1. Independent Power Plants; Seeking Permitting/Regulatory Survival Solutions in the 21 st Century OR How I Became The Way I Am By Dr. Ted Guth

2. Pb

3. CH 2 O

7. BACT In The Saddle Reluctance of Air Districts to Recognize Differences in Solid Fuels Moving Target

8. Known Technologies Source TypeAchievable TechnologyAchievable Level Utility BoilersSelective catalytic reduction0.01 lb/mmBtu Boilers > 40 mmBtu (refineries) Ultra Low NO x burners 9 ppm Boilers >= 20 mmBtu (except refinery heaters > 40 mmBtu) Ultra Low NO x burners 9 ppm Boilers < 20 mmBtu Ultra Low NO x burners 12ppm Process heaters > 40mmBtu (refineries) Low NO x burners 0.03 lb/mmBtu Process heaters > 2 mmBtu (except refinery heaters > 40 mmBtu) Low NO x burners0.03 lb/mmBtu Gas turbinesSelective catalytic reduction9 ppm Diesel ICEsSelective catalytic reduction44 ppm Natural gas ICEs3-way Catalyst24-27 ppm Note: Cost effectiveness data is not presented in this table because it may vary depending on the specific unit being controlled and the amount of emissions reduced.

9. Further Control Opportunities Source TypeControl TechnologyControl Emission Level Utility BoilerSCR5 ppmv at 3% O 2 Boilers > 20 mmBtuSCR7 ppmv at 3% O 2 Boilers < 20 mmBtuULNB9 ppmv at 3% O 2 BoilersSCONOX 2 2+ ppmv at 3% O 2 BoilersLTO 2 5-7 ppmv at 3% O 2 Process Heaters > 40 mmBtu (refineries)SCR5 ppmv at 3% O 2 Process Heaters > 40 mmBtu (refineries)LNB18 ppmv at 3% O 2 Gas TurbinesSCONOX1 ppmv at 15% O 2 Gas TurbinesXONON2.5 ppmv at 15% O 2 Gas TurbinesSCR3 ppmv at 15% O 2 ICE, DieselNO x TEC33 ppmv at 15% O 2 ICE, Natural GasNSCR11 ppmv at 15% O 2 DryerULNB10 ppmv at 3% O 2 DryerLNB30 ppmv at 3% O 2 OvenLNB30 ppmv at 3% O 2 FurnaceLNB40 ppmv at 3% O 2 Furnace, metal meltingOxy-fuel9 ppmv at 3% O 2 AfterburnerLNB30 ppmv at 3% O 2 1 Cost-effectiveness data is not presented in this table because it may vary depending on the specific unit being controlled and the amount of emissions reduced. 2 SCONOX and LTO technologies are in use for boilers but not for a full six-month period.

10. Our Friend the Variance

11. Ambient Considerations (If You Build It They Will Complain) Citing Reputation Homework

12. Location, Location, Location

13. The Things Project Developers Will Do For Their Friend the Blunt Nosed Lizard

15. The Weather is Here Wish You Were Beautiful

16. The Good, the Bad and the Expensive

18. First Time Shame on You, Second Time Shame on Me OR Can You Say Risk Money? Sure You Can Financial community will be skittish to invest in new plants if existing plants are abandoned.

19. Fuel for Thought

20. Deregulation: Stupid Is as Stupid Does Existing plants are now focused on cutting fuel costs in coming years as they are forced to compete with natural gas generation on price alone. They’ll be adapting to poorer grades of existing fuels, or using new alternative fuels (e.g., railroad ties, waste paper, petroleum coke, green yard wastes, refuse derived fuel, etc.)

21. The Renewable Portfolio Standard requires an annual increase in renewable generation equivalent to at least 1% of (MW-hour) sales; aggregate goal: 20% by 2017. Southern California Edison says they’re already there. Fire Prevention

22. A Waste Is A Terrible Thing to Mind The majority of CA biomass fuels are the result of a diversion of a waste stream to a power plant; i.e., “Somebody somewhere is paying something to get rid of it.” Waste producer’s cost of disposal vs. Price plant willing to pay.

23. Conclusions Go Ahead, Make My Day CA’s existing biomass power plants have been an effective solution to the disposal of various in- state waste streams, and new plants could add to that success story. Existing plants are preparing today for the end of their current fixed energy prices. Steps they take now may not be reversible. New plants, like the existing plants, will require the impetus of State policy to remain successful.

24. Greenhouse Gas Regulations/Compliance Alias The Consultant Relief Act

25. EPA We’ve Upped Our Standards Now Up Yours