.0 W/m 2 K, δ l = 0.0005 m, δ w = 0.001 m [38] Figure Legend:
8
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Heat pipe wall and vapor temperature versus axial location for (a) single evaporator and (b) two evaporators [40] Figure Legend:
9
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Centerline vapor temperature for transient response to heat input pulse: (a) convective boundary condition and (b) radiative boundary condition [50] Figure Legend:
10
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Leading edge heat pipe outer wall temperature distribution [53] Figure Legend:
11
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Wall temperature prediction for frozen start up by Cao and Faghri [60] compared with the experimental data of (a) Faghri et al. [52] and (b) Ponnappan [61] Figure Legend:
12
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Analytical wall temperature prediction for frozen startup by Cao and Faghri [62] compared with experimental data of (a) Faghri et al. [52] and (b) Ponnappan [61] Figure Legend:
13
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Comparison of the model predictions with experimental data ((symbols) experimental data from Hopkins et al. [22] and (lines) numerical simulation results from the Do et al. [68] model): (a) maximum heat transport rate and (b) wall temperature. (Adopted from Do et al. [68].) Figure Legend:
14
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Comparison of LHP modeling predictions [100] with experimental results of (a) Chuang [96] for ammonia as the working fluid and (b) Boo and Chung [108] for acetone as the working fluid Figure Legend:
15
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Review and Advances in Heat Pipe Science and Technology J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(12):123001-123001-18. doi:10.1115/1.4007407 Heat transfer rate: (a) sensible heat and (b) evaporative heat [142] Figure Legend:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.