1. Contact email: Stephen.Day@uws.ac.uk Sandra.Mckechan@uws.ac.ukStephen.Day@uws.ac.uk Sandra.Mckechan@uws.ac.uk Do advanced qualifications equate to better mathematical knowledge for primary teaching? Sandra McKechan and Stephen Day University of the West of Scotland, School of Education

2. Aims 1.To compare Scottish Primary Initial Teacher Education students’ existing mathematics qualifications to their subject content knowledge of fractions, decimal fractions and percentages required for primary teaching 2.To investigate whether the entry requirement for primary teaching should be raised to require SCQF level 6 Higher Mathematics.

3. Context: 1 ‘Current requirements relating to Scottish Qualifications Authority qualifications in English and mathematics do not seem to provide a sufficient guarantee of the levels of competence which are required for teaching’ (Donaldson, 2010, 27).

4. Context: 2 ‘ A National Qualification Course award in Mathematics at SCQF Level 5 (National 5 Mathematics or an accepted alternative), is an essential minimum requirement for entry to all teacher education Programmes’ (GTCS, 2013). ‘Consideration will also be given in the future to raising the required level of Maths qualification to SCQF level 6 at a later date’ (GTCS, 2013, 3).

5. Sample Two cohorts of undergraduate primary teaching students (n=149) at the beginning of a mathematics module in the first year of a four-year programme.

6. Methodology This case study utilised the percentage test scores achieved in a subject content knowledge assessment of mathematics And Investigated potential relationships between personal mathematical subject content knowledge and level of existing SCQF mathematics qualifications.

7. Instrument We measured subject content knowledge for teaching fractions, decimal fractions and percentages, including aspects of relational understanding and computational facility. Identify the decimal fractions shown in each diagram. Draw a number line and mark the position of each of the decimals in parts a) and b). a) b)

8. Analysis: 1 All mathematics content knowledge assessments were marked, moderated and check for marker consistency and accuracy. The scores for each question in the test was then manually entered into a score matrix on Microsoft Excel © to facilitate further detailed analysis of how the students’ performed in each question (data not presented here). This process was double entered by a research assistant into the Excel spreadsheet to ensure accuracy.

9. Analysis: 2 The data was imported into SPSS © version 20, where downstream statistical analysis was performed. The distribution of the data was checked for normality using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, which confirmed that the data was normally distributed. Descriptive statistical analysis was then performed to generate the mean, standard deviation, standard error of mean, median and interquartile range for each entry level qualification category The data was then stratified and categorized according to students’ highest entry level Mathematics qualification.

10. Analysis: 3 Inferential statistical analysis was performed where the data was analysed using a Friedman two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was then conducted using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a Bonferroni correction applied to establish whether there was a statistically significant difference between the students’ percentage test scores and their entry level Mathematics qualification. Statistics are presented as medians (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated.

11. Findings: 1 The statistical analysis of students’ entry-level mathematics qualification in relation to each student’s percentage test score is presented, in order to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in student performance based on entry- level Mathematics qualification within our sample. Combined assessment results were found to be normally distributed.

12. Findings: 2 Mean % scores ± standard deviation for the subject content knowledge assessment: Overall - 62.2% ± 15.7 Relation to qualification on entry to ITE o Higher - 68.2% ± 13.7% o Intermediate two - 52.1% ± 14.2% o Standard Grade Credit- 61.7% ± 14.9%

13. Findings: 3 Plot of students’ test scores against their entry level Mathematics qualification UCAS Score Level 80AH C 72Higher A 60Higher B 48Higher C 42Int 2 A 38SG Credit 1 35Int 2 B 28Int 2 C/ SG Credit 2 Key

14. Findings: 4 Students’ test score compared to the students entry level Mathematics qualification.

15. Conclusion The data confirms that: 1.Students who held a SCQF level 6 Higher Grade qualification did not perform significantly better in a subject content knowledge assessment of Mathematics test when compared to students who held a SCQF level 5 Standard Grade Credit pass only 2.Students who held a SCQF level 5 intermediate two mathematics qualification performed significantly worse than those who held a Higher Grade in the subject content knowledge assessment of mathematics test 3.Students who held an Intermediate two pass did not perform better than Students holding Standard Grade Credit pass on entry to ITE.

16. A note of caution please! 1.The Mathematical content knowledge assessment was taken on entry to ITE. Therefore does not say anything about how students perform at the end of ITE 2.The data presented does not imply that a relationship inevitably exists between such content knowledge and the kinds of teaching performance that lead to improved pupil achievement 3.The sample was a convenience sample and relatively small.

17. Implications: 1 This data affirms the concern raised by Donaldson (2010) that ‘Current requirements relating to Scottish Qualifications Authority qualifications in … mathematics do not seem to provide a sufficient guarantee of the levels of competence which are required for teaching.’ Refutes the suggestion that targets should be set for selecting a larger proportion of student teachers with mathematics qualification to at least SCQF level 6 (SEEAG, 2012).

18. Implications: 2 Further research required into routes of study by the sample required to expand and explain findings. Further research will be required over the next few years to establish whether the curricular changes to new National Mathematics qualifications have had a positive impact on primary education students’ level of Mathematical content knowledge.

19. ‘Previous curriculum reform in mathematics in the shape of 5-14, which had already advocated many of these reforms [as proffered by CfE] did not lead to change and, without addressing primary teachers’ own subject knowledge, it has to be questioned whether CfE will either’ (Henderson, 2012a emphasis added, 54). Postscript

20. References Donaldson, G. (2010) Teaching Scotland's Future - Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government. General Teaching Council for Scotland. (2013a) Memorandum on Entry Requirements to Programmes of Initial Teacher Education in Scotland. [online]. Available: http://www.gtcs.org.uk/education-in- scotland/universities.aspx [accessed June 20, 2014].http://www.gtcs.org.uk/education-in- scotland/universities.aspx Henderson, S. (2012a) Why the journey to mathematical excellence may be long in Scotland’s primary schools. Scottish Educational Review, 44(1), 46-56. Science and Engineering Education Advisory Group, (2012). Supporting Scotland’s STEM education and culture: Second Report. Available online http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0038/00388616.pdf [last accessed 10/05/2013].