2. Thinking part I Mental Representations and Visual Imagery Mind Reading

3. Overview Nature of mental representations –analogical vs. symbolic representations Relationship between imagery and perception Distortions in mental maps Mind reading –predicting what somebody is thinking of based on brain activity

4. Study of Imagery Banned by behaviorists Possible subject of study in cognitive psychology –Cognitive psychology is distinguished from the earlier behaviorism by its claim that there are internal representations of knowledge on which the mind operates However, this is a difficult area of study Mental images are subjective How can we show that images are used? How are they represented? Stephen Kosslyn (did much of the research on mental imagery)

5. Nature of Mental Representations The analog vs. propositional debate –analog representations: the representation has the same structure as the thing represented –symbolic / propositional representations: a sentence- like description of the image, non-spatial

6. Analog Images vs. Propositions Analog Imagine: The can is on the box. The can is black Propositions (Symbolic representation) on( can, box ) black( can )

7. Imagery and Analog Representations Most studies on imagery argue for analog representations (e.g., mental rotation, brain imaging studies). Yet mental images are not processed exactly the same as visual images

8. Imagery = perception in reverse?

9. Imagery & Perception If the mechanisms used to perceive stimuli are also used to generate mental images, then we should predict: –Mental images should be quasy pictorial –Mental images should activate some of the brain areas involved with visual processing

10. Just as in visual images, level of detail in mental images can vary Does a rabbit have eyebrows? Imagine a bee next to a rabbitImagine a elephant standing next to a rabbit Does a rabbit have eyebrows?

11. Visual Imagery and Hemispatial Neglect (Bisiach and Luzzatti, 1978) Mental images from opposite sides of an imagined public landmark

12. Evidence from brain imaging (fMRI) for involvement of visual processing areas during visual imagery (Le Bihan et al., 1993)

13. Differences between pictures and mental images Mental images are more difficult to be reinterpreted –Mental image = percept + interpretation

14. Imagery and Ambiguous Figures What would this object look like when rotated 90 degrees?

16. Imagery and Ambiguous Figures If you see one interpretation, it is very difficult to then imagine the other interpretation (unless you are trained in this task) One difference between imagery and visual perception: visual images, unlike mental images, can be easily reinterpreted

17. Mental Images might miss important aspects of object being imagined Imagine you have a cube between your thumb and index finger. One corner of the cube touches your thumb, and the diagonally opposite corner touches your index finger. Now, point to the locations of the rest of the corners in space. Many people point (incorrectly) to four points on the same plane half way between the top and bottom corners. Correct Solution:

18. Imagine this object Does this figure contain a parallelogram? a)no b)yes c)not sure d)what is a parallelogram?? parallelogram

19. Mental Rotation Can mental images be transformed in a way analagous to physical objects? How could we tell? Mental rotation task: look at the time it takes to rotate two shapes into correspondence Demo experiment: http://bjornson.inhb.de/?p=55 http://bjornson.inhb.de/?p=55

20. Example Trials same different same different samedifferent

21. Results linear relationship between angle of rotation and reaction time in object comparison The mental process seems to be analogous to the physical process of rotation.

22. Mental distortions in Cognitive Maps

23. Which is further west? a)atlantic entrance to the panama canal b)pacific entrance to the panama canal

24. Which is further east? a)Florida b)Chile

25. Which is further south: a)Philadelphia b)Rome

26. Which is further east? a) Reno b) San Diego

27. Cognitive maps are affected by conceptual knowledge Relative locations of small regions is determined by a conceptualization of larger regions. Line of reasoning: Nevada is east of California Reno is in Nevada, San Diego in California, Therefore, Reno must be east of San Diego

28. Experimental evidence for hierarchical organization in cognitive maps Ss. study maps. Later, from memory, they judge relative position of locations x and y Performance was better when superordinate information was congruent with question Congruent Incongruent (Stevens and Coupe, 1978)

29. Summary Imagined information is processed in similar ways to perceptual information –Neuroscience evidence (fMRI) –Neuropsychological evidence –Behavioral evidence: Kosslyn studies/ Scanning studies Mental rotation But there are also differences: –Mental images are difficult to reinterpret –Cognitive distortions in mental maps

30. “Mind reading”

31. Mind Reading (or Thought Identification) Viewing a BottleViewing a Shoe If the brain response is different for different kinds of stimuli, can we predict what somebody is thinking of solely based on the brain’s response? brain response

32. Faces Cats Scissors Chairs Houses Bottles Shoes Scrambled Pictures slides courtesy of Jim Haxby Haxby et al. (2001) can predict with 96% accuracy stimuli from 8 categories

33. Reconstructing the Mental Image If we can predict what somebody is looking at, can we also reconstruct what somebody might be looking at from just the brain’s response? Image Brain’s response Mathematical Model Reconstructed image Is this science fiction?

34. Reconstruction from brain activity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsjDnYxJ0bo&feature=related Nishimoto et al. (2011), "Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies", Current Biology.Current Biology

35. Reconstruction from Brain Activity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMA23JJ1M1o Volunteers watched clips of several movies while in a fMRI scanner. An algorithm later found movie clips that best “explained” the brain activity Nishimoto et al. (2011)

36. Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16811042 Reconstructed

37. OTHER

38. Video: Mind Reading (~5 min.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jc8URRxPIg

39. Reconstructing simple patterns from fMRI Miyawaki et al. (2008) from: Miyawaki et al. (2008). Neuron, 60(5), pp. 915-929. movie at: http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teachingP140C/demos/mmc2.mpghttp://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teachingP140C/demos/mmc2.mpg